CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较介入化疗栓塞术联合体外高频热疗与单纯介入化疗栓塞术治疗晚期肝癌的疗效和毒副反应.方法 39例晚期原发性肝癌患者随机分为两组,观察组19例,对照组20例.观察组行介入化疗栓塞术联合体外高频热疗,对照组行单纯介入化疗栓塞术治疗.结果观察组总有效率73.7%(14/19);对照组总有效率40%(8/20),观察组的治疗有效率较对照组明显提高(P＜0.05),毒副反应未增加.0.5年、1年生存率两组差异无显著性(P＞0.05).结论介入化疗栓塞术联合体外高频热疗提高了晚期肝癌的近期疗效,且不增加毒副作用.
목적 비교개입화료전새술연합체외고빈열료여단순개입화료전새술치료만기간암적료효화독부반응.방법 39례만기원발성간암환자수궤분위량조,관찰조19례,대조조20례.관찰조행개입화료전새술연합체외고빈열료,대조조행단순개입화료전새술치료.결과 관찰조총유효솔73.7%(14/19);대조조총유효솔40%(8/20),관찰조적치료유효솔교대조조명현제고(P＜0.05),독부반응미증가.0.5년、1년생존솔량조차이무현저성(P＞0.05).결론 개입화료전새술연합체외고빈열료제고료만기간암적근기료효,차불증가독부작용.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of transeatheter arteria chemoembolization combined with external high frequency thermotherapy for advanced hepatic cancer.Methods Thirty nine patients were randomly divided into 2 groups ,one group with 19 cases,the other 20 cases.The observed group was treated by transcatheter arteria.chemoembolization combined with external high frequency thermotherapy,and the control group by ordinary transcatheter arteria chemoembolization.Result The response rate with the observed group and control group were 73.7%(14/19) and 40%(8/20)respeetively(P＜0.05),and its side effects was not increased.There was no significant difference in the survival rate.Conclusions The short term efficacy of the advanced hepatic cancer is improved by transcatheter arteria chemoembolization combined with external high frequency thermotherapy and its side effects is not increased.