中华临床营养杂志
中華臨床營養雜誌
중화림상영양잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
2011年
1期
16-18
,共3页
王璐%孙明晓%汪明芳%严翊%李博文%仲伟娟%张一民%王正珍%谢敏豪
王璐%孫明曉%汪明芳%嚴翊%李博文%仲偉娟%張一民%王正珍%謝敏豪
왕로%손명효%왕명방%엄익%리박문%중위연%장일민%왕정진%사민호
青少年%超重%肥胖%干预
青少年%超重%肥胖%榦預
청소년%초중%비반%간예
Adolescents%Overweight%Obestiy%Intervention
目的 观察不同干预方式对超重、肥胖青少年体重指数(BMI)和体脂含量的影响,以期得到合理有效的青少年减重方案.方法 选择北京市某初中67名超重、肥胖学生为研究对象,采用随机配伍法随机分为对照组(n=16)、膳食干预组(n=22)和综合干预组(膳食+运动,n=29)3组,观察干预前后BMI和体脂率的变化情况.结果 膳食干预组(P=0.000)和综合干预组(P=0.018)试验后的BMI明显低于试验前,膳食干预组BMI的降低幅度明显大于对照组(P=0.035).膳食干预组(P=0.000,P=0.013)和综合干预组(P=0.000,P=0.000)试验后的躯干和全身体脂率均明显低于试验前,综合于预组躯干和全身体脂率的降低幅度明显大于对照组(P=0.005,P=0.003).结论 膳食和综合干预都可使青少年达到减重效果,综合干预效果更佳.
目的 觀察不同榦預方式對超重、肥胖青少年體重指數(BMI)和體脂含量的影響,以期得到閤理有效的青少年減重方案.方法 選擇北京市某初中67名超重、肥胖學生為研究對象,採用隨機配伍法隨機分為對照組(n=16)、膳食榦預組(n=22)和綜閤榦預組(膳食+運動,n=29)3組,觀察榦預前後BMI和體脂率的變化情況.結果 膳食榦預組(P=0.000)和綜閤榦預組(P=0.018)試驗後的BMI明顯低于試驗前,膳食榦預組BMI的降低幅度明顯大于對照組(P=0.035).膳食榦預組(P=0.000,P=0.013)和綜閤榦預組(P=0.000,P=0.000)試驗後的軀榦和全身體脂率均明顯低于試驗前,綜閤于預組軀榦和全身體脂率的降低幅度明顯大于對照組(P=0.005,P=0.003).結論 膳食和綜閤榦預都可使青少年達到減重效果,綜閤榦預效果更佳.
목적 관찰불동간예방식대초중、비반청소년체중지수(BMI)화체지함량적영향,이기득도합리유효적청소년감중방안.방법 선택북경시모초중67명초중、비반학생위연구대상,채용수궤배오법수궤분위대조조(n=16)、선식간예조(n=22)화종합간예조(선식+운동,n=29)3조,관찰간예전후BMI화체지솔적변화정황.결과 선식간예조(P=0.000)화종합간예조(P=0.018)시험후적BMI명현저우시험전,선식간예조BMI적강저폭도명현대우대조조(P=0.035).선식간예조(P=0.000,P=0.013)화종합간예조(P=0.000,P=0.000)시험후적구간화전신체지솔균명현저우시험전,종합우예조구간화전신체지솔적강저폭도명현대우대조조(P=0.005,P=0.003).결론 선식화종합간예도가사청소년체도감중효과,종합간예효과경가.
Objective To observe the effects of different interventions on the body mass index (BMI) and body fat content in overweight and obese adolescents, with an attempt to design reasonable weight relief program.Methods Totally 67 overweight or obese adolescents from a middle school of Beijing were randomly divided into three groups: control group ( n = 16 ), diet intervention group ( n= 22), and combined interventions group ( n =29). The changes of BMI and body fat rate (BFR) were observed. Results BMI significantly decreased after interventions ( diet intervention group: P = 0. 000; combined interventions group: P = 0. 018 ); the change of BMI in diet intervention group was significantly larger than that in control group ( P = 0. 035 ). The trunk and body BFRs also significantly decreased after interventions (diet intervention group: P=0. 000, P = 0. 013; combined interventions group: P = 0. 000, P = 0. 000 ); the changes of trunk and body BFRs were significantly larger in combined interventions group than those in control group ( P = 0.005, P = 0. 003 ). Conclusion Diet intervention and combined interventions are both effective in achieving weight loss in adolescents, and combined interventions have superior effectiveness.