国际内分泌代谢杂志
國際內分泌代謝雜誌
국제내분비대사잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
2012年
1期
12-14,20
,共4页
王锐%陆强%冯继%尹福在%刘波%马春明%秦春梅
王銳%陸彊%馮繼%尹福在%劉波%馬春明%秦春梅
왕예%륙강%풍계%윤복재%류파%마춘명%진춘매
腹型肥胖%体脂分布%尿酸%男性
腹型肥胖%體脂分佈%尿痠%男性
복형비반%체지분포%뇨산%남성
Abdominal obesity%Body fat distribution%Uric acid%Male
目的 探讨腹型肥胖男性双能X线(DEXA)测量的体脂分布与血尿酸的关系,并与人体测量学指标进行比较.方法 选取20 ～ 50岁男性为研究对象,其中腰围≥90 cm 88例为腹型肥胖组,腰围＜ 90 cm 60例为对照组.以血尿酸为因变量,分别以人体测量学指标(模型1)和DEXA测量指标(模型2)为自变量构建多元线性回归方程.结果 腹型肥胖组血尿酸水平高于对照组[(389.3±78.8) μmol/L vs.(324.9±61.5) μmol/L,P＜0.01].尿酸与人体测量学指标(r=0.390 ～0.496,P＜0.01)和DEXA测量的各指标(r=0.377 ～0.459,P＜0.01)均呈正相关.模型1中,人体测量学指标腰臀比可解释24.6％血尿酸的变异;模型2中,DEXA测量的躯干脂肪质量可解释21.0％血尿酸的变异.结论成年男性体脂分布与血尿酸水平密切相关.应用人体测量学指标和DEXA两种方法评价体脂分布均与血尿酸密切相关,但DEXA测量指标并不优干人体测量学指标.
目的 探討腹型肥胖男性雙能X線(DEXA)測量的體脂分佈與血尿痠的關繫,併與人體測量學指標進行比較.方法 選取20 ～ 50歲男性為研究對象,其中腰圍≥90 cm 88例為腹型肥胖組,腰圍＜ 90 cm 60例為對照組.以血尿痠為因變量,分彆以人體測量學指標(模型1)和DEXA測量指標(模型2)為自變量構建多元線性迴歸方程.結果 腹型肥胖組血尿痠水平高于對照組[(389.3±78.8) μmol/L vs.(324.9±61.5) μmol/L,P＜0.01].尿痠與人體測量學指標(r=0.390 ～0.496,P＜0.01)和DEXA測量的各指標(r=0.377 ～0.459,P＜0.01)均呈正相關.模型1中,人體測量學指標腰臀比可解釋24.6％血尿痠的變異;模型2中,DEXA測量的軀榦脂肪質量可解釋21.0％血尿痠的變異.結論成年男性體脂分佈與血尿痠水平密切相關.應用人體測量學指標和DEXA兩種方法評價體脂分佈均與血尿痠密切相關,但DEXA測量指標併不優榦人體測量學指標.
목적 탐토복형비반남성쌍능X선(DEXA)측량적체지분포여혈뇨산적관계,병여인체측량학지표진행비교.방법 선취20 ～ 50세남성위연구대상,기중요위≥90 cm 88례위복형비반조,요위＜ 90 cm 60례위대조조.이혈뇨산위인변량,분별이인체측량학지표(모형1)화DEXA측량지표(모형2)위자변량구건다원선성회귀방정.결과 복형비반조혈뇨산수평고우대조조[(389.3±78.8) μmol/L vs.(324.9±61.5) μmol/L,P＜0.01].뇨산여인체측량학지표(r=0.390 ～0.496,P＜0.01)화DEXA측량적각지표(r=0.377 ～0.459,P＜0.01)균정정상관.모형1중,인체측량학지표요둔비가해석24.6％혈뇨산적변이;모형2중,DEXA측량적구간지방질량가해석21.0％혈뇨산적변이.결론성년남성체지분포여혈뇨산수평밀절상관.응용인체측량학지표화DEXA량충방법평개체지분포균여혈뇨산밀절상관,단DEXA측량지표병불우간인체측량학지표.
Objective To investigate the correlation of body fat distribution measured by dual-ener gy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and uric acid among males with abdominally obese,and then compare it with anthropometric obesity indices.Methods This study included 88 males with abdominally obese (waist circumference ≥90 cm,abdominally obese group) and 60 non-abdominally obese men (waist circumference ＜90 cm,control group) aged between 20 and 50 years.In the multiple linear regression model,body fat distribution was the dependent variable,anthropometric obesity indices ( model 1 ) and DEXA-derived parameters (model 2 ) were independent variables.Results The uric acid level of the abdominally obese group [ (389.3 ± 78.8 ) μmol/L vs.( 324.9 ± 61.5 ) μmol/L ] were significantly higher than that of the control group (P ＜ 0.01 ).Uric acid was positively correlated with anthropometric obesity indices (r =0.390 ～ 0.496,P ＜ 0.01 ) and the indices from DEXA ( r =0.377 ～ 0.459,P ＜ 0.01 ).In model 1,24.6％ of the total variance of uric acid was due to waist to hip ratio.In model 2,trunk fat mass explained 21.0％ of the total variance of uric acid.Conclusions Body fat distribution was closely correlated with the uric acid level in adult men.Both measurements for body fat distribution,DEXA and anthropometric obesity indices,were correlated with uric acid levels,however,the former was not superior to the latter.
