中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2011年
11期
27-29
,共3页
刘硕%吴永吉%李凤歧%苗文隆%孙光
劉碩%吳永吉%李鳳歧%苗文隆%孫光
류석%오영길%리봉기%묘문륭%손광
肾肿瘤%ROC曲线%体层摄影术,X线计算机%WHO2004年诊断标准%囊壁及分隔厚度
腎腫瘤%ROC麯線%體層攝影術,X線計算機%WHO2004年診斷標準%囊壁及分隔厚度
신종류%ROC곡선%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%WHO2004년진단표준%낭벽급분격후도
Kidney neoplasms%ROC curve%Tomography,X-ray computed%WHO 2004criteria%Thickness of cystic wall and/or septum
目的 探讨符合WHO 2004年诊断标准的多房囊性肾细胞癌(MCRCC)患者的CT特征及与其他亚型囊性肾细胞癌(CRCC)的鉴别要点.方法 依据是否符合WHO 2004年病理诊断标准将40例患者分为两组:MCRCC组及其他亚型CRCC组(CRCC组),复阅CT片,对比肿瘤直径、边界、密度、囊壁及分隔最大厚度、钙化、强化值等CT征象.采用ROC曲线法确定相关指标的临界值及诊断的特异度、灵敏度.结果 MCRCC组17例,CRCC组23例.MCRCC多表现为囊壁薄、分隔细小、无明显结节的囊性占位.囊壁及分隔最大厚度是鉴别MCRCC及其他亚型CRCC的惟一CT征象(P<0.01),其临界值为6mm,诊断的灵敏度和特异度分别为89%和75%.结论 囊壁及分隔厚度小于6 mm是鉴别MCRCC与其他亚型CRCC的主要CT征象.
目的 探討符閤WHO 2004年診斷標準的多房囊性腎細胞癌(MCRCC)患者的CT特徵及與其他亞型囊性腎細胞癌(CRCC)的鑒彆要點.方法 依據是否符閤WHO 2004年病理診斷標準將40例患者分為兩組:MCRCC組及其他亞型CRCC組(CRCC組),複閱CT片,對比腫瘤直徑、邊界、密度、囊壁及分隔最大厚度、鈣化、彊化值等CT徵象.採用ROC麯線法確定相關指標的臨界值及診斷的特異度、靈敏度.結果 MCRCC組17例,CRCC組23例.MCRCC多錶現為囊壁薄、分隔細小、無明顯結節的囊性佔位.囊壁及分隔最大厚度是鑒彆MCRCC及其他亞型CRCC的惟一CT徵象(P<0.01),其臨界值為6mm,診斷的靈敏度和特異度分彆為89%和75%.結論 囊壁及分隔厚度小于6 mm是鑒彆MCRCC與其他亞型CRCC的主要CT徵象.
목적 탐토부합WHO 2004년진단표준적다방낭성신세포암(MCRCC)환자적CT특정급여기타아형낭성신세포암(CRCC)적감별요점.방법 의거시부부합WHO 2004년병리진단표준장40례환자분위량조:MCRCC조급기타아형CRCC조(CRCC조),복열CT편,대비종류직경、변계、밀도、낭벽급분격최대후도、개화、강화치등CT정상.채용ROC곡선법학정상관지표적림계치급진단적특이도、령민도.결과 MCRCC조17례,CRCC조23례.MCRCC다표현위낭벽박、분격세소、무명현결절적낭성점위.낭벽급분격최대후도시감별MCRCC급기타아형CRCC적유일CT정상(P<0.01),기림계치위6mm,진단적령민도화특이도분별위89%화75%.결론 낭벽급분격후도소우6 mm시감별MCRCC여기타아형CRCC적주요CT정상.
Objective To determine the main CT features and the key points of differential
diagnosis of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (MCRCC) classified according to 2004 WHO
pathological diagnostic criteria. Methods According to the criteria, 40 patients were divided into two
groups: MCRCC group and other subtypes of cystic renal cell carcinoma (CRCC). The CT findings were
evaluated and compared between two groups for cystic content, wall, septum, nodularity, calcification and
enhancement. ROC curve was used to determine the cut-off value of the possible CT feature which could
distinguish MCRCC from other subtypes of CRCC. Results Seventeen cases of MCRCC group and 23 cases
of CRCC group were included in this study according to the diagnostic criteria. MCRCC appeared as a well
defined multilocular cystic mass with thin wall and sepia and no expansile solid nodules. Thickness of cystic
wall and/or septum is was main CT findings to distinguish MCRCC from other subtypes of CRCC (P < 0.01 ).
The cut-off value of the thickness was 6 mm and its sensibility, specificity was 89% ,75% respectively.
Conclusion Cystic wall and/or septum with a thickness of less than 6 mm are the main CT findings to dis
tinguish MCRCC from other subtypes of CRCC.