齐鲁护理杂志
齊魯護理雜誌
제로호리잡지
JOURNAL OF QILU NURSING
2009年
12期
1-2
,共2页
苏建薇%叶翠玲%梁清梅%林栩雁%黄伟钊
囌建薇%葉翠玲%樑清梅%林栩雁%黃偉釗
소건미%협취령%량청매%림허안%황위쇠
乳腺肿瘤%改良根治术%皮瓣%护理
乳腺腫瘤%改良根治術%皮瓣%護理
유선종류%개량근치술%피판%호리
Breast neoplasms%Modified radical mastectomy%Skin flap%Nursing
目的:探讨不同皮瓣护理方法对乳腺癌改良根治术后皮瓣恢复和患者舒适度的影响.方法:将158例患者随机分为对照组97例和实验组61例,对照组采用传统加压包扎皮辩护理,实验组采用不加压皮瓣护理.比较两组术后前3 d引流量、拔管天数、皮下积液、皮瓣坏死、切口愈合、皮肤损伤程度及舒适度评分等的差异.结果:两组术后拔管天数、皮下积液、皮瓣坏死及切口1期愈合的发生率比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05).但实验组术后前3 d的引流量明显少于对照组(P<0.01);患者术后24 h及72 h舒适度评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.01);术后术野以外皮肤红肿发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.01),皮肤水泡发生率低于对照组(P<0.05).结论:无加压的皮辩护理可取得与传统加压包扎相同的疗效,且具有操作简单、患者感觉舒适、便于观察等优点.
目的:探討不同皮瓣護理方法對乳腺癌改良根治術後皮瓣恢複和患者舒適度的影響.方法:將158例患者隨機分為對照組97例和實驗組61例,對照組採用傳統加壓包扎皮辯護理,實驗組採用不加壓皮瓣護理.比較兩組術後前3 d引流量、拔管天數、皮下積液、皮瓣壞死、切口愈閤、皮膚損傷程度及舒適度評分等的差異.結果:兩組術後拔管天數、皮下積液、皮瓣壞死及切口1期愈閤的髮生率比較均無顯著性差異(P>0.05).但實驗組術後前3 d的引流量明顯少于對照組(P<0.01);患者術後24 h及72 h舒適度評分均明顯高于對照組(P<0.01);術後術野以外皮膚紅腫髮生率明顯低于對照組(P<0.01),皮膚水泡髮生率低于對照組(P<0.05).結論:無加壓的皮辯護理可取得與傳統加壓包扎相同的療效,且具有操作簡單、患者感覺舒適、便于觀察等優點.
목적:탐토불동피판호리방법대유선암개량근치술후피판회복화환자서괄도적영향.방법:장158례환자수궤분위대조조97례화실험조61례,대조조채용전통가압포찰피변호리,실험조채용불가압피판호리.비교량조술후전3 d인류량、발관천수、피하적액、피판배사、절구유합、피부손상정도급서괄도평분등적차이.결과:량조술후발관천수、피하적액、피판배사급절구1기유합적발생솔비교균무현저성차이(P>0.05).단실험조술후전3 d적인류량명현소우대조조(P<0.01);환자술후24 h급72 h서괄도평분균명현고우대조조(P<0.01);술후술야이외피부홍종발생솔명현저우대조조(P<0.01),피부수포발생솔저우대조조(P<0.05).결론:무가압적피변호리가취득여전통가압포찰상동적료효,차구유조작간단、환자감각서괄、편우관찰등우점.
Objective: To explore the impact of different methods of nursing care of skin flap on flap recovery and the pa-tients'comfort after modified radical mastectomy. Methods: 158 patients were randomly divided into control group (n=97) and experimental group (n=61). The traditional pressurized bandaging was used in control group and non -pressurized bandaging was applied in experimental group, comparing the amount of drainage, the days of extubation, subcutaneous fluid collection, skin flap necrosis, wound healing, degree of skin lesions and the scoring of patient's comfort of the first 3 days after modified radical mastectomy. Results: No significant differences were found in the comparison of the days of extubation, subcutaneous fluid col-lection, skin flap necrosis and phase Ⅰ wound healing between the two groups [P>0.05) ; however, the amount of drainage the first 3 days after operation was less in experimental group than that in control group (P<0.01) ; the scores of the patient's com-fort in 24 hours and 72 hours after operation were significantly higher in experimental group dum that in control group (P < 0.01) ; the incidence of skin irritation outside the surgical field and incidence of skin blisters were significantly lower in experi-mental group than that in control group (P<0.01, P<0.05). Conclusion: The non - pressurized bandaging can achieve the same effect in nursing care of skin flap compared with the traditional pressurized bandage, with the advantages of simple opera-tion, more comfort of patients and easy observation.