学理论
學理論
학이론
THEORY LEARNING
2011年
30期
72-73
,共2页
生育权%人格权%生育请求权
生育權%人格權%生育請求權
생육권%인격권%생육청구권
the Right to Birth%the Right to Personality%the Right to Request
生育权乃一项基本人权且属于人格权的范畴，不受他人的支配和干涉，生育请求权之说存在法律逻辑错误。夫妻双方享有平等的生育权，应充分协商，共同行使。夫妻因生育问题发生冲突，不能简单以侵权论，若导致感情确已破裂，一方可诉请离婚。
生育權迺一項基本人權且屬于人格權的範疇，不受他人的支配和榦涉，生育請求權之說存在法律邏輯錯誤。伕妻雙方享有平等的生育權，應充分協商，共同行使。伕妻因生育問題髮生遲突，不能簡單以侵權論，若導緻感情確已破裂，一方可訴請離婚。
생육권내일항기본인권차속우인격권적범주，불수타인적지배화간섭，생육청구권지설존재법률라집착오。부처쌍방향유평등적생육권，응충분협상，공동행사。부처인생육문제발생충돌，불능간단이침권론，약도치감정학이파렬，일방가소청리혼。
The Right to Birth is a basic personal right, and it belongs to the Right to Personality category from the domination of the victors and interfere with others. The Right to Request is a very serious legal logic mistake. Both husband and wife shall have equal right, make full consultation and common exercise. When a couple have conflict because of the Right to Birth, it cannot belong to the category of infringement simply, and if it causes relationships indeed broke, one can sue for divorce.
