语文学刊(外语教育教学)
語文學刊(外語教育教學)
어문학간(외어교육교학)
LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE LEARNING
2010年
7期
43-45
,共3页
《四签名》%殖民话语%东方主义%殖民主义
《四籤名》%殖民話語%東方主義%殖民主義
《사첨명》%식민화어%동방주의%식민주의
The Sign of Four%colonial discourse%orientalism%colonialism
通过分析表明,<四签名>中的殖民话语体现在对印度文化的贬低以及对印度当地人的非人性化描写中.把印度人描写成未开化的野蛮人而把殖民主义者美化为文明和民主的化身.使殖民地国家的对外殖民扩张合理化、合法化,从而建立文化霸权.
通過分析錶明,<四籤名>中的殖民話語體現在對印度文化的貶低以及對印度噹地人的非人性化描寫中.把印度人描寫成未開化的野蠻人而把殖民主義者美化為文明和民主的化身.使殖民地國傢的對外殖民擴張閤理化、閤法化,從而建立文化霸權.
통과분석표명,<사첨명>중적식민화어체현재대인도문화적폄저이급대인도당지인적비인성화묘사중.파인도인묘사성미개화적야만인이파식민주의자미화위문명화민주적화신.사식민지국가적대외식민확장합이화、합법화,종이건립문화패권.
The paper critically examines the Sign of Four as an imperialistic novel incorporating colonial discourse which aims to defile Indian culture in order to achieve its political purposes. Depicting the native Indians as uncivilized savages and the colonizers as carriers of the banners of western civilization and democracy, the Sign of Four attempts to justify and glorify British colonization in India.