中华普通外科杂志
中華普通外科雜誌
중화보통외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY
2009年
8期
631-633
,共3页
张柏林%徐晓洲%杨迅%郑闪%王仲照%吕宁%王翔%张保宁
張柏林%徐曉洲%楊迅%鄭閃%王仲照%呂寧%王翔%張保寧
장백림%서효주%양신%정섬%왕중조%려저%왕상%장보저
乳腺肿瘤%活组织检查%免疫组织化学
乳腺腫瘤%活組織檢查%免疫組織化學
유선종류%활조직검사%면역조직화학
Breast neoplasms%Biopsy%Immunohistochemistry
目的 评价核心针活检(core needle biopsy,CNB)诊断乳腺病变的准确率和浸润性乳腺癌化疗前、后雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)、孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)和Her2蛋白免疫组织化学(immunohistochemistry,IHC)检测结果的一致性.方法 回顾性分析本院2005年6月至2008年4月间进行的516例CNB结果.结果 本组所有资料均由两位病理医生独立进行病理学诊断.共诊断乳腺恶件肿瘤、原位癌和叶状肿瘤484例,灵敏度为96.7%.经手术活检证实的假阴性为16例(3.3%).CNB诊断准确率不受病灶最大径影响(P=0.423).接受化疗前、后IHC检测的乳腺癌ER、PR和Her2一致率分别为90.3%、76.8%和82.5%.结论 CNB是准确、有效的检查方法.受乳腺癌的组织异质性和治疗的双苇影响,化疗前后的ER、PR和Her2检测的一致性尚难获得满意结果.
目的 評價覈心針活檢(core needle biopsy,CNB)診斷乳腺病變的準確率和浸潤性乳腺癌化療前、後雌激素受體(estrogen receptor,ER)、孕激素受體(progesterone receptor,PR)和Her2蛋白免疫組織化學(immunohistochemistry,IHC)檢測結果的一緻性.方法 迴顧性分析本院2005年6月至2008年4月間進行的516例CNB結果.結果 本組所有資料均由兩位病理醫生獨立進行病理學診斷.共診斷乳腺噁件腫瘤、原位癌和葉狀腫瘤484例,靈敏度為96.7%.經手術活檢證實的假陰性為16例(3.3%).CNB診斷準確率不受病竈最大徑影響(P=0.423).接受化療前、後IHC檢測的乳腺癌ER、PR和Her2一緻率分彆為90.3%、76.8%和82.5%.結論 CNB是準確、有效的檢查方法.受乳腺癌的組織異質性和治療的雙葦影響,化療前後的ER、PR和Her2檢測的一緻性尚難穫得滿意結果.
목적 평개핵심침활검(core needle biopsy,CNB)진단유선병변적준학솔화침윤성유선암화료전、후자격소수체(estrogen receptor,ER)、잉격소수체(progesterone receptor,PR)화Her2단백면역조직화학(immunohistochemistry,IHC)검측결과적일치성.방법 회고성분석본원2005년6월지2008년4월간진행적516례CNB결과.결과 본조소유자료균유량위병리의생독립진행병이학진단.공진단유선악건종류、원위암화협상종류484례,령민도위96.7%.경수술활검증실적가음성위16례(3.3%).CNB진단준학솔불수병조최대경영향(P=0.423).접수화료전、후IHC검측적유선암ER、PR화Her2일치솔분별위90.3%、76.8%화82.5%.결론 CNB시준학、유효적검사방법.수유선암적조직이질성화치료적쌍위영향,화료전후적ER、PR화Her2검측적일치성상난획득만의결과.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing breast masses and its coherence with immunohistochemical (IHC) examination results of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Her2 protein between pre-and post-chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer. Methods The results of 516 CNB cases from June, 2005 to April, 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. The pathological examination was performed by two pathologists independently. Results 484 cases of malignant tumor, carcinoma in situ and phyllodes tumor were found in this group with the sensitivity of 96.7%. Sixteen cases of false negative (3. 3% ) were demonstrated by surgical biopsy. The accurate rate of CNB was not influenced by the maximum diameter of masses ( P = O. 423 ). The agreement rate of IHC results of ER, PgR and Her2 between pre- and post-chemotherapy were 90. 3%, 76. 8% and 82.5%, respectively. Conclusion CNB is a useful diagnostic method with a satisfactory accuracy in any size of breast masses. Given the histological heterogeneity of invasive breast cancer and the influence of ehemotherapy, the coherence of prechemotherapy IHC for ER, PgR and Her2 is not optimal with that of post-chemotherapy.