CAJ | 학술논문

应用两种ELISA技术分别对流行性出血热(EHF)患者25例的203份屎液标本特异性IgG,IgM抗体进行了系统的动态研究,发现抗体阳性率分别为84%(21/25)与60%(15/25).而16%(4/25)的患者在整个病程中既无IgG又无IgM抗体排出,表明尿抗体检测阴性结果不能作为EHF患者排除诊断的条件,仅为参考指标.病程中IgG抗体平均滴度动态水平与每日标本阳性率均高于IgM,且两种抗体的动态变化与尿蛋白相符合,证实尿抗体是由于肾脏损害而漏出的结果.
응용량충ELISA기술분별대류행성출혈열(EHF)환자25례적203빈시액표본특이성IgG,IgM항체진행료계통적동태연구,발현항체양성솔분별위84%(21/25)여60%(15/25).이16%(4/25)적환자재정개병정중기무IgG우무IgM항체배출,표명뇨항체검측음성결과불능작위EHF환자배제진단적조건,부위삼고지표.병정중IgG항체평균적도동태수평여매일표본양성솔균고우IgM,차량충항체적동태변화여뇨단백상부합,증실뇨항체시유우신장손해이루출적결과.
A sequential study on the specific IgG and IgM,antibodies 203 urine specimens from 25 patients of epidemio hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome Was performed by two kinds of ELISA techniques:The positive rates of IgG and IgM were 84%(21/25)and.60%(15/25)respectively,and 16% of the patients were negative.However,the negative result dose not imply the exclusion of the disease.We also found that the each-day samples'positive rates and mean titer of IgG were higher than IgM in the whole course of illness.It showed that they were leakages from the damaged kidneys