中华消化外科杂志
中華消化外科雜誌
중화소화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY
2010年
5期
353-356
,共4页
王伟%孙岳平%易静%王坚
王偉%孫嶽平%易靜%王堅
왕위%손악평%역정%왕견
胰腺肿瘤%大黄素%多药耐药%化疗%BXPC-3细胞株
胰腺腫瘤%大黃素%多藥耐藥%化療%BXPC-3細胞株
이선종류%대황소%다약내약%화료%BXPC-3세포주
Pancreatic neoplasms%Emodin%Multidrug resistance%Chemotherapy%BXPC-3 cells
目的 探讨大黄素能否提高胰腺癌细胞化疗敏感性及其作用机制.方法 设立对照组(正常人皮肤成纤维细胞/胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞),顺铂组(5 mg/L),吉西他滨组(0.5 μmol/L),大黄素与顺铂联合组(50 μmol/L、5 mg/L),大黄素与吉西他滨联合组(50 μmol/L、0.5 μmol/L).应用MTT法检测细胞存活率,流式细胞仪检测细胞凋亡率,RT-PCR法检测不同细胞株中多药耐药相关蛋白1(MRP1)、多药耐药相关蛋白2(MRP2)、乳腺癌耐药蛋白(BCRP)和P-糖蛋白(P-gp)mRNA的表达.采用t检验比较两组差异.结果 顺铂组胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞的存活率和凋亡率分别为62.44%±3.42%和27.10%±4.24%,大黄素与顺铂联合组胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞的存活率和凋亡率分别为30.53%±0.05%和66.33%±9.37%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=13.20,5.35,P<0.05).吉西他滨组胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞的存活率和凋亡率分别为79.82%±2.83%和13.48%±1.65%,大黄素与吉西他滨联合组胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞的存活率和凋亡率分别为45.65%±2.46%和62.74%±10.18%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=12.89,8.28,P<0.05).顺铂组和大黄素与顺铂联合组正常人皮肤成纤维细胞存活率比较,差异无统计学意义(t=2.08,P>0.05).吉西他滨组和大黄素与吉西他滨联合组正常人皮肤成纤维细胞存活率比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.64,P>0.05).在胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞中,只能检测到MRP1 mRNA的表达,未能检测到MRP2、BCRP、P-gp mRNA的表达.顺铂组胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞的MRP1 mRNA表达水平显著降低,而大黄素与顺铂联合组胰腺癌BXPC-3细胞的MRP1 mRNA表达水平则进一步下调.结论 大黄素能够提高胰腺癌细胞对顺铂的敏感性,其机制与下调的MRP1 mRNA表达有关.
目的 探討大黃素能否提高胰腺癌細胞化療敏感性及其作用機製.方法 設立對照組(正常人皮膚成纖維細胞/胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞),順鉑組(5 mg/L),吉西他濱組(0.5 μmol/L),大黃素與順鉑聯閤組(50 μmol/L、5 mg/L),大黃素與吉西他濱聯閤組(50 μmol/L、0.5 μmol/L).應用MTT法檢測細胞存活率,流式細胞儀檢測細胞凋亡率,RT-PCR法檢測不同細胞株中多藥耐藥相關蛋白1(MRP1)、多藥耐藥相關蛋白2(MRP2)、乳腺癌耐藥蛋白(BCRP)和P-糖蛋白(P-gp)mRNA的錶達.採用t檢驗比較兩組差異.結果 順鉑組胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞的存活率和凋亡率分彆為62.44%±3.42%和27.10%±4.24%,大黃素與順鉑聯閤組胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞的存活率和凋亡率分彆為30.53%±0.05%和66.33%±9.37%,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(t=13.20,5.35,P<0.05).吉西他濱組胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞的存活率和凋亡率分彆為79.82%±2.83%和13.48%±1.65%,大黃素與吉西他濱聯閤組胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞的存活率和凋亡率分彆為45.65%±2.46%和62.74%±10.18%,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(t=12.89,8.28,P<0.05).順鉑組和大黃素與順鉑聯閤組正常人皮膚成纖維細胞存活率比較,差異無統計學意義(t=2.08,P>0.05).吉西他濱組和大黃素與吉西他濱聯閤組正常人皮膚成纖維細胞存活率比較,差異無統計學意義(t=0.64,P>0.05).在胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞中,隻能檢測到MRP1 mRNA的錶達,未能檢測到MRP2、BCRP、P-gp mRNA的錶達.順鉑組胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞的MRP1 mRNA錶達水平顯著降低,而大黃素與順鉑聯閤組胰腺癌BXPC-3細胞的MRP1 mRNA錶達水平則進一步下調.結論 大黃素能夠提高胰腺癌細胞對順鉑的敏感性,其機製與下調的MRP1 mRNA錶達有關.
