中华围产医学杂志
中華圍產醫學雜誌
중화위산의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
2011年
5期
277-282
,共6页
石青青%孙海翔%朱海燕%朱湘玉%盛敏%胡娅莉
石青青%孫海翔%硃海燕%硃湘玉%盛敏%鬍婭莉
석청청%손해상%주해연%주상옥%성민%호아리
分裂球%核酸杂交%核酸扩增技术%核酸探针%聚合酶链反应%植入前诊断
分裂毬%覈痠雜交%覈痠擴增技術%覈痠探針%聚閤酶鏈反應%植入前診斷
분렬구%핵산잡교%핵산확증기술%핵산탐침%취합매련반응%식입전진단
Blastomeres%Nucleic acid hybridization%Nucleic acid amplification techniques%Nucleic acid probes%Polymerase chain reaction%Preimplantation diagnosis
目的 探讨不同扩增方法和探针长度对植入前单个卵裂球比较基因组杂交(comparative genomic hybridization,CGH)检测结果的影响,为植入前产前诊断奠定基础.方法 随机将20枚植入前6~8细胞期胚胎卵裂球分为A和B组(各10枚),取1名正常男性外周血20枚淋巴细胞,分为C和D组(各10枚)作为对照.A和C组经简并寡聚核苷酸聚合酶链反应(degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction,DOP-PCR)、B和D组经多重置换扩增(multiple displacement amplification,MDA)分别进行全基因组扩增(whole genome amplification,WGA),用上述全基因组扩增产物进行PCR扩增TBX1基因2号外显子,验证其特异性.将获得的WGA产物制备成250~750 bp和750~2000 bp 2种不同长度的探针与正常男性中期染色体核型进行杂交,Y染色体性别决定区(sex-determining region of Y,SRY)基因验证CGH检测结果.结果 (1)用DOP-PCR扩增时,A组10枚卵裂球中有9枚WGA成功,C组10枚淋巴细胞WGA均成功;但其扩增产物进一步扩增TBX1基因2号外显子时,出现较多非特异性条带.CGH检测中.5例卵裂球用长度250~750 bp的探针检测时,1例失败,1例CGH软件核型分析结果与SRY结果不一致.(2)经MDA的B和D组,均WGA成功;其产物进一步扩增TBX1基因2号外显子时,非特异性条带少.CGH检测中,探针长度为250~750 bp的5例卵裂球均检测成功,且与SRY验证结果一致.(3)用长度为750~2000 bp探针检测时,杂交效果不好.结论 单卵裂球全基因组扩增,MDA较DOP-PCR方法稳定,特异性强,CGH检测中,扩增产物酶切至250~750 bp制备的探针杂交图像均匀、清晰,软件分析核型结果稳定、准确.
目的 探討不同擴增方法和探針長度對植入前單箇卵裂毬比較基因組雜交(comparative genomic hybridization,CGH)檢測結果的影響,為植入前產前診斷奠定基礎.方法 隨機將20枚植入前6~8細胞期胚胎卵裂毬分為A和B組(各10枚),取1名正常男性外週血20枚淋巴細胞,分為C和D組(各10枚)作為對照.A和C組經簡併寡聚覈苷痠聚閤酶鏈反應(degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction,DOP-PCR)、B和D組經多重置換擴增(multiple displacement amplification,MDA)分彆進行全基因組擴增(whole genome amplification,WGA),用上述全基因組擴增產物進行PCR擴增TBX1基因2號外顯子,驗證其特異性.將穫得的WGA產物製備成250~750 bp和750~2000 bp 2種不同長度的探針與正常男性中期染色體覈型進行雜交,Y染色體性彆決定區(sex-determining region of Y,SRY)基因驗證CGH檢測結果.結果 (1)用DOP-PCR擴增時,A組10枚卵裂毬中有9枚WGA成功,C組10枚淋巴細胞WGA均成功;但其擴增產物進一步擴增TBX1基因2號外顯子時,齣現較多非特異性條帶.CGH檢測中.5例卵裂毬用長度250~750 bp的探針檢測時,1例失敗,1例CGH軟件覈型分析結果與SRY結果不一緻.(2)經MDA的B和D組,均WGA成功;其產物進一步擴增TBX1基因2號外顯子時,非特異性條帶少.CGH檢測中,探針長度為250~750 bp的5例卵裂毬均檢測成功,且與SRY驗證結果一緻.(3)用長度為750~2000 bp探針檢測時,雜交效果不好.結論 單卵裂毬全基因組擴增,MDA較DOP-PCR方法穩定,特異性彊,CGH檢測中,擴增產物酶切至250~750 bp製備的探針雜交圖像均勻、清晰,軟件分析覈型結果穩定、準確.
