辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报
遼寧公安司法管理榦部學院學報
료녕공안사법관리간부학원학보
JOURNAL OF LIAONING ADMINISTRATORS COLLEGE OF POLICE AND JUSTICE
2011年
3期
38-43
,共6页
书证%证据书类%为证物之文书%传闻规则
書證%證據書類%為證物之文書%傳聞規則
서증%증거서류%위증물지문서%전문규칙
documentary evidence%category of evidence%the instrument as evidence%the hearsay rule
海峡两岸刑诉法学者一般均认为,刑事诉讼法中的书证（以下简称书证）是以文书（广义）记载的内容作为证据。就此而言,两岸学者对书证内涵的理解是基本一致的。然而在书证的证据效力、外延及书证的形成过程等问题的阐释上,两岸学者几乎完全＂分道扬镳＂。台湾刑诉法学者另从＂证据书类＂的角度来认识书证,实际上认为书证是以＂文书记载的陈述人对案件事实的陈述＂这一＂内容＂来证明该案件事实真实性的证据。内地学者所理解的书证是案件事实发展过程中所遗留下来的客观存在,并且是凭其＂存在或状态＂来证明案件事实的,理应将之归入物证之列。如果内地学者仍然将其通常所指称的书证,定义为是以其记载的内容来证明案件事实的证据,这种定义方式是值得商榷的。
海峽兩岸刑訴法學者一般均認為,刑事訴訟法中的書證（以下簡稱書證）是以文書（廣義）記載的內容作為證據。就此而言,兩岸學者對書證內涵的理解是基本一緻的。然而在書證的證據效力、外延及書證的形成過程等問題的闡釋上,兩岸學者幾乎完全＂分道颺鑣＂。檯灣刑訴法學者另從＂證據書類＂的角度來認識書證,實際上認為書證是以＂文書記載的陳述人對案件事實的陳述＂這一＂內容＂來證明該案件事實真實性的證據。內地學者所理解的書證是案件事實髮展過程中所遺留下來的客觀存在,併且是憑其＂存在或狀態＂來證明案件事實的,理應將之歸入物證之列。如果內地學者仍然將其通常所指稱的書證,定義為是以其記載的內容來證明案件事實的證據,這種定義方式是值得商榷的。
해협량안형소법학자일반균인위,형사소송법중적서증（이하간칭서증）시이문서（엄의）기재적내용작위증거。취차이언,량안학자대서증내함적리해시기본일치적。연이재서증적증거효력、외연급서증적형성과정등문제적천석상,량안학자궤호완전＂분도양표＂。태만형소법학자령종＂증거서류＂적각도래인식서증,실제상인위서증시이＂문서기재적진술인대안건사실적진술＂저일＂내용＂래증명해안건사실진실성적증거。내지학자소리해적서증시안건사실발전과정중소유류하래적객관존재,병차시빙기＂존재혹상태＂래증명안건사실적,리응장지귀입물증지렬。여과내지학자잉연장기통상소지칭적서증,정의위시이기기재적내용래증명안건사실적증거,저충정의방식시치득상각적。
Cross—strait scholars of the Criminal Procedure Law generally agree that the documentary evidence of Criminal Procedure Law（hereinafter referred to as documentary evidence） is based on recorded content of documents（broadly defined） as evidence.In this regard,the understanding of documentary evidence of scholars of both sides is basically the same.However, the interpretation in the effectiveness,the extension and the formation of documentary evidence and other issues of the two sides is almost entirely different.Taiwan＇s scholar of Criminal Procedure Law from＂category of evidence＂to understand the documentary evidence is that the＂content＂of the＂recorded statements were facts of the case＂to prove the authenticity of the facts of the case.Mainland scholars understand the documentary evidence is the objective existence left behind in the development of the case and is by their＂existence or status＂to prove the facts of the case which should be classified as the material evidence.If Mainland scholars still think the documentary evidence is usually defined as the content in their records of evidence to prove the facts of the case,this definition is debatable.
