四川警察学院学报
四川警察學院學報
사천경찰학원학보
JOURNAL OF SICHUAN POLICE COLLEGE
2011年
5期
109-112
,共4页
心理卫生%心理防御机制%男性服刑人员%重复测量方差分析
心理衛生%心理防禦機製%男性服刑人員%重複測量方差分析
심리위생%심리방어궤제%남성복형인원%중복측량방차분석
Psychophylaxis%Mental defense mechanisms%Male prisoners%ANOVA for repeated measurement
目的探查男性服刑人员心理防御机制的使用情况及其特点。方法采用随机抽样方法,使用防御方式问卷(DSQ)对355名男性服刑人员心理防御机制进行团体测查。结果男性服刑人员成熟防御机制得分最高,中间型次之,不成熟型最低(F=199.28,P〈0.001)。青年组成熟型防御机制得分低于中年组(t=-3.14,P〈0.01);随受教育程度升高,男性服刑人员的不成熟型防御机制得分逐渐降低,成熟型得分逐渐上升;暴力组成熟型防御机制得分低于非暴力组(t=-2.18,P〈0.05),不成熟型得分高于非暴力组(t=3.69,P〈0.001)。结论年龄、受教育程度及犯罪类型对男性服刑人员的心理防御机制有影响。男性服刑人员使用不成熟防御机制的频度偏高。
目的探查男性服刑人員心理防禦機製的使用情況及其特點。方法採用隨機抽樣方法,使用防禦方式問捲(DSQ)對355名男性服刑人員心理防禦機製進行糰體測查。結果男性服刑人員成熟防禦機製得分最高,中間型次之,不成熟型最低(F=199.28,P〈0.001)。青年組成熟型防禦機製得分低于中年組(t=-3.14,P〈0.01);隨受教育程度升高,男性服刑人員的不成熟型防禦機製得分逐漸降低,成熟型得分逐漸上升;暴力組成熟型防禦機製得分低于非暴力組(t=-2.18,P〈0.05),不成熟型得分高于非暴力組(t=3.69,P〈0.001)。結論年齡、受教育程度及犯罪類型對男性服刑人員的心理防禦機製有影響。男性服刑人員使用不成熟防禦機製的頻度偏高。
목적탐사남성복형인원심리방어궤제적사용정황급기특점。방법채용수궤추양방법,사용방어방식문권(DSQ)대355명남성복형인원심리방어궤제진행단체측사。결과남성복형인원성숙방어궤제득분최고,중간형차지,불성숙형최저(F=199.28,P〈0.001)。청년조성숙형방어궤제득분저우중년조(t=-3.14,P〈0.01);수수교육정도승고,남성복형인원적불성숙형방어궤제득분축점강저,성숙형득분축점상승;폭력조성숙형방어궤제득분저우비폭력조(t=-2.18,P〈0.05),불성숙형득분고우비폭력조(t=3.69,P〈0.001)。결론년령、수교육정도급범죄류형대남성복형인원적심리방어궤제유영향。남성복형인원사용불성숙방어궤제적빈도편고。
Objective To explore the using status and characteristics of male prisoners' mental defense mechanisms. Methods By employing random sampling survey, totally 355 male prisoners were assessed in group with Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ). Results The mature defenses score of male prisoners is higher than that of the intermediate and immature defenses, while the lowest is the immature defenses score (F=199.28, P 〈 0.001). The mature defenses score of the youth group is lower than that of the middle-aged group (t= - 3.14, P 〈 0.01); With the increase of educational levels, the immature defenses scores of male prisoners gradually decreased, while mature defenses scores gradually raised; the mature defenses score of violent group is lower than that of nonviolent group (t= - 2.18, P 〈 0.05), while the scores of immature defenses are higher (t=3.69, P 〈 0.001). Conclusion Age, educational level and criminal types have influence on male prisoners' defense mechanism. The frequency of immature defenses that the male prisoners used is too high.