목적 탐토대황소능부제고이선암세포화료민감성급기작용궤제.방법 설립대조조(정상인피부성섬유세포/이선암BXPC-3세포),순박조(5 mg/L),길서타빈조(0.5 μmol/L),대황소여순박연합조(50 μmol/L、5 mg/L),대황소여길서타빈연합조(50 μmol/L、0.5 μmol/L).응용MTT법검측세포존활솔,류식세포의검측세포조망솔,RT-PCR법검측불동세포주중다약내약상관단백1(MRP1)、다약내약상관단백2(MRP2)、유선암내약단백(BCRP)화P-당단백(P-gp)mRNA적표체.채용t검험비교량조차이.결과 순박조이선암BXPC-3세포적존활솔화조망솔분별위62.44%±3.42%화27.10%±4.24%,대황소여순박연합조이선암BXPC-3세포적존활솔화조망솔분별위30.53%±0.05%화66.33%±9.37%,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(t=13.20,5.35,P<0.05).길서타빈조이선암BXPC-3세포적존활솔화조망솔분별위79.82%±2.83%화13.48%±1.65%,대황소여길서타빈연합조이선암BXPC-3세포적존활솔화조망솔분별위45.65%±2.46%화62.74%±10.18%,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(t=12.89,8.28,P<0.05).순박조화대황소여순박연합조정상인피부성섬유세포존활솔비교,차이무통계학의의(t=2.08,P>0.05).길서타빈조화대황소여길서타빈연합조정상인피부성섬유세포존활솔비교,차이무통계학의의(t=0.64,P>0.05).재이선암BXPC-3세포중,지능검측도MRP1 mRNA적표체,미능검측도MRP2、BCRP、P-gp mRNA적표체.순박조이선암BXPC-3세포적MRP1 mRNA표체수평현저강저,이대황소여순박연합조이선암BXPC-3세포적MRP1 mRNA표체수평칙진일보하조.결론 대황소능구제고이선암세포대순박적민감성,기궤제여하조적MRP1 mRNA표체유관.
Objective To investigate whether emodin enhances chemosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells and the mechanism. Methods Normal human skin fibroblasts and pancreatic BXPC-3 cells were divided into control group, cisplatin (5 mg/L) treatment group, gemcitabine (0.5 μmol/L) treatment group, emodin (50 μmol/L)+ cisplatin (5 mg/L) co-treatment group and emodin (50 μmol/L) + gemcitabine (0.5 μmol/L) co-treatmentgroup. The cell viability was detected by MTT assay, the cell apoptosis rate by flow cytometry, the expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 ( MRP1 ), MRP2, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) mRNA in different cell lines was determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.All data were analyzed using the t test. Results The cell viability and apoptosis rate of pancreatic BXPC-3 cells after treatment were 62.44% ± 3.42% and 27. 10% ± 4.24% in the cisplatin treatment group, and they were 30.53% ±0.05% and 66.33% ±9.37% in the emodin + cisplatin co-treatment group. There were significant differences in cell viability and apoptosis rate between the two groups (t = 13.20, 5. 35, P < 0.05 ). The cell viability and apoptosis rate of pancreatic BXPC-3 cells after treatment were 79.82% ±2.83% and 13.48% ± 1.65%in the gemcitabine treatment group, and they were 45.65% ± 2.46% and 62.74% ± 10. 18% in the emodin +gemcitabine co-treatment group. There were significant differences in cell viability and apoptosis rate between the two groups (t = 12.89, 8.28, P < 0. 05 ). There was no significant difference in the viability of normal human skin fibroblasts between the cisplatin treatment group and the emodin + cisplatin co-treatment group, and also between the gemcitabine treatment group and the emodin + gemcitabine co-treatment group (t = 2. 08, 0. 64, P >0.05 ). Expression of MRP1 mRNA was detected in pancreatic BXPC-3 cells, whereas the expression of MRP2,BCRP and P-gp mRNA was undetectable. The expression of MRP1 mRNA in pancreatic BXPC-3 cells was significantly down-regulated in the cisplatin treatment group, and cisplatin + emodin co-treatment had an additive effect on down-regulating the expression of MRP1 mRNA. Conclusion Emodin may enhance chemosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to cisplatin by down-regulating the expression of MRP1 mRNA.