CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨分组负责制技能训练法在急诊护士在职培训中的应用与效果.方法将2008-2009年我科参与培训的护士随机分为两组,对照组采用的是传统培训法,实验组采用的是分组负责制技能训练法,比较两组受训者在培训普及率、达标率、教育与培训能力、专科技能掌握程度方面的差异.结果实验组人员在专科操作知识和技能掌握程度、教学能力方法均优于对照组,两者的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01).结论分组负责制技能训练法,针对急诊专科技能实践性强,弹性调节培训人员及时间,培训者根据受训者层级灵活调整训练重点,因人施教,符合在职培训按层级培训的要求,值得临床推广应用.
목적 탐토분조부책제기능훈련법재급진호사재직배훈중적응용여효과.방법 장2008-2009년아과삼여배훈적호사수궤분위량조,대조조채용적시전통배훈법,실험조채용적시분조부책제기능훈련법,비교량조수훈자재배훈보급솔、체표솔、교육여배훈능력、전과기능장악정도방면적차이.결과 실험조인원재전과조작지식화기능장악정도、교학능력방법균우우대조조,량자적차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05혹P<0.01).결론 분조부책제기능훈련법,침대급진전과기능실천성강,탄성조절배훈인원급시간,배훈자근거수훈자층급령활조정훈련중점,인인시교,부합재직배훈안층급배훈적요구,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of a skill training method which brings in a system of grouping responsibility for the on-the-job training of the emergency nurses. Methods Nurses who enrolled in the training program at the emergency department during the period from 2008 to 2009 were randomly divided into two groups. The control group (group A) was trained in a traditional way. Grouping responsibility system was employed in the experimental group (group B). The differences of parameters such as training popularity rate, attainment rate, the capability of education and training, as well as the mastery of professional skills were compared between the two groups. Results All the parameters were significantly higher in the experimental group than the control group. There were significant differences between the two groups ( P < 0. 05 or P < 0.01). Conclusions The grouping responsibility training system showed obvious advantages considering its flexible training staff and time as well as differential treatment in education. The results supported the view that this training method presented strong practicability for specific skills of emergency department and should be extended in clinical application.