电波科学学报
電波科學學報
전파과학학보
CHINESE JOURNAL OF RADIO SCIENCE
2009年
6期
1049-1054
,共6页
王莹%岳殿武%王谦%何荣希
王瑩%嶽殿武%王謙%何榮希
왕형%악전무%왕겸%하영희
认知无线电%协作频谱检测%似然比%无线衰落信道
認知無線電%協作頻譜檢測%似然比%無線衰落信道
인지무선전%협작빈보검측%사연비%무선쇠락신도
cognitive radio%cooperative spectrum sensing%likelihood ratio test%wireless fading channel
针对认知无线电到融合中心间的控制信道为Nakagami-m衰落信道的情况,研究了认知无线电协作频谱检测问题,推导出融合中心利用衰落信道统计特征的似然比协作频谱检测公式.该方法不需要瞬时信道状态信息,简化了协作频谱检测过程,便于实际应用.通过仿真对融合中心的协作频谱检测性能进行了分析,结果表明:利用衰落信道统计特征的似然比协作频谱检测的性能较利用瞬时信道状态信息的似然比频谱检测性能略有下降,但是在高信噪比或衰落不严重的情况下,二者的性能非常接近,认知无线电节点个数对两种频谱检测方法间的性能差距几乎没有影响.
針對認知無線電到融閤中心間的控製信道為Nakagami-m衰落信道的情況,研究瞭認知無線電協作頻譜檢測問題,推導齣融閤中心利用衰落信道統計特徵的似然比協作頻譜檢測公式.該方法不需要瞬時信道狀態信息,簡化瞭協作頻譜檢測過程,便于實際應用.通過倣真對融閤中心的協作頻譜檢測性能進行瞭分析,結果錶明:利用衰落信道統計特徵的似然比協作頻譜檢測的性能較利用瞬時信道狀態信息的似然比頻譜檢測性能略有下降,但是在高信譟比或衰落不嚴重的情況下,二者的性能非常接近,認知無線電節點箇數對兩種頻譜檢測方法間的性能差距幾乎沒有影響.
침대인지무선전도융합중심간적공제신도위Nakagami-m쇠락신도적정황,연구료인지무선전협작빈보검측문제,추도출융합중심이용쇠락신도통계특정적사연비협작빈보검측공식.해방법불수요순시신도상태신식,간화료협작빈보검측과정,편우실제응용.통과방진대융합중심적협작빈보검측성능진행료분석,결과표명:이용쇠락신도통계특정적사연비협작빈보검측적성능교이용순시신도상태신식적사연비빈보검측성능략유하강,단시재고신조비혹쇠락불엄중적정황하,이자적성능비상접근,인지무선전절점개수대량충빈보검측방법간적성능차거궤호몰유영향.
Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radios was studied with the assumption that the control channels between cognitive radios and the fusion center are Nakagami-m fading channels.The likelihood ratio test equation with the knowledge of the channel statistics was derived.With this method.the fusion center can perform cooperative spectrum sensing without the instantaneous channel state information,and the spectrum sensing process is simplified and more suitable for practical applications.The performance of the proposed cooperative spectrum sensing was analyzed through simulation,the results of which show that the performance of the proposed channel statistics based spectrum sensing method degrades performance slightly compared with the channel state information based likelihood ratio test,but when the average receive SNR is high or the fading effect is weak,the performance of the proposed method can approach that of the channel state information based likelihood ratio test.In addition,the number of cognitive radios has almost no influence on the performance difference between the two methods.