生态环境学报
生態環境學報
생태배경학보
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
2010年
3期
505-508
,共4页
童银栋%张巍%胡丹%王学军
童銀棟%張巍%鬍丹%王學軍
동은동%장외%호단%왕학군
降雪%气态总汞%气象因素%日变化
降雪%氣態總汞%氣象因素%日變化
강설%기태총홍%기상인소%일변화
snowfall%total gaseous mercury (TGM)%meteorological factors%daily variation
2009年降雪和非降雪期间对北京西北城区的气态总汞浓度进行了连续采样,比较了降雪期间、非降雪期间的气态总汞浓度日变化过程;降雪期间气态总汞浓度的降低和恢复过程.结果表明,降雪和非降雪期间大气气态总汞浓度的日均值有显著差异,降雪期间气态总汞的平均浓度为5.64ng·m~(-3),非降雪期间的平均浓度为7.43 ng·m~(-3),前者约为后者的70%.降雪后约7h气态总汞浓度恢复到降雪前水平.研究中分析了气象因素(气压、风速、阵风速度、气温和相对湿度)对于气态总汞浓度的影响,结果表明:降雪期间主要受到风速(r=-0.527)和阵风速度(r=-0.574)的影响;非降雪期间主要受到风速(r=-0.691),阵风速度(r=-0.726)和相对湿度(r=0.692)的影响,并且相对湿度的影响与风速的影响相近.降雪和非降雪期间气态总汞的日变化有所差异:非降雪期间气态总汞浓度在午夜和清晨较高,日变化趋势与相对湿度一致;降雪期间气态总汞的日变化没有明显规律.
2009年降雪和非降雪期間對北京西北城區的氣態總汞濃度進行瞭連續採樣,比較瞭降雪期間、非降雪期間的氣態總汞濃度日變化過程;降雪期間氣態總汞濃度的降低和恢複過程.結果錶明,降雪和非降雪期間大氣氣態總汞濃度的日均值有顯著差異,降雪期間氣態總汞的平均濃度為5.64ng·m~(-3),非降雪期間的平均濃度為7.43 ng·m~(-3),前者約為後者的70%.降雪後約7h氣態總汞濃度恢複到降雪前水平.研究中分析瞭氣象因素(氣壓、風速、陣風速度、氣溫和相對濕度)對于氣態總汞濃度的影響,結果錶明:降雪期間主要受到風速(r=-0.527)和陣風速度(r=-0.574)的影響;非降雪期間主要受到風速(r=-0.691),陣風速度(r=-0.726)和相對濕度(r=0.692)的影響,併且相對濕度的影響與風速的影響相近.降雪和非降雪期間氣態總汞的日變化有所差異:非降雪期間氣態總汞濃度在午夜和清晨較高,日變化趨勢與相對濕度一緻;降雪期間氣態總汞的日變化沒有明顯規律.
2009년강설화비강설기간대북경서북성구적기태총홍농도진행료련속채양,비교료강설기간、비강설기간적기태총홍농도일변화과정;강설기간기태총홍농도적강저화회복과정.결과표명,강설화비강설기간대기기태총홍농도적일균치유현저차이,강설기간기태총홍적평균농도위5.64ng·m~(-3),비강설기간적평균농도위7.43 ng·m~(-3),전자약위후자적70%.강설후약7h기태총홍농도회복도강설전수평.연구중분석료기상인소(기압、풍속、진풍속도、기온화상대습도)대우기태총홍농도적영향,결과표명:강설기간주요수도풍속(r=-0.527)화진풍속도(r=-0.574)적영향;비강설기간주요수도풍속(r=-0.691),진풍속도(r=-0.726)화상대습도(r=0.692)적영향,병차상대습도적영향여풍속적영향상근.강설화비강설기간기태총홍적일변화유소차이:비강설기간기태총홍농도재오야화청신교고,일변화추세여상대습도일치;강설기간기태총홍적일변화몰유명현규률.
An intensive field monitoring campaign was conducted for measurement of total gaseous mercury (TGM) in Beijing urban area during the snow period, 2009. Results show the mean concentration of TGM within 96 hours after the first snowing event is about 70% of the concentrations during dry days. The impact of meteorological factors on TGM concentration, including air pressure, wind speed, gust speed, temperature and relatively humidity, were analyzed Results indicate that the meteorological influences on TGM were mainly caused by wind speed (r= -0.527), gust wind speed (r= -0.574) during the snow period; while during dry days, influences were caused by wind speed (r= -0.691), gust wind speed(r= -0.726) and relatively humidity(r= 0.692). During dry days, the TGM in the mid-night and early morning was much higher, and the daily variation showed a similar trend with the relative hu-midity; while during snow days, no clear variation pattern was observed.