中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2010年
1期
15-19
,共5页
周宝%金其林%朱茜%高虹%杨国弘%袁长婷%王颖丽%王智勇%孟虹
週寶%金其林%硃茜%高虹%楊國弘%袁長婷%王穎麗%王智勇%孟虹
주보%금기림%주천%고홍%양국홍%원장정%왕영려%왕지용%맹홍
社区卫生服务%医疗保险%评价体系
社區衛生服務%醫療保險%評價體繫
사구위생복무%의료보험%평개체계
Community health services%Health insurance%Evaluation system
目的 研究制定城市社区卫生服务机构医疗保险工作考核指标体系,推进社区卫生服务机构在保障基本医疗质量的前提下合理、有效和充分地利用医疗卫生资源. 方法从医保监督管理、社区卫生服务机构医保管理和临床等三方面选取咨询专家,根据拟定的评价指标体系模型,设计两轮专家调查问卷,按照德尔菲专家咨询法(Delphi method)的要求,咨询活动以专家"背靠背"填写咨询表的方式进行.第一轮专家咨询运用综合指数法对拟定的考核指标体系模型进行筛选,确定考核指标;第二轮专家咨询运用专家赋值法对第一轮专家咨询统计整理的指标体系确定权重.结果 两轮咨询问卷的回收率分别为95.05%、89.71%,专家权威程度均在0.8以上.最终确定了一级指标5项,二级指标27项,并制定考核指标权重体系.结论 本考核指标体系以上海市医保局、上海市医疗保险监督所及辖区内医疗保险定点医疗机构的检查指标为基础,以规范医疗行为、管理医保基金为关注点,此指标体系可为城市社区卫生服务机构医保管理工作评估提供参考信息.
目的 研究製定城市社區衛生服務機構醫療保險工作攷覈指標體繫,推進社區衛生服務機構在保障基本醫療質量的前提下閤理、有效和充分地利用醫療衛生資源. 方法從醫保鑑督管理、社區衛生服務機構醫保管理和臨床等三方麵選取咨詢專傢,根據擬定的評價指標體繫模型,設計兩輪專傢調查問捲,按照德爾菲專傢咨詢法(Delphi method)的要求,咨詢活動以專傢"揹靠揹"填寫咨詢錶的方式進行.第一輪專傢咨詢運用綜閤指數法對擬定的攷覈指標體繫模型進行篩選,確定攷覈指標;第二輪專傢咨詢運用專傢賦值法對第一輪專傢咨詢統計整理的指標體繫確定權重.結果 兩輪咨詢問捲的迴收率分彆為95.05%、89.71%,專傢權威程度均在0.8以上.最終確定瞭一級指標5項,二級指標27項,併製定攷覈指標權重體繫.結論 本攷覈指標體繫以上海市醫保跼、上海市醫療保險鑑督所及轄區內醫療保險定點醫療機構的檢查指標為基礎,以規範醫療行為、管理醫保基金為關註點,此指標體繫可為城市社區衛生服務機構醫保管理工作評估提供參攷信息.
목적 연구제정성시사구위생복무궤구의료보험공작고핵지표체계,추진사구위생복무궤구재보장기본의료질량적전제하합리、유효화충분지이용의료위생자원. 방법종의보감독관리、사구위생복무궤구의보관리화림상등삼방면선취자순전가,근거의정적평개지표체계모형,설계량륜전가조사문권,안조덕이비전가자순법(Delphi method)적요구,자순활동이전가"배고배"전사자순표적방식진행.제일륜전가자순운용종합지수법대의정적고핵지표체계모형진행사선,학정고핵지표;제이륜전가자순운용전가부치법대제일륜전가자순통계정리적지표체계학정권중.결과 량륜자순문권적회수솔분별위95.05%、89.71%,전가권위정도균재0.8이상.최종학정료일급지표5항,이급지표27항,병제정고핵지표권중체계.결론 본고핵지표체계이상해시의보국、상해시의료보험감독소급할구내의료보험정점의료궤구적검사지표위기출,이규범의료행위、관리의보기금위관주점,차지표체계가위성시사구위생복무궤구의보관리공작평고제공삼고신식.
Objective To develop the evaluation index system for health insurance in urban community health services (CHS) so as to promote a reasonable,efficient and full use of medical and health resources in CHS institutions under the premise keeping basic medical quality.Methods The consultation experts were selected in three fields of health insurance surveillance,CHS health insurance management and clinical practice.Delphi method was used in two rounds of questionnaire survey according to indexes in drafted evaluation system model.The drafted indexes were screened by comprehensive index method in the first round experts' consultation so as to determine the appraisal indicators.Then the weight of each settled index in the first round was set by experts' evaluation in the second round.Results The recovery rates in the two rounds of questionnaire consultation were 95.05%and 89.71% respectively.The level of expert authority was more than 0.8.The finally determined indicators were 5 as primary and 27 as second level.Then the indicator weight system was set up. Conclusion This evaluation system is set up based on the examination indexes designated by Shanghai Health Insurance Bureau and its subordinate governmental institutions,with foci being on normalizing medical behavior and management of health insurance fund.This system provides a good reference to evaluation of health care management in urban CHS.