泰山医学院学报
泰山醫學院學報
태산의학원학보
JOURNAL OF TAISHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2002年
3期
270-273
,共4页
陈乃秋%康颂建%曾兆麟%史献君%李亚鲁%刘存
陳迺鞦%康頌建%曾兆麟%史獻君%李亞魯%劉存
진내추%강송건%증조린%사헌군%리아로%류존
电针疗法%庆大霉素%耳中毒%琥珀酸脱氢酶
電針療法%慶大黴素%耳中毒%琥珀痠脫氫酶
전침요법%경대매소%이중독%호박산탈경매
electrmcupuncture therapy%gentamycin%ototoxicity%succinate dehydmgenase
目的观察电针对豚鼠庆大霉素(gentamicin,GE)耳中毒引起的耳蜗琥珀酸脱氢酶(succinate de-hydrogenase,SDH)变化的影响.方法将动物随机分成3组:GE组动物肌肉注射GE80 mg@kg-1.d-1,连续注射20天:针刺组肌肉注射GE同GE组,每天电针双侧听宫、翳风、肾俞穴1次,持续刺激15 min;对照组动物不做任何处理.以脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)、SDH组织化学检测为观察指标.结果对照组BAEP和SDH两项指标无明显变化;GE组BAEP反应阈明显升高,SDH显色变淡或消失,毛细胞受损显著;针刺组BAEP反应阈升高幅度和SDH变化及毛细胞损害程度均明显低于GE组.结论针刺组能减轻GE耳毒性,对SDH有保护作用.
目的觀察電針對豚鼠慶大黴素(gentamicin,GE)耳中毒引起的耳蝸琥珀痠脫氫酶(succinate de-hydrogenase,SDH)變化的影響.方法將動物隨機分成3組:GE組動物肌肉註射GE80 mg@kg-1.d-1,連續註射20天:針刺組肌肉註射GE同GE組,每天電針雙側聽宮、翳風、腎俞穴1次,持續刺激15 min;對照組動物不做任何處理.以腦榦聽覺誘髮電位(BAEP)、SDH組織化學檢測為觀察指標.結果對照組BAEP和SDH兩項指標無明顯變化;GE組BAEP反應閾明顯升高,SDH顯色變淡或消失,毛細胞受損顯著;針刺組BAEP反應閾升高幅度和SDH變化及毛細胞損害程度均明顯低于GE組.結論針刺組能減輕GE耳毒性,對SDH有保護作用.
목적관찰전침대돈서경대매소(gentamicin,GE)이중독인기적이와호박산탈경매(succinate de-hydrogenase,SDH)변화적영향.방법장동물수궤분성3조:GE조동물기육주사GE80 mg@kg-1.d-1,련속주사20천:침자조기육주사GE동GE조,매천전침쌍측은궁、예풍、신유혈1차,지속자격15 min;대조조동물불주임하처리.이뇌간은각유발전위(BAEP)、SDH조직화학검측위관찰지표.결과대조조BAEP화SDH량항지표무명현변화;GE조BAEP반응역명현승고,SDH현색변담혹소실,모세포수손현저;침자조BAEP반응역승고폭도화SDH변화급모세포손해정도균명현저우GE조.결론침자조능감경GE이독성,대SDH유보호작용.
Objective: To observe the effect of dectroacupuncture (EA) on succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) ofgentamycin (GE) induced ototoxic cochlear hair cells. Methods: Preyer's reflex normal guinea pigs were seldectedand randomized into three groups: GE group, EA group and control group. Brainstem auditory evoked potential(BAEP) and SDH in the cochlear hair cells were taken as indexes. In the animals of GE group GE was alone inject-ed intramuscularly 80 mg kg- 1. d- 1 for successive 20 days, while in the animals of EA group GE and additional EAwere applied once a day for 15 minutes each time on Tinggong (SI 19), Yifeng(SJ17) and Shenshu (LJB23)points.Results: In GE group BAEP reaction threshold rose markedly, while in EA group it rose slightly. The differencewas significant between the two groups ( P< 0.05 ). The change of SDH within cochlear hair cells and the degreeof hair cell lesion in the EA group were lower than those in GE group. Conclusions: EA therapy could relieve GEototoxicity, maintain SDH in cochlear hair cells, which might be a possible mechanism of action of EA.