목적 탐토불동확증방법화탐침장도대식입전단개란렬구비교기인조잡교(comparative genomic hybridization,CGH)검측결과적영향,위식입전산전진단전정기출.방법 수궤장20매식입전6~8세포기배태란렬구분위A화B조(각10매),취1명정상남성외주혈20매림파세포,분위C화D조(각10매)작위대조.A화C조경간병과취핵감산취합매련반응(degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction,DOP-PCR)、B화D조경다중치환확증(multiple displacement amplification,MDA)분별진행전기인조확증(whole genome amplification,WGA),용상술전기인조확증산물진행PCR확증TBX1기인2호외현자,험증기특이성.장획득적WGA산물제비성250~750 bp화750~2000 bp 2충불동장도적탐침여정상남성중기염색체핵형진행잡교,Y염색체성별결정구(sex-determining region of Y,SRY)기인험증CGH검측결과.결과 (1)용DOP-PCR확증시,A조10매란렬구중유9매WGA성공,C조10매림파세포WGA균성공;단기확증산물진일보확증TBX1기인2호외현자시,출현교다비특이성조대.CGH검측중.5례란렬구용장도250~750 bp적탐침검측시,1례실패,1례CGH연건핵형분석결과여SRY결과불일치.(2)경MDA적B화D조,균WGA성공;기산물진일보확증TBX1기인2호외현자시,비특이성조대소.CGH검측중,탐침장도위250~750 bp적5례란렬구균검측성공,차여SRY험증결과일치.(3)용장도위750~2000 bp탐침검측시,잡교효과불호.결론 단란렬구전기인조확증,MDA교DOP-PCR방법은정,특이성강,CGH검측중,확증산물매절지250~750 bp제비적탐침잡교도상균균、청석,연건분석핵형결과은정、준학.
Objective To investigate the effect of different amplification methods and probes with various length on the results of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of pre-implanted single blastomere and to establish the basis for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.Methods Twenty blastomeres of embryo at 6-8 cells stage were randomly divided into A and B group with 10 in each.Twenty peripheral blood lymphocytes from a healthy man were similarly divided into C and D group with 10 in each.Degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) was used to amplify whole genomic DNA in group A and C,and multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was used in group B and D for whole genome amplification (WGA).The specificity of resultant products was confirmed by amplification of TBX1 gene exon 2.CGH was performed respectively with 250-750 bp and 750-2000 bp probes prepared from the amplified whole genomic DNA.The result of CGH was verified by sex-determining region of Y (SRY).Results (1) Nine of the 10 samples in group A and all in group C were amplifiable by DOP-PCR,but there were multiple non-specific bands in the amplification of TBX1 exon 2 when WGA products were used as templates.When 250~750 bp probe was used in CGH,1 of the 5 blastomeres was failed and another one had different karyotype from that analyzed by SRY.(2) All samples in group B and D were successfully amplified by MDA,and the non-specific bands were significantly less in the amplification of TBX1 exon 2.All 5 blastomeres were successful in CGH with the 250~750 bp probe.Moreover,the karyotype was in agreement with that of SRY.(3) When 750 ~ 2000 bp probe was used,the CGH results were suboptimal.Conclusions In WGA of single blastomere,MDA is superior to DOP-PCR in the stability and specificity.The karyotype image detected by CGH with the 250~750 bp probe is clear and homogenous.