CAJ | 학술논문

为了衡量学生对知识的掌握程度、评估教学效果,提高教学质量,对该校2006级五年制临床医学<神经病学>专业考试试卷进行分析.结果显示:平均成绩为87.29分,标准差为7.90.考生成绩呈偏态分布.试卷的整体难度为0.78,区分度为0.19,信度为0.59.说明本套试卷具有可靠性,但整体偏易,不能够很好地区分学生的水平.因此,在以后命题时应适当调整试题的难度,保证试卷的质量和试题的科学性,以便科学地评价教学质量.
위료형량학생대지식적장악정도、평고교학효과,제고교학질량,대해교2006급오년제림상의학<신경병학>전업고시시권진행분석.결과현시:평균성적위87.29분,표준차위7.90.고생성적정편태분포.시권적정체난도위0.78,구분도위0.19,신도위0.59.설명본투시권구유가고성,단정체편역,불능구흔호지구분학생적수평.인차,재이후명제시응괄당조정시제적난도,보증시권적질량화시제적과학성,이편과학지평개교학질량.
In order to understand the students'knowledge mastery,assess teaching effects and improve the quality of teaching,this article analyzed the test papers of Neurology among the five-year program clinical medicine students of Grade 2006 in our College.The results indicated that the mean score of the exam was 87.29 with a standard deviation of 7.90.The distribution was negatively skewed.The degree of difficulty was 0.78 and the discrimination is 0.19.The reliability was 0.59.It demonstrated that the test papers had a good reliability,the design of the test papers was too easy and could not reasonablely discriminate the degree in evaluating the students'mastery of the course.Therefore,we shoud pay attention to appropriate difficulty and ensare quality in preparing test papers to scientifically evaluate teaching quality.