中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2011年
7期
64-66
,共3页
吴金凤%张玉玺%李雁飞%陈梅英%李秀娟%高春红%郁蓉芳%刘扣英
吳金鳳%張玉璽%李雁飛%陳梅英%李秀娟%高春紅%鬱蓉芳%劉釦英
오금봉%장옥새%리안비%진매영%리수연%고춘홍%욱용방%류구영
氧气湿化瓶%细菌监测%湿化液%消毒方法%效果观察
氧氣濕化瓶%細菌鑑測%濕化液%消毒方法%效果觀察
양기습화병%세균감측%습화액%소독방법%효과관찰
Oxygen moisture bottle%Bacterial monitor%,Humidification fluid%Disinfection method%Therapeutic observation
目的 重复使用的氧气湿化装置与一次性氧气湿化装置进行使用后细菌学分析.方法 随机抽取老年科6个病区用后的可重复使用的氧气湿化装置与一次性氧气湿化瓶,将吸氧患者随机分为3组,A组用冷开水作为氧气湿化液,B组用蒸馏水作为氧气湿化液,C组用AQUAPAK一次性氧气湿化装置.A组和B组在每周一和周四更换湿化瓶前采样,C组在每瓶一次性氧气湿化装置使用结束后采样,按<医院消毒卫生标准>消毒液的采样方法 采样后送检验科检验.结果 A组61个样本中带菌率为81.97%,B组71个样本中带菌率为47.89%,C组52个样本中带菌率为0.3种湿化瓶使用后的污染率比较差异显著.A,B组间进行比较,A组细菌平均严重等级高于B组,A组革兰阴性菌种类的等级及革兰阳性菌的带菌率均高于B组.结论 无论是用冷开水还是蒸馏水作为氧气湿化液,湿化液均有不同程度的污染,在目前各医疗机构尚无统一湿化液选择标准以及消毒规范的背景下,对长期吸氧的患者,建议选择一次性氧气湿化装置,以期减少患者院内感染的发生率.
目的 重複使用的氧氣濕化裝置與一次性氧氣濕化裝置進行使用後細菌學分析.方法 隨機抽取老年科6箇病區用後的可重複使用的氧氣濕化裝置與一次性氧氣濕化瓶,將吸氧患者隨機分為3組,A組用冷開水作為氧氣濕化液,B組用蒸餾水作為氧氣濕化液,C組用AQUAPAK一次性氧氣濕化裝置.A組和B組在每週一和週四更換濕化瓶前採樣,C組在每瓶一次性氧氣濕化裝置使用結束後採樣,按<醫院消毒衛生標準>消毒液的採樣方法 採樣後送檢驗科檢驗.結果 A組61箇樣本中帶菌率為81.97%,B組71箇樣本中帶菌率為47.89%,C組52箇樣本中帶菌率為0.3種濕化瓶使用後的汙染率比較差異顯著.A,B組間進行比較,A組細菌平均嚴重等級高于B組,A組革蘭陰性菌種類的等級及革蘭暘性菌的帶菌率均高于B組.結論 無論是用冷開水還是蒸餾水作為氧氣濕化液,濕化液均有不同程度的汙染,在目前各醫療機構尚無統一濕化液選擇標準以及消毒規範的揹景下,對長期吸氧的患者,建議選擇一次性氧氣濕化裝置,以期減少患者院內感染的髮生率.
목적 중복사용적양기습화장치여일차성양기습화장치진행사용후세균학분석.방법 수궤추취노년과6개병구용후적가중복사용적양기습화장치여일차성양기습화병,장흡양환자수궤분위3조,A조용랭개수작위양기습화액,B조용증류수작위양기습화액,C조용AQUAPAK일차성양기습화장치.A조화B조재매주일화주사경환습화병전채양,C조재매병일차성양기습화장치사용결속후채양,안<의원소독위생표준>소독액적채양방법 채양후송검험과검험.결과 A조61개양본중대균솔위81.97%,B조71개양본중대균솔위47.89%,C조52개양본중대균솔위0.3충습화병사용후적오염솔비교차이현저.A,B조간진행비교,A조세균평균엄중등급고우B조,A조혁란음성균충류적등급급혁란양성균적대균솔균고우B조.결론 무론시용랭개수환시증류수작위양기습화액,습화액균유불동정도적오염,재목전각의료궤구상무통일습화액선택표준이급소독규범적배경하,대장기흡양적환자,건의선택일차성양기습화장치,이기감소환자원내감염적발생솔.
Objective To carry out bacteriological analysis between re-used and disposable oxygen humidification devices. Methods Reused oxygen equipment and disposable oxygen moisture bottles from 6 randomly selected elderly wards were collected, patients who used oxygen will be randomized into 3 groups, group A used cold water as the oxygen humidification liquid, group B used distilled water as humidification liquid, group C used AQUAPAK disposable oxygen humidification devices, sample taking in group A and group B happened on every Monday and Thursday before the replacement of sample moisture bottles, sample was taken in group C after the use of disposable oxygen humidification devices, according to "hospital disinfection health standards" (GB5982-1995)sampling method of disinfection liquid sample was taken and sent to test in the disinfectant laboratory. Results Of 61 samples in group A bacteria cartier rate was 81.97%, bacteria carrier rate of 71 samples in group B was 47.89%, of 52 samples in group C the carrier rate was 0. The comparing of bacterial contamination rate of three kinds of oxygen moisture bottles after using was statistically significant. Take group A, B for comparison, the average severity level of bacteria in group A is higher than group B. In group A, the level of the Gram-negative bacteria as well as Gram-positive bacteria colonization was higher than group B. Conclusions Whether use of cold water or distilled water, oxygen humidification liquids have different degrees of pollution. Currently there is no general criteria and norms in the context of sterilization of oxygen humidification, for patients on long-term oxygen using, to choose disposable oxygen humidification device to reduce the incidence of hospital infections is recommended.