实用放射学杂志
實用放射學雜誌
실용방사학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL RADIOLOGY
2001年
2期
122-124
,共3页
赵玉锋%王瑞燕%冯乃华%毕宝林%杨效经%李云生
趙玉鋒%王瑞燕%馮迺華%畢寶林%楊效經%李雲生
조옥봉%왕서연%풍내화%필보림%양효경%리운생
肝肿瘤%介入治疗%植入药盒
肝腫瘤%介入治療%植入藥盒
간종류%개입치료%식입약합
目的:研究植入式导管药盒系统(PCS)在肝癌介入治疗中的应用价值。方法:229例介入治疗的原发性肝癌病例按不同介入治疗方法分为TACE组、PCS组和TAI组。对三组疗效和方法进行了对比分析。结果:PCS组缓解率虽然与TAI组无显著差异,但1,2年生存率却明显高于TAI组。但随着时间推移,生存率下降显著,与TAI的差异逐渐缩小,3年生存率两组已无明显差异,而TACE与上述两组的差异却越来越明显。结论:PCS在不能栓塞的肝癌介入治疗中有较好的应用价值。髂外动脉穿刺植入药盒优于股动脉及锁骨下动脉法。
目的:研究植入式導管藥盒繫統(PCS)在肝癌介入治療中的應用價值。方法:229例介入治療的原髮性肝癌病例按不同介入治療方法分為TACE組、PCS組和TAI組。對三組療效和方法進行瞭對比分析。結果:PCS組緩解率雖然與TAI組無顯著差異,但1,2年生存率卻明顯高于TAI組。但隨著時間推移,生存率下降顯著,與TAI的差異逐漸縮小,3年生存率兩組已無明顯差異,而TACE與上述兩組的差異卻越來越明顯。結論:PCS在不能栓塞的肝癌介入治療中有較好的應用價值。髂外動脈穿刺植入藥盒優于股動脈及鎖骨下動脈法。
목적:연구식입식도관약합계통(PCS)재간암개입치료중적응용개치。방법:229례개입치료적원발성간암병례안불동개입치료방법분위TACE조、PCS조화TAI조。대삼조료효화방법진행료대비분석。결과:PCS조완해솔수연여TAI조무현저차이,단1,2년생존솔각명현고우TAI조。단수착시간추이,생존솔하강현저,여TAI적차이축점축소,3년생존솔량조이무명현차이,이TACE여상술량조적차이각월래월명현。결론:PCS재불능전새적간암개입치료중유교호적응용개치。가외동맥천자식입약합우우고동맥급쇄골하동맥법。
Objective:To evaluate the applied value of the port and catheterconnecting system(PCS)in interventional treatment of hepatocarcinoma.Methods:Based on different interventional methods,all the 229 cases with primary hepatocarcinoma were divided into three groups:group TACE which were treated by chemoterapy and embolization,group PCS they managed with percutaneous femoral artery implantable reservior port and catheter connecting system;and group TAI which were treated with routine hepatic transarterial chemotherapy alone.Their curative effects and managing methods were analyzed.Results:The remission rate in group PCS was not any different as TAI,but the survival rate of 1 or 2 years in PCS was remarkably higher than those of group TAI (P<0.01 orP<0.05),the survival rate of 3 years in group PCS was not significantly different from that of group TAI(P>0.05),but in group TACE there were remarkably different from the other two groups with the time detayes.Conclusion:PCS is of highly value in treating hepatocarcinoma which can not be treated by embolism,The method of PCS through external iliac artery puncture is superior to that through femoral artery and subclavian artery puncture.