遗传学报
遺傳學報
유전학보
ACTA GENETICA SINICA
2006年
10期
917-928
,共12页
冯宗云%刘仙俊%张义正%凌宏清
馮宗雲%劉仙俊%張義正%凌宏清
풍종운%류선준%장의정%릉굉청
大麦%遗传多样性%微卫星标记%野生大麦%遗传分化%西藏
大麥%遺傳多樣性%微衛星標記%野生大麥%遺傳分化%西藏
대맥%유전다양성%미위성표기%야생대맥%유전분화%서장
Hordeum%genetic diversity%SSR markers%wild barley%gene differentiation%Tibet
以西藏不同地区的106份野生大麦为材料,其中包括50份野生二棱大麦(HS),27份野生瓶形大麦(HL)和29份野生六棱大麦(HA),用Liu等(1996)发表的SSR连锁图的每个连锁群的两个臂的不同位置上选取3~5个共30个SSR标记,研究了西藏3类野生大麦的遗传多样性.结果表明,这3类野生大麦在遗传组成及等位变异频率分布上存在着明显的遗传分化.在总样本中,共检测到229个等位变异,平均每个SSR位点检测到7.6个等位变异,其中70个为这3类野生大麦间共同的等位变异,等位变异数在这3类野生大麦间有明显的差异,亚种间的遗传多样性明显高于亚种内的遗传多样性.其遗传多样性大小顺序为HS>HL>HA.聚类分析表明,野生二棱大麦、野生六棱大麦分别聚在不同的两类,而野生瓶形大麦中各有约50%的材料分别聚在这两类.根据本研究及前人研究结果,我们认为中国栽培大麦是从野生二棱大麦经野生瓶形大麦向野生六棱大麦进化的.该结果支持了栽培大麦起源的"野生二棱大麦单系起源论"的观点.
以西藏不同地區的106份野生大麥為材料,其中包括50份野生二稜大麥(HS),27份野生瓶形大麥(HL)和29份野生六稜大麥(HA),用Liu等(1996)髮錶的SSR連鎖圖的每箇連鎖群的兩箇臂的不同位置上選取3~5箇共30箇SSR標記,研究瞭西藏3類野生大麥的遺傳多樣性.結果錶明,這3類野生大麥在遺傳組成及等位變異頻率分佈上存在著明顯的遺傳分化.在總樣本中,共檢測到229箇等位變異,平均每箇SSR位點檢測到7.6箇等位變異,其中70箇為這3類野生大麥間共同的等位變異,等位變異數在這3類野生大麥間有明顯的差異,亞種間的遺傳多樣性明顯高于亞種內的遺傳多樣性.其遺傳多樣性大小順序為HS>HL>HA.聚類分析錶明,野生二稜大麥、野生六稜大麥分彆聚在不同的兩類,而野生瓶形大麥中各有約50%的材料分彆聚在這兩類.根據本研究及前人研究結果,我們認為中國栽培大麥是從野生二稜大麥經野生瓶形大麥嚮野生六稜大麥進化的.該結果支持瞭栽培大麥起源的"野生二稜大麥單繫起源論"的觀點.
이서장불동지구적106빈야생대맥위재료,기중포괄50빈야생이릉대맥(HS),27빈야생병형대맥(HL)화29빈야생륙릉대맥(HA),용Liu등(1996)발표적SSR련쇄도적매개련쇄군적량개비적불동위치상선취3~5개공30개SSR표기,연구료서장3류야생대맥적유전다양성.결과표명,저3류야생대맥재유전조성급등위변이빈솔분포상존재착명현적유전분화.재총양본중,공검측도229개등위변이,평균매개SSR위점검측도7.6개등위변이,기중70개위저3류야생대맥간공동적등위변이,등위변이수재저3류야생대맥간유명현적차이,아충간적유전다양성명현고우아충내적유전다양성.기유전다양성대소순서위HS>HL>HA.취류분석표명,야생이릉대맥、야생륙릉대맥분별취재불동적량류,이야생병형대맥중각유약50%적재료분별취재저량류.근거본연구급전인연구결과,아문인위중국재배대맥시종야생이릉대맥경야생병형대맥향야생륙릉대맥진화적.해결과지지료재배대맥기원적"야생이릉대맥단계기원론"적관점.
One hundred and six accessions of wild barley collected from Tibet, China, including 50 entries of the two-rowed wild barley Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum (HS), 29 entries of the six-rowed wild barley Hordeum vulgare ssp. agriocrithon (HA),and 27 entries of the six-rowed wild barley Hordeum vulgare ssp. agriocrithon var. lagunculiforme (HL), were analyzed using 30 SSR markers selected from the seven barley linkage groups for studying genetic diversity and evolutionary relationship of the three subspecies of Tibetan wild barley to cultivated barley in China. Over the 30 genetic loci that were studied, 229 alleles were identified among the 106 accessions, of which 70 were common alleles. H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum possesses about thrice more private alleles (2.83 alleles/locus) than HS (0.93 alleles/locus), whereas almost no private alleles were detected in HL. The genetic diversity among-subspecies is much higher than that within-subspecies. Generally, the genetic diversity among the three subspecies is of the order HS > HL > HA. Phylogenetic analysis of the 106 accessions showed that all the accessions of HS and HA was clustered in their own groups, whereas the 27 accessions of HL were separated into two groups (14 entries with group HS and the rest with group HA). This indicated that HL was an intermediate form between HS and HA. Based on this study and previous works, we suggested that Chinese cultivated barley might evolve from HS via HL to HA.