CAJ | 학술논문

最高人民法院等五部委于2010年10月1日签发量刑程序司法解释文件,确立＂相对独立量刑程序＂,规范检察院＂量刑建议＂工作,明确未成年人案件＂社会调查报告制度＂等,具有重要意义。然而,我国刑事审判采用＂案卷笔录中心主义＂,法官难以形成当庭决断,且量刑信息调查受多种因素制约,难以保证客观公正。此外法院检察院关于具体量刑处置的争议,尚无明确的解决思路,这都影响量刑程序改革实施效果。文章通过分析量刑程序改革中可能存在的不足,挖掘其进一步变革空间,并提出改进建议,以期能为量刑程序改革有所裨益。
최고인민법원등오부위우2010년10월1일첨발양형정서사법해석문건,학립＂상대독립양형정서＂,규범검찰원＂양형건의＂공작,명학미성년인안건＂사회조사보고제도＂등,구유중요의의。연이,아국형사심판채용＂안권필록중심주의＂,법관난이형성당정결단,차양형신식조사수다충인소제약,난이보증객관공정。차외법원검찰원관우구체양형처치적쟁의,상무명학적해결사로,저도영향양형정서개혁실시효과。문장통과분석양형정서개혁중가능존재적불족,알굴기진일보변혁공간,병제출개진건의,이기능위양형정서개혁유소비익。
Five ministries including the supreme people＇s court issued judicial interpretation of sentencing program on October 1,2010,establishing ＂relatively independent sentencing program＂,specifying procuratorate＇s ＂sentencing recommendations＂,making the minor case ＂social investigation report system＂ clear,which was significant.However,due to ＂case file record-centrism＂ in our criminal trial,it is difficult for the judger to form a decision in the court,and information about sentencing investigation is restricted by many factors,so it is difficult to ensure an objective and impartial decision.In addition,the disputes about specific sentencing between court and procuratorate have no clear solutions,which have affected the sentencing reform program implementation.By analyzing the shortage of the sentencing program reform the author explores further change space,and puts forward the improvement suggestions,hoping to be helpful to the sentencing program reform.