中华心血管病杂志
中華心血管病雜誌
중화심혈관병잡지
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
2009年
7期
615-617
,共3页
蒋锦琪%陈良%林启蓉%汪坚敏%罗明%魏盟
蔣錦琪%陳良%林啟蓉%汪堅敏%囉明%魏盟
장금기%진량%림계용%왕견민%라명%위맹
微血管性心绞痛%体层摄影术,发射型计算机,单光子
微血管性心絞痛%體層攝影術,髮射型計算機,單光子
미혈관성심교통%체층섭영술,발사형계산궤,단광자
Microvascular angina%Tomography emission-computed,single-photon
目的 探讨双嘧达莫负荷心肌201T1单光子发射计算机断层摄影(SPECT)与运动负荷心肌99Tcm-甲氧基异丁基异腈(MIBI)SPECT显像在辅助诊断心脏x综合征中的价值.方法 选取临床符合心脏X综合征诊断标准患者共63例,将患者分为2组,一组行双嘧达莫负荷心肌201T1 SPECT显像,另一组行运动负荷心肌99Tcm-MIBI SPECT显像,评价两种核素心肌显像在诊断心脏X综合征中的符合率.结果 行双嘧达莫负荷心肌201T1 SPECT显像者35例,有31例出现病变部位的反向再分布,符合率为89%;行运动负荷心肌99Tcm-MIBI SPECT显像者28例,其中有24例出现负荷病变部位放射性稀疏或缺损,静息显像正常,符合率为87%.两种核素心肌灌注显像的符合率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 双嘧达莫负荷心肌201T1 SPECT显像能较直接反映心脏x综合征冠状动脉微循环病变.
目的 探討雙嘧達莫負荷心肌201T1單光子髮射計算機斷層攝影(SPECT)與運動負荷心肌99Tcm-甲氧基異丁基異腈(MIBI)SPECT顯像在輔助診斷心髒x綜閤徵中的價值.方法 選取臨床符閤心髒X綜閤徵診斷標準患者共63例,將患者分為2組,一組行雙嘧達莫負荷心肌201T1 SPECT顯像,另一組行運動負荷心肌99Tcm-MIBI SPECT顯像,評價兩種覈素心肌顯像在診斷心髒X綜閤徵中的符閤率.結果 行雙嘧達莫負荷心肌201T1 SPECT顯像者35例,有31例齣現病變部位的反嚮再分佈,符閤率為89%;行運動負荷心肌99Tcm-MIBI SPECT顯像者28例,其中有24例齣現負荷病變部位放射性稀疏或缺損,靜息顯像正常,符閤率為87%.兩種覈素心肌灌註顯像的符閤率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 雙嘧達莫負荷心肌201T1 SPECT顯像能較直接反映心髒x綜閤徵冠狀動脈微循環病變.
목적 탐토쌍밀체막부하심기201T1단광자발사계산궤단층섭영(SPECT)여운동부하심기99Tcm-갑양기이정기이정(MIBI)SPECT현상재보조진단심장x종합정중적개치.방법 선취림상부합심장X종합정진단표준환자공63례,장환자분위2조,일조행쌍밀체막부하심기201T1 SPECT현상,령일조행운동부하심기99Tcm-MIBI SPECT현상,평개량충핵소심기현상재진단심장X종합정중적부합솔.결과 행쌍밀체막부하심기201T1 SPECT현상자35례,유31례출현병변부위적반향재분포,부합솔위89%;행운동부하심기99Tcm-MIBI SPECT현상자28례,기중유24례출현부하병변부위방사성희소혹결손,정식현상정상,부합솔위87%.량충핵소심기관주현상적부합솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 쌍밀체막부하심기201T1 SPECT현상능교직접반영심장x종합정관상동맥미순배병변.
Objective To compare the value of dipyridamole 201T1 Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial imaging and exercise myocardial 99Tcm-MIBI SPECT imaging on diagnosing cardiac syndrome X.Methods Sixty-three patients with known cardiac syndrome X were divided into dipyridamole 201T1 SPECT myocardial imaging group (group 1,n = 35) and exercise myocardial 99Tcm-MIBI-SPECT imaging group (group 2,n = 28) and the diagnostic accuracy rates were compared.Results Thirty-one out of 35 cardiac syndrome X patients showed reverse redistribution in group 1 and the diagnostic accuracy rate was 89%.Positive test results were evidenced 24 out of 28 cardiac syndrome X patients in group 2 and the diagnostic accuracy rate was 87% (P > 0.05 vs.group 1).Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy rates of these two myocardial imaging methods were satisfactory and comparable on detecting cardiac syndrome X.