CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨莫西沙星治疗急性胆道感染的有效性及安全性.方法采用多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照、非盲平行研究,选择中国13家医院普外科2009年3～12月间急性胆道感染患者319例,随机入组后在外科治疗的同时给予莫西沙星400 mg,1次/d静脉点滴为A组;B组采用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(2.0 g 2次/d静脉点滴)联合甲硝唑(250 ml1次/d静脉点滴)作为阳性对照,比较两组对急性胆道感染治疗的临床有效性和细菌学疗效,同时观察治疗期间的不良事件.统计学分析对主要疗效指标采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较两组差别,统计学检验均采用双侧检验,安全性分析中对两组不良事件和不良反应的发生率采用x2或Fisher确切概率法,P＜0.05为差异有统计学意义.结果在A组入选的159例患者中有138例进入疗效评价,B组有160例患者入选,其中144例进入评价,两组基线情况相似.A组疗程(7.6±2.6)d,治疗总有效率为86.2%,B组疗程(8±3)d,治疗有效率为84.7%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.7192).两组从血液或胆汁中分别分离出55株和61株细菌,主要分离菌为大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯杆菌和肠球菌,清除率分别为85.4%和82.0%,两组差异无统计学意义(x2=0.2568,P=0.6123).两组用药期间均无严重不良事件发生,依从性良好.结论大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯杆菌、肠球菌是胆道感染主要致病菌.莫西沙星单药可安全有效治疗急性胆道感染,疗效不亚于头孢哌酮/舒巴坦+甲硝唑联合治疗.
목적 탐토막서사성치료급성담도감염적유효성급안전성.방법 채용다중심、전첨성、수궤、대조、비맹평행연구,선택중국13가의원보외과2009년3～12월간급성담도감염환자319례,수궤입조후재외과치료적동시급여막서사성400 mg,1차/d정맥점적위A조;B조채용두포고동/서파탄(2.0 g 2차/d정맥점적)연합갑초서(250 ml1차/d정맥점적)작위양성대조,비교량조대급성담도감염치료적림상유효성화세균학료효,동시관찰치료기간적불량사건.통계학분석대주요료효지표채용Wilcoxon질화검험비교량조차별,통계학검험균채용쌍측검험,안전성분석중대량조불량사건화불량반응적발생솔채용x2혹Fisher학절개솔법,P＜0.05위차이유통계학의의.결과 재A조입선적159례환자중유138례진입료효평개,B조유160례환자입선,기중144례진입평개,량조기선정황상사.A조료정(7.6±2.6)d,치료총유효솔위86.2%,B조료정(8±3)d,치료유효솔위84.7%,차이무통계학의의(P=0.7192).량조종혈액혹담즙중분별분리출55주화61주세균,주요분리균위대장애희균、폐염극뢰백간균화장구균,청제솔분별위85.4%화82.0%,량조차이무통계학의의(x2=0.2568,P=0.6123).량조용약기간균무엄중불량사건발생,의종성량호.결론 대장애희균、폐염극뢰백간균、장구균시담도감염주요치병균.막서사성단약가안전유효치료급성담도감염,료효불아우두포고동/서파탄+갑초서연합치료.
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous moxifloxacin treatment against cefoperazone/sulbactam in patients with acute biliary tract infection. Methods A prospective, randomized, non-blind, multi-centric study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin 400 mg Ⅳ once daily to cefoperazone-sulbactam (2 g q12 hours) and metronidazole 250 ml once daily to treat patients, from March- December 2009 in 13 hospitals, with acute biliary tract infection.The primary efficacy variable was clinical cure rate after the end of a 5 - 14 day treatment period,bacteriologic outcomes and adverse reaction effects were also determined. Results A total of 319 subjects were enrolled, 282 of whom were eligible for protocol efficacy analyses ( 138 moxifloxacin, 144 comparator).Demographic and baseline medical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Clinical success rates were 86.2％ for moxifloxacin and 84. 7％ for the comparator(P =0. 7192). Pathogens (55 moxifloxacin, 61 comparator) were isolated from bile or blood cultures and the predominant strains were E. coli, Klebsiella species and Enterococcus species. Bacterial eradication rates were 85.4％ ( 37 of 55 ) with moxifloxacin versus 82. 0％ (50 of 61 ) in the comparator group ( x2 = 0. 2568, P = 0. 6123 ). Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. Conclusions E. coli, Klebsiella species and Enterococcus species were the most common bacteria isolated from bile or blood from patients with acute biliary tract infection. Moxifloxacin monotherapy has high clinical and bacteriological efficacies and safety for the treatment of acute biliary tract infection.