生态环境学报
生態環境學報
생태배경학보
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
2010年
3期
646-651
,共6页
马志林%陈丽华%于显威%韩鹏%任慧君
馬誌林%陳麗華%于顯威%韓鵬%任慧君
마지림%진려화%우현위%한붕%임혜군
森林健康%林分%比较研究%北京西山
森林健康%林分%比較研究%北京西山
삼림건강%림분%비교연구%북경서산
forest health%forest stand%comparative research%Beijing west-mountainous area
以不同树种林分健康状况比较研究为切入点,以北京西山地区同一时期的油松×侧柏混交林、油松(Pinus tabulaeformis)林、侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)林和栓皮栎(Quercus variabis)林为研究对象.通过构建林分健康评价指标体系,计算林分综合健康指数,分别对不同林分的健康状况进行了分析和比较,探讨不同林分开展森林健康经营的关键环节,同时也从森林健康的角度说明造林树种选择的重要性.研究结果表明:各林分综合健康指数都为正值但数值都不高,这表明目前各林分都处于健康状态,但对外界扰动反应较为敏感,按健康状况排序:油松×侧柏林0.234>栓皮栎林0.186>油松林0.145>侧柏林0.128;从单个指标看,各林分中都有负值指标出现,由此揭示,对负值指标的调整和增加正向指标的指标值是森林健康经营的关键.
以不同樹種林分健康狀況比較研究為切入點,以北京西山地區同一時期的油鬆×側柏混交林、油鬆(Pinus tabulaeformis)林、側柏(Platycladus orientalis)林和栓皮櫟(Quercus variabis)林為研究對象.通過構建林分健康評價指標體繫,計算林分綜閤健康指數,分彆對不同林分的健康狀況進行瞭分析和比較,探討不同林分開展森林健康經營的關鍵環節,同時也從森林健康的角度說明造林樹種選擇的重要性.研究結果錶明:各林分綜閤健康指數都為正值但數值都不高,這錶明目前各林分都處于健康狀態,但對外界擾動反應較為敏感,按健康狀況排序:油鬆×側柏林0.234>栓皮櫟林0.186>油鬆林0.145>側柏林0.128;從單箇指標看,各林分中都有負值指標齣現,由此揭示,對負值指標的調整和增加正嚮指標的指標值是森林健康經營的關鍵.
이불동수충림분건강상황비교연구위절입점,이북경서산지구동일시기적유송×측백혼교림、유송(Pinus tabulaeformis)림、측백(Platycladus orientalis)림화전피력(Quercus variabis)림위연구대상.통과구건림분건강평개지표체계,계산림분종합건강지수,분별대불동림분적건강상황진행료분석화비교,탐토불동림분개전삼림건강경영적관건배절,동시야종삼림건강적각도설명조림수충선택적중요성.연구결과표명:각림분종합건강지수도위정치단수치도불고,저표명목전각림분도처우건강상태,단대외계우동반응교위민감,안건강상황배서:유송×측백림0.234>전피력림0.186>유송림0.145>측백림0.128;종단개지표간,각림분중도유부치지표출현,유차게시,대부치지표적조정화증가정향지표적지표치시삼림건강경영적관건.
Taking Pine × Side Berlin forests, pine forests, oriental arborvitae forests and cork oak forests planted in the same period in the Beijing west-mountainous area as the object, this paper studies forest health conditions of different tree species and different standing forests. Through the construction of the forest health system, and the comprehensive index calculation, the health status of different tree species were analyzed and compared separately. Then we discuss the importance of tree special selection, as well as the key link in forest health management of different tree species. The results showed that the forest health index values are positive but not high, which indicates that the forests are in a good state of health currently, but more sensitive responses to external disturbances are necessary for future improvements in forest health. The health status sorts were, Pine × Side, Berlin 0.234>, Cork oak for-ests0.186,> pine forests 0.145, >side Berlin forests 0.128. Comparatively, some indicators from different forests showed negative values. According to this, it is critical to adjust negative indicator values and increase positive indicator values in forest health man-agement.