中华妇产科杂志
中華婦產科雜誌
중화부산과잡지
CHINESE JOUNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
2012年
8期
608-611
,共4页
张迎辉%鲁永鲜%刘昕%沈文洁%刘静霞
張迎輝%魯永鮮%劉昕%瀋文潔%劉靜霞
장영휘%로영선%류흔%침문길%류정하
盆腔器官脱垂%聚丙烯类%外科网%妇科外科手术%生活质量
盆腔器官脫垂%聚丙烯類%外科網%婦科外科手術%生活質量
분강기관탈수%취병희류%외과망%부과외과수술%생활질량
Pelvic organ prolapse%Polypropylenes%Surgical mesh%Gynecologic surgical procedures%Quality of life
目的 探讨盆底重建术后阴道聚丙烯网片暴露对重度盆腔器官脱垂患者生命质最的影响.方法 2004年5月至2011年3月解放军总医院第一附属医院妇产科采用经阴道聚丙烯网片盆底重建术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂患者114例,分别于术后2、6及12个月时进行随访,并根据有无阴道网片暴露分为暴露组和非暴露组.采用盆底功能障碍问卷简表( PFDI-20)以及盆底功能影响问卷简表( PFIQ-7)对两组患者的生命质量进行评价.结果 术后2个月共96例患者获得随访,其中暴露组19例,非暴露组77例,网片暴露率19.8% (19/96);术后6个月共85例患者获得随访,其中暴露组13例,非暴露组72例,网片暴露率15.3% (13/85);术后12个月共77例患者获得随访,其中暴露组6例,非暴露组71例,网片暴露率7.8% (6/77).暴露组术前PFDI-20与PFIQ-7评分分别为39.6、57.1分,术后2个月分别为8.3、9.5分,术后6个月分别为8.3、9.5分,术后12个月分别为2.1、0分,手术后各时间点分别与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).非暴露组术前PFDI-20与PFIQ-7评分分别为54.2、66.7分,术后2个月分别为8.3、4.8分,术后6个月和12个月均为0分,与暴露组手术前、后各时间点分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 经阴道聚丙烯网片盆底重建术后发生阴道网片暴露较为常见,但并不显著影响患者的生命质量.
目的 探討盆底重建術後陰道聚丙烯網片暴露對重度盆腔器官脫垂患者生命質最的影響.方法 2004年5月至2011年3月解放軍總醫院第一附屬醫院婦產科採用經陰道聚丙烯網片盆底重建術治療重度盆腔器官脫垂患者114例,分彆于術後2、6及12箇月時進行隨訪,併根據有無陰道網片暴露分為暴露組和非暴露組.採用盆底功能障礙問捲簡錶( PFDI-20)以及盆底功能影響問捲簡錶( PFIQ-7)對兩組患者的生命質量進行評價.結果 術後2箇月共96例患者穫得隨訪,其中暴露組19例,非暴露組77例,網片暴露率19.8% (19/96);術後6箇月共85例患者穫得隨訪,其中暴露組13例,非暴露組72例,網片暴露率15.3% (13/85);術後12箇月共77例患者穫得隨訪,其中暴露組6例,非暴露組71例,網片暴露率7.8% (6/77).暴露組術前PFDI-20與PFIQ-7評分分彆為39.6、57.1分,術後2箇月分彆為8.3、9.5分,術後6箇月分彆為8.3、9.5分,術後12箇月分彆為2.1、0分,手術後各時間點分彆與術前比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.01).非暴露組術前PFDI-20與PFIQ-7評分分彆為54.2、66.7分,術後2箇月分彆為8.3、4.8分,術後6箇月和12箇月均為0分,與暴露組手術前、後各時間點分彆比較,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 經陰道聚丙烯網片盆底重建術後髮生陰道網片暴露較為常見,但併不顯著影響患者的生命質量.
목적 탐토분저중건술후음도취병희망편폭로대중도분강기관탈수환자생명질최적영향.방법 2004년5월지2011년3월해방군총의원제일부속의원부산과채용경음도취병희망편분저중건술치료중도분강기관탈수환자114례,분별우술후2、6급12개월시진행수방,병근거유무음도망편폭로분위폭로조화비폭로조.채용분저공능장애문권간표( PFDI-20)이급분저공능영향문권간표( PFIQ-7)대량조환자적생명질량진행평개.결과 술후2개월공96례환자획득수방,기중폭로조19례,비폭로조77례,망편폭로솔19.8% (19/96);술후6개월공85례환자획득수방,기중폭로조13례,비폭로조72례,망편폭로솔15.3% (13/85);술후12개월공77례환자획득수방,기중폭로조6례,비폭로조71례,망편폭로솔7.8% (6/77).폭로조술전PFDI-20여PFIQ-7평분분별위39.6、57.1분,술후2개월분별위8.3、9.5분,술후6개월분별위8.3、9.5분,술후12개월분별위2.1、0분,수술후각시간점분별여술전비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.01).비폭로조술전PFDI-20여PFIQ-7평분분별위54.2、66.7분,술후2개월분별위8.3、4.8분,술후6개월화12개월균위0분,여폭로조수술전、후각시간점분별비교,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 경음도취병희망편분저중건술후발생음도망편폭로교위상견,단병불현저영향환자적생명질량.
Objective To study the impact of vaginal mesh exposure on quality of life in patients undergoing transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery (RPS) with polypropylene mesh.Methods From May 2004 to March 2011,114 patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse(POP) undergoing transvaginal RPS with polypropylene mesh were enrolled in this study,which were divided into exposure and non-exposure group according to appearing vaginal mesh exposure at 2 months,6 months and 1 year after operation.At the same time,pelvic floor distress inventory short form 20 ( PFD1-20 ) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire short form 7 ( PFIQ-7 ) were completed in those patients.Results At 2 months after operation,96 patients were followed up,including 19 patients in exposure group and 77 patients in non-exposure group,and the rate of exposure was 19.8c (19/96); At 6 months after operation,85 patients were followed up,including 13 patients in exposure group and 72 patients in non-exposure group,and the rate of exposure was 15.3%( 13/85 ) ; At 1 vear after operation,77 patients were followed up,including 6 patients in exposure group and 71 patients in non-exposure group,and the rate of exposure was 7.8% (6/77).Mean score of PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 in exposure group before operation was 39.6 and 57.1,which was statistically improved to 8.3 and 9.5 at 2 months after operation,8.3 and 9.5 at 6 months after operation,2.1 and 0 in I year after operation (P <0.01 ). Mean score of PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 of non-exposure group before operation was 54.2 and 66.7,which was improved to 8.3 and 4.8 at 2 months after operation,0 at 6 months and 1 vear after operation,but there was no significant difference in mean score of PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 between the two groups (P > 0.05 ).Conclusion Vaginal mesh exposure was common after transvaginal RPS with polypropylene mesh,however,most of them were moderate,and there was no significant impact on patients'qualifies of life.