CAJ | 학술논문

产褥热的发现一直被当作是假说一演绎模型的经典案例，后又作为最佳说明推理的中心案例。文章比较了假说一演绎、溯因和最佳说明推理几种模型；并从塞麦尔维斯发现产褥热的过程分析其方法论模型，认为其更适合于溯因模型；最后，从案例中理解科学哲学中的一些基本问题。
산욕열적발현일직피당작시가설일연역모형적경전안례，후우작위최가설명추리적중심안례。문장비교료가설일연역、소인화최가설명추리궤충모형；병종새맥이유사발현산욕열적과정분석기방법론모형，인위기경괄합우소인모형；최후，종안례중리해과학철학중적일사기본문제。
The discovery of the pathogen of puerperal （childbed） fever has long been held as a classic example for the hypothetical-deductive model, later on also as a typical case for the model of inference-to-the-best-explanation. This paper makes comparisons between the model of hypothesis-deduction, that of abduction, and that of inference to the best explanation, respectively. Taking Ignaz Semmelweis＇ discovery of the pathogen of puerperal fever under examination, we concluded that the model of abduction is most applicable in this case. Extending from this point, our discussion goes on to touch a few basic problems in the philosophy of science.