中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
中華耳鼻嚥喉頭頸外科雜誌
중화이비인후두경외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2009年
3期
197-202
,共6页
谢民强%龙镇%李仲汉%张宏征%杨钦泰%刘贤%张革化%史剑波%陈合新%许庚
謝民彊%龍鎮%李仲漢%張宏徵%楊欽泰%劉賢%張革化%史劍波%陳閤新%許庚
사민강%룡진%리중한%장굉정%양흠태%류현%장혁화%사검파%진합신%허경
视神经损伤%减压术,外科%内窥镜检查%治疗结果
視神經損傷%減壓術,外科%內窺鏡檢查%治療結果
시신경손상%감압술,외과%내규경검사%치료결과
Optic nerve injuries%Decompression,surgical%Endoscopy%Treatment outcome
目的 观察鼻内镜下视神经减压术治疗外伤性视神经损伤的疗效和最佳手术时间.方法 对1998年4月至2007年3月90例头部和(或)颌面外伤后发生93眼外伤性视神经损伤的患者进行回顾性分析.所有患者接受鼻内镜视神经减压术前对药物治疗均无反应或效果不佳.受伤至手术时间1~97 d,中位手术时间5.5 d.术前无视力71眼,有视力22眼(1眼光感,5眼眼前手动,13眼眼前指数,1眼视力0.04,2眼视力0.1).随访时间6 d~2年,中位随访时间8 d.结果 视神经减压术后35例(36眼,38.7%)视力有改善,53例(55眼,59.1%)无变化,2例(2眼,2.2%)视力下降.术前有视力的患者中,视力改善者达68.2%(15/22眼),外伤后立即或逐渐失明的患者中视力改善分别只有22.9%(8/35眼,仅2眼视力恢复到大于0.02)和36.1%(13/36眼,5眼视力恢复到大于0.02),术前有视力和无视力两组视力术后恢复差异非常显著(X2=11.864,P<0.01).无视力的患者中,伤后3 d内手术视力改善为41.2%(7/17眼),3 d后手术视力改善下降到25.9%(14/54眼),但两者之间差异无统计学意义(X2=1.46,P>0.05).不同受伤部位比较,视神经管内外侧壁同时骨折手术效果最好(55.6%,10/18眼),其次为内侧壁骨折(45.7%,21/46眼),最差为没有骨折(20%,4/20眼)和单纯外侧壁骨折患者(11.1%,1/9眼).结论 为了挽救患者视力,应尽早行鼻内镜视神经减压手术,即使伤后立即丧失视力也不要放弃手术治疗.但手术后所获得的满意的视力恢复仍然需要进一步研究.
目的 觀察鼻內鏡下視神經減壓術治療外傷性視神經損傷的療效和最佳手術時間.方法 對1998年4月至2007年3月90例頭部和(或)頜麵外傷後髮生93眼外傷性視神經損傷的患者進行迴顧性分析.所有患者接受鼻內鏡視神經減壓術前對藥物治療均無反應或效果不佳.受傷至手術時間1~97 d,中位手術時間5.5 d.術前無視力71眼,有視力22眼(1眼光感,5眼眼前手動,13眼眼前指數,1眼視力0.04,2眼視力0.1).隨訪時間6 d~2年,中位隨訪時間8 d.結果 視神經減壓術後35例(36眼,38.7%)視力有改善,53例(55眼,59.1%)無變化,2例(2眼,2.2%)視力下降.術前有視力的患者中,視力改善者達68.2%(15/22眼),外傷後立即或逐漸失明的患者中視力改善分彆隻有22.9%(8/35眼,僅2眼視力恢複到大于0.02)和36.1%(13/36眼,5眼視力恢複到大于0.02),術前有視力和無視力兩組視力術後恢複差異非常顯著(X2=11.864,P<0.01).無視力的患者中,傷後3 d內手術視力改善為41.2%(7/17眼),3 d後手術視力改善下降到25.9%(14/54眼),但兩者之間差異無統計學意義(X2=1.46,P>0.05).不同受傷部位比較,視神經管內外側壁同時骨摺手術效果最好(55.6%,10/18眼),其次為內側壁骨摺(45.7%,21/46眼),最差為沒有骨摺(20%,4/20眼)和單純外側壁骨摺患者(11.1%,1/9眼).結論 為瞭輓救患者視力,應儘早行鼻內鏡視神經減壓手術,即使傷後立即喪失視力也不要放棄手術治療.但手術後所穫得的滿意的視力恢複仍然需要進一步研究.
