中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2010年
6期
452-455
,共4页
曹秀峰%吕进%朱斌%安红银%王山%吴必超%纪律%陶磊%王冬冬
曹秀峰%呂進%硃斌%安紅銀%王山%吳必超%紀律%陶磊%王鼕鼕
조수봉%려진%주빈%안홍은%왕산%오필초%기률%도뢰%왕동동
食管肿瘤%外科手术%药物疗法%放射疗法
食管腫瘤%外科手術%藥物療法%放射療法
식관종류%외과수술%약물요법%방사요법
Esophageal neoplasms%Surgical procedures%Drug therapy%Radiotherapy
目的 评价局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(FSCC)手术后放射治疗和化疗的疗效.方法 将1997年1月至2004年6月间入院的158例ESCC(Ⅱ-Ⅲ期)患者随机分为术后放化疗组(78例)和单纯手术组(80例).后经微调和排查,实际术后放化疗组为74例,单纯手术组为77例.对比两组患者的并发症发生率、局部复发率和远处转移率、生存率及无进展生存率.结果 患者平均随访45个月,术后放化疗组的并发症发生率与单纯手术组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后放化疗组局部复发和远处转移率低于单纯手术组(P<0.05).术后放化疗组的中位生存时间(53.5个月)与单纯手术组(37个月)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组的1年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但3、5和10年生存率比较,术后放化疗组优于单纯手术组(P<0.05).术后放化疗组的中位无进展生存期(46个月)与单纯手术组(34个月)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组1年无进展生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但3、5和10年无进展生存率比较,术后放化疗组优于单纯手术组(P<0.05).结论 术后合理应用放化疗可有效提高局部晚期ESCC患者的无进展生存时间及长期生存率.
目的 評價跼部晚期食管鱗狀細胞癌(FSCC)手術後放射治療和化療的療效.方法 將1997年1月至2004年6月間入院的158例ESCC(Ⅱ-Ⅲ期)患者隨機分為術後放化療組(78例)和單純手術組(80例).後經微調和排查,實際術後放化療組為74例,單純手術組為77例.對比兩組患者的併髮癥髮生率、跼部複髮率和遠處轉移率、生存率及無進展生存率.結果 患者平均隨訪45箇月,術後放化療組的併髮癥髮生率與單純手術組比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).術後放化療組跼部複髮和遠處轉移率低于單純手術組(P<0.05).術後放化療組的中位生存時間(53.5箇月)與單純手術組(37箇月)比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),兩組的1年生存率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但3、5和10年生存率比較,術後放化療組優于單純手術組(P<0.05).術後放化療組的中位無進展生存期(46箇月)與單純手術組(34箇月)比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),兩組1年無進展生存率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但3、5和10年無進展生存率比較,術後放化療組優于單純手術組(P<0.05).結論 術後閤理應用放化療可有效提高跼部晚期ESCC患者的無進展生存時間及長期生存率.
목적 평개국부만기식관린상세포암(FSCC)수술후방사치료화화료적료효.방법 장1997년1월지2004년6월간입원적158례ESCC(Ⅱ-Ⅲ기)환자수궤분위술후방화료조(78례)화단순수술조(80례).후경미조화배사,실제술후방화료조위74례,단순수술조위77례.대비량조환자적병발증발생솔、국부복발솔화원처전이솔、생존솔급무진전생존솔.결과 환자평균수방45개월,술후방화료조적병발증발생솔여단순수술조비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).술후방화료조국부복발화원처전이솔저우단순수술조(P<0.05).술후방화료조적중위생존시간(53.5개월)여단순수술조(37개월)비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),량조적1년생존솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단3、5화10년생존솔비교,술후방화료조우우단순수술조(P<0.05).술후방화료조적중위무진전생존기(46개월)여단순수술조(34개월)비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),량조1년무진전생존솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단3、5화10년무진전생존솔비교,술후방화료조우우단순수술조(P<0.05).결론 술후합리응용방화료가유효제고국부만기ESCC환자적무진전생존시간급장기생존솔.
Objective To investigate the role of postoperative chemoradiotherapy ( CRT) as a multimodality treatment option for locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by a prospective comparison between surgery alone and postoperative CRT. Methods Using preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based staging criteria, 158 patients with ESCC (stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ) were enrolled in this prospective study. With informed consent, the patients were randomized into two groups: postoperative CRT (78 cases ) and surgery alone (S, 80 cases). After a few minor adjustments to the enrolled patients, the actual patients of postoperative CRT group and S group were 74 cases and 77 cases, respectively. Comparison of the complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, survival rate and progression-free survival in the two groups was carried out. Results With a median follow-up of 37.5 months, the 1-,3-,5-, 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 91.0% , 62.8%,42.3%,24.4% and 87.5% , 51.3% , 33.8% , 12. 5% for the postoperative CRT and S arm, respectively. A significant difference in OS was detected between the two arms (P =0.0276). There was a significant difference of progression-free survival (PFS) between the two arms (P=0.0136). The local recurrence rates in the postoperative CRT group and S group were 14.9% and 36.4% , respectively (P<0.05). No significant difference was detected between the complications of the two groups ( P > 0. 05). Toxicities of chemoradiotherapy in the postoperative CRT arm were moderate, which can be relieved rapidly by adequate therapy. Conclusion Rational application of postoperative chemoradiotherapy can provide a benefit in progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.