菌物学报
菌物學報
균물학보
MYCOSYSTEMA
2006年
4期
546-558
,共13页
分子系统学%18S rDNA序列分析%单源性
分子繫統學%18S rDNA序列分析%單源性
분자계통학%18S rDNA서렬분석%단원성
Molecular systematics%18S rDNA sequence analysis%monophyly
本文以核糖体小亚基(SSU rDNA)为分子标记,对28个属60个种的71个序列片段进行序列分析,探讨火丝菌科的属间亲缘关系.研究结果支持广义的火丝菌科概念,表明该科是单起源的,显示5个主要分支.腐生或与植物共生形成菌根、囊盘被表面具有毛状物的15个属构成A分支,该分支中仅部分属之间的关系比较明确;与苔藓植物生长在一起的4个属构成B分支;C分支包括Otidea和Otideopsis两属,后者与Otidea的成员混杂在一起;D分支仅包括Acervus的成员;E分支由Geopyxis,Tarzetta,Paurocotylis等 5个属组成.分子系统学的研究结果与形态学分类系统之间存在一定差异,依据形态特征和超微结构建立的亚科和族均未获得支持.
本文以覈糖體小亞基(SSU rDNA)為分子標記,對28箇屬60箇種的71箇序列片段進行序列分析,探討火絲菌科的屬間親緣關繫.研究結果支持廣義的火絲菌科概唸,錶明該科是單起源的,顯示5箇主要分支.腐生或與植物共生形成菌根、囊盤被錶麵具有毛狀物的15箇屬構成A分支,該分支中僅部分屬之間的關繫比較明確;與苔蘚植物生長在一起的4箇屬構成B分支;C分支包括Otidea和Otideopsis兩屬,後者與Otidea的成員混雜在一起;D分支僅包括Acervus的成員;E分支由Geopyxis,Tarzetta,Paurocotylis等 5箇屬組成.分子繫統學的研究結果與形態學分類繫統之間存在一定差異,依據形態特徵和超微結構建立的亞科和族均未穫得支持.
본문이핵당체소아기(SSU rDNA)위분자표기,대28개속60개충적71개서렬편단진행서렬분석,탐토화사균과적속간친연관계.연구결과지지엄의적화사균과개념,표명해과시단기원적,현시5개주요분지.부생혹여식물공생형성균근、낭반피표면구유모상물적15개속구성A분지,해분지중부부분속지간적관계비교명학;여태선식물생장재일기적4개속구성B분지;C분지포괄Otidea화Otideopsis량속,후자여Otidea적성원혼잡재일기;D분지부포괄Acervus적성원;E분지유Geopyxis,Tarzetta,Paurocotylis등 5개속조성.분자계통학적연구결과여형태학분류계통지간존재일정차이,의거형태특정화초미결구건립적아과화족균미획득지지.
Phylogenetic relationships among some members of the Pyronemataceae were studied based on 71 SSU rDNA sequences from 60 species of 28 genera in the Pyronemataceae and 13 species in several families of the Pezizales. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses suggest that Pyronemataceae in a broad sense seems monophyletic. Subfamilies and tribes suggested previously by different authors are not supported by our molecular data. Five distinct lineages are recognized within the family. Fifteen terrestrial, saprophytic and hairy genera constitute Lineage A, for which only the relationships of some taxa involved are clear. The four moss-associated genera are closely related and form Lineage B. Lineage C contains only Otidea and Otideopsis and shows that Otideopsis is nested among taxa of Otidea. Lineage D contains only the morphologically distinct genus Acervus. Lineage E includes the remaining genera with diverse gross morphology, in which many problems still need to be solved. Comments on some morphological features used in taxonomy of the family are provided.