农业环境科学学报
農業環境科學學報
농업배경과학학보
Journal of Agro-Environment Science
2010年
4期
773-778
,共6页
陈仪%夏立江%于晓勇%陈梦慧%杨宝刚%赵志友
陳儀%夏立江%于曉勇%陳夢慧%楊寶剛%趙誌友
진의%하립강%우효용%진몽혜%양보강%조지우
住户类型%农村生活垃圾%特征识别
住戶類型%農村生活垃圾%特徵識彆
주호류형%농촌생활랄급%특정식별
differcnt types of farmers%rural solid waste%characteristics identification
以京郊农村熊儿寨乡为例,依托该乡已建立的生活垃圾分类管理模式,分析全乡生活垃圾产生强度与组分特征;重点入户调查纯农户、农业兼业户、非农兼业户、非农户4类典型户,识别其生活垃圾产生强度,以及与经济、养殖、旅游接待等因素的关系,并用SPSS分析相关性与差异性.结果表明,全乡生活垃圾平均产生强度为379.5 g·d-1·人-1;4类典型户生活垃圾产生强度分别为335.3、403.8、414.6、350.7 g·d-1·人-1;生活垃圾产生强度与人均年收入呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),相关系数排序为非农户>农业兼业户>非农兼业户>纯农户;不同类型住户中厨余垃圾产生强度为养殖户低于非养殖户,但差异不显著(P=0.053),民俗旅游接待户明显高于非接待户,差异极显著(P<0.01);人均年收入水平和民俗旅游接待成为影响该乡生活垃圾产生强度的主要因素.
以京郊農村熊兒寨鄉為例,依託該鄉已建立的生活垃圾分類管理模式,分析全鄉生活垃圾產生彊度與組分特徵;重點入戶調查純農戶、農業兼業戶、非農兼業戶、非農戶4類典型戶,識彆其生活垃圾產生彊度,以及與經濟、養殖、旅遊接待等因素的關繫,併用SPSS分析相關性與差異性.結果錶明,全鄉生活垃圾平均產生彊度為379.5 g·d-1·人-1;4類典型戶生活垃圾產生彊度分彆為335.3、403.8、414.6、350.7 g·d-1·人-1;生活垃圾產生彊度與人均年收入呈極顯著正相關(P<0.01),相關繫數排序為非農戶>農業兼業戶>非農兼業戶>純農戶;不同類型住戶中廚餘垃圾產生彊度為養殖戶低于非養殖戶,但差異不顯著(P=0.053),民俗旅遊接待戶明顯高于非接待戶,差異極顯著(P<0.01);人均年收入水平和民俗旅遊接待成為影響該鄉生活垃圾產生彊度的主要因素.
이경교농촌웅인채향위례,의탁해향이건립적생활랄급분류관리모식,분석전향생활랄급산생강도여조분특정;중점입호조사순농호、농업겸업호、비농겸업호、비농호4류전형호,식별기생활랄급산생강도,이급여경제、양식、여유접대등인소적관계,병용SPSS분석상관성여차이성.결과표명,전향생활랄급평균산생강도위379.5 g·d-1·인-1;4류전형호생활랄급산생강도분별위335.3、403.8、414.6、350.7 g·d-1·인-1;생활랄급산생강도여인균년수입정겁현저정상관(P<0.01),상관계수배서위비농호>농업겸업호>비농겸업호>순농호;불동류형주호중주여랄급산생강도위양식호저우비양식호,단차이불현저(P=0.053),민속여유접대호명현고우비접대호,차이겁현저(P<0.01);인균년수입수평화민속여유접대성위영향해향생활랄급산생강도적주요인소.
Xiongerzhai town,located in Beijing rural area,was selected to investigate the production and the characteristics of rural solid waste(RSW)based on the established collection system.To study the output of the RSW and the relationships between the RSW and the economy,or the livestock and poultry production,or the tour reception,farmers were classified into four different categories which were farming households,mainly farming households,mainly off farming households,off farming households according to the source of income and working time.SPSS statistical analysis was used to determine the significance and the relationships.The main results were as follows:(1)The average output of RSW in this area was 379.5 g·d-1 per capita,and 335.3,403.8,414.6,350.7 g·d-1 per capita for the four different types of famers respeetively.(2)Significant positive correlation was found between the output oftbe RSW and the family income(P<0.01),and the order was as following:off farming households(r=0.904 0)>mainly farming households(r=0.8640)>mainly off fanning households(r=0.799 8)>farming households(r=0.605 1).The RSW production of farmers having livestock and poultry production was less than the RSW production of farmers having no livestock and poultry production,but there was no significant difference between them(P=0.053).The RSW production of farmers having tour reception was more than the farmers having no tour reception,and there was significant difference between them(P<0.01).(3)Per capita income and tour reception were the main affecting factors of the RSW production in this area.