中华胸心血管外科杂志
中華胸心血管外科雜誌
중화흉심혈관외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2010年
6期
385-388
,共4页
阳晟%黄方炯%范占明%李志忠%杜嘉会%张兆光%许尚栋
暘晟%黃方炯%範佔明%李誌忠%杜嘉會%張兆光%許尚棟
양성%황방형%범점명%리지충%두가회%장조광%허상동
主动脉瘤,夹层%心脏外科手术%主动脉腔内修复术
主動脈瘤,夾層%心髒外科手術%主動脈腔內脩複術
주동맥류,협층%심장외과수술%주동맥강내수복술
Aneurysm,dissecting%Cardiac surgical procedures%Thoracic endovascular aortic repair
目的 总结主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗慢性B型主动脉夹层的临床经验.方法 2001年6月至2007年9月,84例慢性B型主动脉夹层病人接受了 TEVAR.从起病至实施TEVAR为1~120个月,平均(13.9±22.0)个月.随访6~86个月,平均(33.2±19.2)个月.结果 腔内修复术中,破口被完全封闭77例,内漏发生率为8.3%.1个月的病死率为1.2%.1例在术后1个月发生逆行A型主动脉夹层,行急诊升主动脉和主动脉弓置换术.4例实施了第2次TEVAR,其中3例为封堵内漏,另1例是覆膜支架远端出现新的内膜撕裂.7例在随访期内死亡(8.4%),其中3例死于内漏引起的胸主动脉破裂,1例腹主动脉持续性扩张导致降主动脉破裂死亡,另2例死因与主动脉夹层无关,还有1例死因不详.K-M生存曲线分析显示7年生存率为84.4%.结论 早期和中期随访结果显示,TEVAR治疗慢性B型主动脉夹层是有效的.内漏是随访期的主要死因.随着外科医师经验的积累以及覆膜支架的改进,TEVAR会有更好的疗效.
目的 總結主動脈腔內脩複術(TEVAR)治療慢性B型主動脈夾層的臨床經驗.方法 2001年6月至2007年9月,84例慢性B型主動脈夾層病人接受瞭 TEVAR.從起病至實施TEVAR為1~120箇月,平均(13.9±22.0)箇月.隨訪6~86箇月,平均(33.2±19.2)箇月.結果 腔內脩複術中,破口被完全封閉77例,內漏髮生率為8.3%.1箇月的病死率為1.2%.1例在術後1箇月髮生逆行A型主動脈夾層,行急診升主動脈和主動脈弓置換術.4例實施瞭第2次TEVAR,其中3例為封堵內漏,另1例是覆膜支架遠耑齣現新的內膜撕裂.7例在隨訪期內死亡(8.4%),其中3例死于內漏引起的胸主動脈破裂,1例腹主動脈持續性擴張導緻降主動脈破裂死亡,另2例死因與主動脈夾層無關,還有1例死因不詳.K-M生存麯線分析顯示7年生存率為84.4%.結論 早期和中期隨訪結果顯示,TEVAR治療慢性B型主動脈夾層是有效的.內漏是隨訪期的主要死因.隨著外科醫師經驗的積纍以及覆膜支架的改進,TEVAR會有更好的療效.
목적 총결주동맥강내수복술(TEVAR)치료만성B형주동맥협층적림상경험.방법 2001년6월지2007년9월,84례만성B형주동맥협층병인접수료 TEVAR.종기병지실시TEVAR위1~120개월,평균(13.9±22.0)개월.수방6~86개월,평균(33.2±19.2)개월.결과 강내수복술중,파구피완전봉폐77례,내루발생솔위8.3%.1개월적병사솔위1.2%.1례재술후1개월발생역행A형주동맥협층,행급진승주동맥화주동맥궁치환술.4례실시료제2차TEVAR,기중3례위봉도내루,령1례시복막지가원단출현신적내막시렬.7례재수방기내사망(8.4%),기중3례사우내루인기적흉주동맥파렬,1례복주동맥지속성확장도치강주동맥파렬사망,령2례사인여주동맥협층무관,환유1례사인불상.K-M생존곡선분석현시7년생존솔위84.4%.결론 조기화중기수방결과현시,TEVAR치료만성B형주동맥협층시유효적.내루시수방기적주요사인.수착외과의사경험적적루이급복막지가적개진,TEVAR회유경호적료효.
Objective The optimal treatment for chronic type B dissection remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to report early and mid-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of chronic type B aortic dissection. Methods Methods From June 2001 to September 2007, 84 patients with chronic type B aortic dissection received TEVAR. The time between onset of dissection and TEVAR was (13.9 ± 22.0) months (ranged 1 - 120 months). All patients were followed for 6 - 86 months [mean (33.2 ± 19.2) months]. Results The entry tear was completely sealed in 77 cases ( 91.7% ) during TEVAR. The incidence of incomplete seal was 8.3%. One-month mortality was 1. 2%. One patient had retrograde type A dissection 1 month after operation. Four patients received a second TEVAR during follow-up :3 for endoleaking and 1 for newly formed intima tear. Seven patients (8.3%) died during follow-up: 3 thoracic aorta rupture due to endoleaking, 1 abdominal aorta rupture caused by continuous dilation of the abdominal aorta, unrelated to aortic dissection deaths in 2 and 1 died of unknown cause. The Kaplan Meier actuarial survival curve showed a 7-year survival rate of 84.4%. Conclusion Early and mid-term results showed that TEVAR was effective in treating chronic type B aortic dissection. Endoleak was the main cause of death during follow-up. With increasing of physician's experience and refinement of the stent-graft, results are likely to improve in the future.