中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2009年
29期
4-7
,共4页
健康教育%学习需求%量表%信度%效度
健康教育%學習需求%量錶%信度%效度
건강교육%학습수구%량표%신도%효도
Health education%Learning needs%Scale%Reliability%Validity
目的 译制患者学习需求量表(patient learning needs scale,PLNS)并检验其可行性及信效度.方法 译制并形成中文版PLNS量表,由专家组对其内容效度进行评定;采用中文版PLNS量表对385例内外科住院患者进行调查,对量表的可行性、内部一致性、分半信度、结构效度进行评定.结果 问卷回收率98.5%,完成率97.7%,完成问卷时间为(13.75±4.36)min;总量表Cronbach'α系数为0.95,5个分量表的Cronbac'α系数为0.7~0.86;总量表分半信度为0.935,5个分量表的分半信度为0.802~0.876;内容效度指数(CVI)为0.86;经主成分及因子分析,得到负荷较大的9个因子,累计贡献率达64.55%.各因子所在维度基本原量表设想相符.结论 中文版患者学习需求量表有较好的可行性,较高的信度和效度,可用于内外科出院患者健康教育学习需求的评估.
目的 譯製患者學習需求量錶(patient learning needs scale,PLNS)併檢驗其可行性及信效度.方法 譯製併形成中文版PLNS量錶,由專傢組對其內容效度進行評定;採用中文版PLNS量錶對385例內外科住院患者進行調查,對量錶的可行性、內部一緻性、分半信度、結構效度進行評定.結果 問捲迴收率98.5%,完成率97.7%,完成問捲時間為(13.75±4.36)min;總量錶Cronbach'α繫數為0.95,5箇分量錶的Cronbac'α繫數為0.7~0.86;總量錶分半信度為0.935,5箇分量錶的分半信度為0.802~0.876;內容效度指數(CVI)為0.86;經主成分及因子分析,得到負荷較大的9箇因子,纍計貢獻率達64.55%.各因子所在維度基本原量錶設想相符.結論 中文版患者學習需求量錶有較好的可行性,較高的信度和效度,可用于內外科齣院患者健康教育學習需求的評估.
목적 역제환자학습수구량표(patient learning needs scale,PLNS)병검험기가행성급신효도.방법 역제병형성중문판PLNS량표,유전가조대기내용효도진행평정;채용중문판PLNS량표대385례내외과주원환자진행조사,대량표적가행성、내부일치성、분반신도、결구효도진행평정.결과 문권회수솔98.5%,완성솔97.7%,완성문권시간위(13.75±4.36)min;총량표Cronbach'α계수위0.95,5개분량표적Cronbac'α계수위0.7~0.86;총량표분반신도위0.935,5개분량표적분반신도위0.802~0.876;내용효도지수(CVI)위0.86;경주성분급인자분석,득도부하교대적9개인자,루계공헌솔체64.55%.각인자소재유도기본원량표설상상부.결론 중문판환자학습수구량표유교호적가행성,교고적신도화효도,가용우내외과출원환자건강교육학습수구적평고.
Objective To develop the Chinese version of Patient Learning Needs Scale(PLNS), and evaluate the feasibility, validity and reliability of the developed scale. Methods The standard procedure of cross-culture adaptation was used to develop the Chinese version PLNS. A total of 385 adults hospitalized with a medical or surgical illness completed the Chinese version PLNS. The feasibil-ity and psychometric properties of the scale such as, internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity and construct validity were evaluated. Results Questionnaire recovery rate of the investiga-tion was 98.5%,the completion rate was 97.7%. Average time of completing was (13.75±4.36) min. The overall Cronbaeh's α coefficient was 0.95 and the value of a in 5 subscales of PLNS ranged from 0.75 to 0.86. The overall split-half reliability coefficient was 0.95 and the value of split-half in 5 subscales of PLNS ranged from 0.802 to 0.876. The CVI for content validity was 0.86. The construct validity was con-finned by factor analysis with 55,08% variance was explained by 9 factors. Conclusions An accept-able psychometric property of the Chinese version of PLNS was indicated. PLNS could be used as positive aspects measurement of general patients'perceptions of learning needs while discharging.It might be help-ful for care and further clinical study.