中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2010年
11期
868-871
,共4页
方强%韩泳涛%任光国%叶长宁%谭泰昌%彭林%肖波%肖文光
方彊%韓泳濤%任光國%葉長寧%譚泰昌%彭林%肖波%肖文光
방강%한영도%임광국%협장저%담태창%팽림%초파%초문광
食管肿瘤%小切口%Ivor-Lewis食管切除术%急性时相蛋白%细胞因子
食管腫瘤%小切口%Ivor-Lewis食管切除術%急性時相蛋白%細胞因子
식관종류%소절구%Ivor-Lewis식관절제술%급성시상단백%세포인자
Esophageal neoplasms%Small incision%Ivor Lewis esophagectomy%Acute phase protein%Cytokine
目的 探讨小切口Ivor-Lewis食管切除术对食管癌患者围手术期急性时相反应的影响.方法 采用非随机临床对照研究的方法,按照患者意愿,将48例胸中下段食管鳞癌患者分为小切口Ivor-Lewis食管切除术组(25例)和传统手术组(23例).于术前1 d、术后第18 h、术后第3天、术后第7天检测两组患者血清中急性时相蛋白[C反应蛋白(CRP)、触珠蛋白(HPT)、α1-酸性糖蛋白(α1-AG)、铜蓝蛋白(CER)、转铁蛋白(TRF)、β2微球蛋白(β2-MG)、白蛋白(ALB)]和细胞因子[白细胞介素6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)]的含量,并进行比较.结果 手术前后各时点,两组患者血清中各急性时相蛋白和IL-6的含量差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).术后第18 h,两组患者血清中CRP和α1-AG的含量均较术前明显增高(均P<0.05),直至术后第7天仍显著高于术前水平(均P<0.05).术后各时点,两组患者血清中ALB和TRF的含量均较术前明显降低(均P<0.05).CER和β2-MG的含量在手术前后均无明显变化(均P>0.05).术后第18 h,小切口组患者血清中TNF-α的含量明显高于传统组(P<0.05);其余各时点,两组差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 与传统手术比较,小切口Ivor-Lewis食管切除术并未明显减轻患者对手术创伤的应激反应.在不改变手术实质的前提下,要达到手术方式本身对机体创伤的微创化,切口大小并不是关键因素,还需要从与手术相关的各个环节中寻找新的有效途径.
目的 探討小切口Ivor-Lewis食管切除術對食管癌患者圍手術期急性時相反應的影響.方法 採用非隨機臨床對照研究的方法,按照患者意願,將48例胸中下段食管鱗癌患者分為小切口Ivor-Lewis食管切除術組(25例)和傳統手術組(23例).于術前1 d、術後第18 h、術後第3天、術後第7天檢測兩組患者血清中急性時相蛋白[C反應蛋白(CRP)、觸珠蛋白(HPT)、α1-痠性糖蛋白(α1-AG)、銅藍蛋白(CER)、轉鐵蛋白(TRF)、β2微毬蛋白(β2-MG)、白蛋白(ALB)]和細胞因子[白細胞介素6(IL-6)、腫瘤壞死因子α(TNF-α)]的含量,併進行比較.結果 手術前後各時點,兩組患者血清中各急性時相蛋白和IL-6的含量差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05).術後第18 h,兩組患者血清中CRP和α1-AG的含量均較術前明顯增高(均P<0.05),直至術後第7天仍顯著高于術前水平(均P<0.05).術後各時點,兩組患者血清中ALB和TRF的含量均較術前明顯降低(均P<0.05).CER和β2-MG的含量在手術前後均無明顯變化(均P>0.05).術後第18 h,小切口組患者血清中TNF-α的含量明顯高于傳統組(P<0.05);其餘各時點,兩組差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05).結論 與傳統手術比較,小切口Ivor-Lewis食管切除術併未明顯減輕患者對手術創傷的應激反應.在不改變手術實質的前提下,要達到手術方式本身對機體創傷的微創化,切口大小併不是關鍵因素,還需要從與手術相關的各箇環節中尋找新的有效途徑.
목적 탐토소절구Ivor-Lewis식관절제술대식관암환자위수술기급성시상반응적영향.방법 채용비수궤림상대조연구적방법,안조환자의원,장48례흉중하단식관린암환자분위소절구Ivor-Lewis식관절제술조(25례)화전통수술조(23례).우술전1 d、술후제18 h、술후제3천、술후제7천검측량조환자혈청중급성시상단백[C반응단백(CRP)、촉주단백(HPT)、α1-산성당단백(α1-AG)、동람단백(CER)、전철단백(TRF)、β2미구단백(β2-MG)、백단백(ALB)]화세포인자[백세포개소6(IL-6)、종류배사인자α(TNF-α)]적함량,병진행비교.결과 수술전후각시점,량조환자혈청중각급성시상단백화IL-6적함량차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05).술후제18 h,량조환자혈청중CRP화α1-AG적함량균교술전명현증고(균P<0.05),직지술후제7천잉현저고우술전수평(균P<0.05).술후각시점,량조환자혈청중ALB화TRF적함량균교술전명현강저(균P<0.05).CER화β2-MG적함량재수술전후균무명현변화(균P>0.05).술후제18 h,소절구조환자혈청중TNF-α적함량명현고우전통조(P<0.05);기여각시점,량조차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05).결론 여전통수술비교,소절구Ivor-Lewis식관절제술병미명현감경환자대수술창상적응격반응.재불개변수술실질적전제하,요체도수술방식본신대궤체창상적미창화,절구대소병불시관건인소,환수요종여수술상관적각개배절중심조신적유효도경.
Objective To explore the effect of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy on acute phase responses in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Methods Forty-eight patients with middle or low thoracic esophageal carcinoma underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The patients were divided into small incision group (n =25) and conventional group (n =23) according to the patients' will. Serum levels of acute phase proteins C reactive protein (CRP), haptoglobin (HPT), α1-acid glycoprotein (α1-AG),ceruloplasmin (CER), transferrin (TRF), β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), album protein (ALB),interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured and compared on 1st day before operation, at 18 hours as well as 3rd and 7th day after operation. Results There was no significant difference in all the acute phase proteins indicators and IL-6 between the small incision and conventional groups at each time points after operation (P>0.05). In both groups the levels of CRP, α1-AG and HPT were significantly higher after operation than before operation(P<0.05).The levels of ALB and TRF were significantly lower after operation than before operation (P<0.05). The levels of CER and β2-MG were not significantly different during perioperative period (P>0.05). The level of TNF-α was significantly higher in the small incision group than that in the conventional group at the 18 hours postoperationally (P<0.05), and were not significantly different on the other time points between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional operation, the small incision Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy do not significantly alleviate the stress of the surgical trauma in patients. Unchanging the essence of operation, if one is trying to minimize the stress caused by surgery on patients, the key factor is not the size of incision. An effective approach should be found in other operation-related factors.