中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2008年
3期
151-153
,共3页
周欣%马琦%尹兴喆%张成飞
週訢%馬琦%尹興喆%張成飛
주흔%마기%윤흥철%장성비
牙髓腔%根管制备%牙科高速技术
牙髓腔%根管製備%牙科高速技術
아수강%근관제비%아과고속기술
Dental pulp cavity%Root canal preparation%Dental high-speed technique
目的 评价3种常用根管预备方法对C形根管的成形效果,为临床治疗提供参考.方法 对临床拔除的具有C形根管的下颌第二恒磨牙60颗,应用改良Bramante技术,于距根尖2mm、5 mm和8mm处将牙根横断.选择手用不锈钢K锉逐步后退技术(Step-Back组)、逐步深入技术(Step-Down组)和机用旋转镍钛锉ProTaperTM系列冠向下预备技术(Crown-Down组)预备不同类型的C形根管,比较预备前后根管横截面形态的数码图像,对3种不同方法的成形效果进行评价.结果 3种方法预备离体下颌第二磨牙C形根管后均有遗漏.不锈钢K锉逐步后退技术和不锈钢K锉逐步深入技术分别在根冠部[遗漏面积百分比分别为(0.177±0.071)%、(0.068±0.074)%]和根尖部[遗漏面积百分比分别为(0.236±0.167)%、(0.295±0.171)%]遗漏较少(P<0.05).CⅠ、CⅡ型遗漏出现在近远中多于颊舌侧,将其分为独立的2~3个根管预备可减少遗漏.不同方法预备根尖区的遗漏均显著高于根管中上部(P<0.05).结论 早期开敞根管上段,将C形根管分为2~3个独立的根管进行预备,可以增进根管预备的成形效果.
目的 評價3種常用根管預備方法對C形根管的成形效果,為臨床治療提供參攷.方法 對臨床拔除的具有C形根管的下頜第二恆磨牙60顆,應用改良Bramante技術,于距根尖2mm、5 mm和8mm處將牙根橫斷.選擇手用不鏽鋼K銼逐步後退技術(Step-Back組)、逐步深入技術(Step-Down組)和機用鏇轉鎳鈦銼ProTaperTM繫列冠嚮下預備技術(Crown-Down組)預備不同類型的C形根管,比較預備前後根管橫截麵形態的數碼圖像,對3種不同方法的成形效果進行評價.結果 3種方法預備離體下頜第二磨牙C形根管後均有遺漏.不鏽鋼K銼逐步後退技術和不鏽鋼K銼逐步深入技術分彆在根冠部[遺漏麵積百分比分彆為(0.177±0.071)%、(0.068±0.074)%]和根尖部[遺漏麵積百分比分彆為(0.236±0.167)%、(0.295±0.171)%]遺漏較少(P<0.05).CⅠ、CⅡ型遺漏齣現在近遠中多于頰舌側,將其分為獨立的2~3箇根管預備可減少遺漏.不同方法預備根尖區的遺漏均顯著高于根管中上部(P<0.05).結論 早期開敞根管上段,將C形根管分為2~3箇獨立的根管進行預備,可以增進根管預備的成形效果.
목적 평개3충상용근관예비방법대C형근관적성형효과,위림상치료제공삼고.방법 대림상발제적구유C형근관적하합제이항마아60과,응용개량Bramante기술,우거근첨2mm、5 mm화8mm처장아근횡단.선택수용불수강K촤축보후퇴기술(Step-Back조)、축보심입기술(Step-Down조)화궤용선전얼태촤ProTaperTM계렬관향하예비기술(Crown-Down조)예비불동류형적C형근관,비교예비전후근관횡절면형태적수마도상,대3충불동방법적성형효과진행평개.결과 3충방법예비리체하합제이마아C형근관후균유유루.불수강K촤축보후퇴기술화불수강K촤축보심입기술분별재근관부[유루면적백분비분별위(0.177±0.071)%、(0.068±0.074)%]화근첨부[유루면적백분비분별위(0.236±0.167)%、(0.295±0.171)%]유루교소(P<0.05).CⅠ、CⅡ형유루출현재근원중다우협설측,장기분위독립적2~3개근관예비가감소유루.불동방법예비근첨구적유루균현저고우근관중상부(P<0.05).결론 조기개창근관상단,장C형근관분위2~3개독립적근관진행예비,가이증진근관예비적성형효과.
Objective To investigate the shaping efficiency of three instrumentation techniques in the C-shaped canals.Methods Sixty extracted mandibular second molars with C-shaped canals were selected and cross-sectioned at 2,5,8 mm from the apex by using a muffle system as described by Bramante.The teeth containing C-shaped canals were randomly divided into three groups,respectively instrumented using stainless steel K-files in step-back and step-down techniques.and ProTaperTM series in crown-down technique.The digital images of canal cross-sections pre-and post-instrumentation were photographed to evaluate the proportion and position of uninstrumented area.Working length loss and perforation were recorded.Data were analyzed using ANOVA.Results Step-down technique gained smaller uninstrumented area in the coronal third of the canals,while step-beck technique gained the same results in the apical third(P<0.05).Uninstrumented proportion in apical part was significantly higher than in the middle and the coronal(P<0.05).Instrumenting type Ⅰ canal as 2 or 3 separated canals Was likely to reduce the miss.There were three perforations in manual stainless steel K-file groups.Conclusions Early opening the coronal part of C-shaped canal,shaping C-shaped canal as two or three separated canals and instrumenting the apical part with step-back technique,seemed to be the effective methods to avoid miss.