CAJ | 학술논문

评估不同糖尿病筛查问卷的价值.将芬兰糖尿病危险评分和丹麦糖尿病危险评分两种问卷应用于糖尿病普查,芬兰问卷受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.760(95%CI:0.713～0.806,P<0.01),丹麦问卷ROC的AUC为0.706(95%CI:0.647～0.764,P<0.01).两种问卷的敏感度、特异度及预测值均低于文献报道,提示国内普查应使用更符合中国糖尿病人群特征的问卷.
평고불동당뇨병사사문권적개치.장분란당뇨병위험평분화단맥당뇨병위험평분량충문권응용우당뇨병보사,분란문권수시자공작특정(ROC)곡선하면적(AUC)위0.760(95%CI:0.713～0.806,P<0.01),단맥문권ROC적AUC위0.706(95%CI:0.647～0.764,P<0.01).량충문권적민감도、특이도급예측치균저우문헌보도,제시국내보사응사용경부합중국당뇨병인군특정적문권.
Various questionnaires for screening diabetes in Chinese population were evaluated. Two questionnaires (Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and Danish Diabetes Risk Score) were applied. Sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for both questionnaires were calculated. The AUCs were 0. 760 (95% CI: 0.713-0.806) for the Finnish questionnaire (P<0.01) and 0.706 (95% CI: 0.647-0.764) for the Danish one (P<0.01). The sensitivities, specificities and predictive values of both questionnaires were not so good in the present survey as in the published reports. It suggests that these screening questionnaires must be modified to suitable for Chinese population.