목적 관찰비내경하시신경감압술치료외상성시신경손상적료효화최가수술시간.방법 대1998년4월지2007년3월90례두부화(혹)합면외상후발생93안외상성시신경손상적환자진행회고성분석.소유환자접수비내경시신경감압술전대약물치료균무반응혹효과불가.수상지수술시간1~97 d,중위수술시간5.5 d.술전무시력71안,유시력22안(1안광감,5안안전수동,13안안전지수,1안시력0.04,2안시력0.1).수방시간6 d~2년,중위수방시간8 d.결과 시신경감압술후35례(36안,38.7%)시력유개선,53례(55안,59.1%)무변화,2례(2안,2.2%)시력하강.술전유시력적환자중,시력개선자체68.2%(15/22안),외상후립즉혹축점실명적환자중시력개선분별지유22.9%(8/35안,부2안시력회복도대우0.02)화36.1%(13/36안,5안시력회복도대우0.02),술전유시력화무시력량조시력술후회복차이비상현저(X2=11.864,P<0.01).무시력적환자중,상후3 d내수술시력개선위41.2%(7/17안),3 d후수술시력개선하강도25.9%(14/54안),단량자지간차이무통계학의의(X2=1.46,P>0.05).불동수상부위비교,시신경관내외측벽동시골절수술효과최호(55.6%,10/18안),기차위내측벽골절(45.7%,21/46안),최차위몰유골절(20%,4/20안)화단순외측벽골절환자(11.1%,1/9안).결론 위료만구환자시력,응진조행비내경시신경감압수술,즉사상후립즉상실시력야불요방기수술치료.단수술후소획득적만의적시력회복잉연수요진일보연구.
Objective To observe the optimal timing of operation and the therapeutic effect of endoscopic optic nerve decompression for traumatic optic neuropathy (TON). Methods The clinical records of 90 consecutive patients with TON (93 eyes) after head and/or maxillofacial trauma from April 1998 to March 2007 were reviewed and analyzed. All patients were either unresponsive or intolerant to medication before they underwent intranasal endoscopic optic nerve decompression. The time interval between the injury and operation ranged from one day to 97 days (median 5.5 days). Among the 93 eyes, there were 71 eyes with no visual acuity before operation and 22 eyes with residue visual acuity, including light perception in 1 eye, hand movement in 5 eyes, counting fingers in 13 eyes, 0.04 in 1 eye, and 0.1 in 2 eyes. Duration of follow-up ranged from 6 days to two years (median 8 days). Results After decompression, 35 patients (36/93 eyes, 38.7%) showed improvement of visual acuity, 53 patients (55 eyes, 59.1%) remained the same as before operation, while 2 patients (2 eyes, 2.2%) showed decreased visual acuity. Among patients with visual acuity beyond light perception before decompression, 68.2% of them (15/22 eyes) experienced visual improvement ,whereas only 22.9% (8/35 eyes, 0.02 in two eyes) among patients who lost visual acuity immediately after injury, and 36.1% (13/36 eyes, 0.02 in five eyes) among those who lost visual acuity gradually after injury. There was a significant difference in visual improvement between group with visual acuity and group with no visual acuity (X2 = 11. 864, P < 0.01). Among patients with no visual acuity, 41.2% of those (7/17 eyes) who underwent operation within 3 days of injury, experienced improvement in visual acuity, compared with 25.9% (14/54 eyes) for those who underwent the operation more than 3 days after injury. It was indicated that no significant difference in visual improvement between these two groups (X2 = 1.46, P > 0.05). When comparing different sites of fracture, the effect of surgery was the most desirable (55.6%, 10/18 eyes improved) if the fracture occurred simultaneously in both exterior and interior walls of optic canal, followed by the interior wall fracture (45.7%, 21/46 eyes). The operation was less effective if there was no fraction (20% , 4/20 eyes) or if the fracture occurred in exterior wall alone (11.1%, 1/9 eyes). Conclusions Endoscopic optic nerve decompression is a minimally invasive procedure with no adverse cosmetic effects. Early operation is recommended for saving vision, even though visual acuity is lost immediately after injury. However, the satisfactory clinical effects of endoscopic optic nerve decompression require further study.