中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2011年
11期
1478-1479
,共2页
心脏停搏%心肺复苏术%通气机,机械
心髒停搏%心肺複囌術%通氣機,機械
심장정박%심폐복소술%통기궤,궤계
Heart arrest%Cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Ventilaors mechanical
目的 探讨心肺复苏(CPR)开始时机对患者预后的影响.方法 回顾性分析420例进行CPR急救患者的临床资料,按照开始CPR时机不同分为早期插管组(A组,210例)、及时插管组(B组,115例)和延时插管组(C组,95例),统计分析三组间CPR成功率及平均住院时间.结果 经治疗后,CPR成功:A组43例(20.48%),B组17例(14.78%),C组6例(6.32%),C组CPR成功率明显低于A组和B组(x2=9.74、4.32,均P＜0.05),B组CPR成功率明显低于A组(x2=6.43,P＜0.05);A组、B组、C组平均住院时间分别为(20.13±2.31)d、(22.73±1.82)d、(29.78±2.32)d,三组问差异有统计学意义(F=3.54,P＜0.05.).结论 及时气管插管和机械通气对心肺复苏成功率有很大的提高.
目的 探討心肺複囌(CPR)開始時機對患者預後的影響.方法 迴顧性分析420例進行CPR急救患者的臨床資料,按照開始CPR時機不同分為早期插管組(A組,210例)、及時插管組(B組,115例)和延時插管組(C組,95例),統計分析三組間CPR成功率及平均住院時間.結果 經治療後,CPR成功:A組43例(20.48%),B組17例(14.78%),C組6例(6.32%),C組CPR成功率明顯低于A組和B組(x2=9.74、4.32,均P＜0.05),B組CPR成功率明顯低于A組(x2=6.43,P＜0.05);A組、B組、C組平均住院時間分彆為(20.13±2.31)d、(22.73±1.82)d、(29.78±2.32)d,三組問差異有統計學意義(F=3.54,P＜0.05.).結論 及時氣管插管和機械通氣對心肺複囌成功率有很大的提高.
목적 탐토심폐복소(CPR)개시시궤대환자예후적영향.방법 회고성분석420례진행CPR급구환자적림상자료,안조개시CPR시궤불동분위조기삽관조(A조,210례)、급시삽관조(B조,115례)화연시삽관조(C조,95례),통계분석삼조간CPR성공솔급평균주원시간.결과 경치료후,CPR성공:A조43례(20.48%),B조17례(14.78%),C조6례(6.32%),C조CPR성공솔명현저우A조화B조(x2=9.74、4.32,균P＜0.05),B조CPR성공솔명현저우A조(x2=6.43,P＜0.05);A조、B조、C조평균주원시간분별위(20.13±2.31)d、(22.73±1.82)d、(29.78±2.32)d,삼조문차이유통계학의의(F=3.54,P＜0.05.).결론 급시기관삽관화궤계통기대심폐복소성공솔유흔대적제고.
Objective To explore the influence of the time of tracheal intubation and mechanieM ventilation to the discharge rate of the patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)success.Methods Retrospectivly analyzed the clinical data of 420 patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)successfully.According to the tracheal intubation ventilation,the patients were divided into three groups of early intubation group(group A,210 patients),timely intubation group(group B,115 patients)and delay intubation group(group C,95 patients).Calculate the discharge rate of each group,mad make comparison between the groups.Results After treatment,the success of CPR were 43 cases discharged in group A,the discharge rate was 20.48%;In group B,there were 17 cases discharged,discharge rate was 14.78%,group C only 6 cases ofhospital discharge,the rate was 6.32%.Group C CPR success rate obviously lower than A group and group B(x2=9.74,4.32,P＜0.05),group B CPR success rate obviously lower than group A(x2=6.43,P＜0.05).The hospital time of Group A,group B,and group C average were(20.13±2.31)d、(22.73±1.82)d、(29.78±2.32)d respectively,the difference between three groups was statistically significant(F=3.54,P＜0.05).Conclusion Timely tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation of successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)could significantly improve the patients'discharge rate.
