CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较齐刺与常规针法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床效果.方法将49例椎动脉型颈椎病患者随机分为两组,对照组24例采用常规针法治疗,观察组25例采用齐刺针法治疗,比较两组的临床效果.结果观察组的痊愈率(76%)明显高于对照组(46%),差异有统计学意义(x2=4.69,P＜0.05).观察组的平均血流速度(Vm)改善情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论齐刺针法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床效果优于常规针法.
목적 비교제자여상규침법치료추동맥형경추병적림상효과.방법 장49례추동맥형경추병환자수궤분위량조,대조조24례채용상규침법치료,관찰조25례채용제자침법치료,비교량조적림상효과.결과 관찰조적전유솔(76%)명현고우대조조(46%),차이유통계학의의(x2=4.69,P＜0.05).관찰조적평균혈류속도(Vm)개선정황우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 제자침법치료추동맥형경추병림상효과우우상규침법.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of triple needling and conventional acupuncture in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type. Methods 49 cases with cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type were randomly divided into two groups ,24 patients of control group treated with conventional acupuncture,25 patients of observation group treated with triple needling,the clinical results of two groups were compared. Results The obvious effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than the control group, there were significant differences between two groups( x2 =4. 69 ,P < 0. 05). The improvement of average flow velocity(Vm) of the observation group was better than the control group, there was significant difference between two groups ( P < 0. 05 ).Conclusion Triple needling in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type had better clinical results, and it was worthy of concern.