物理化学学报
物理化學學報
물이화학학보
ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA
2010年
11期
2915-2919
,共5页
吴维康%王佳力%刘素琴%黄可龙%刘艳飞
吳維康%王佳力%劉素琴%黃可龍%劉豔飛
오유강%왕가력%류소금%황가룡%류염비
聚碳酸酯%二氧化碳%热分解动力学
聚碳痠酯%二氧化碳%熱分解動力學
취탄산지%이양화탄%열분해동역학
Polycarbonate%Carbon dioxide%Thermal decomposition kinetics
通过热重分析研究了新型三元共聚物聚碳酸亚丙酯马来酸酐(PPCMA)在不同升温速率下的热分解动力学.设计并引入一种新的计算方法,非线性约化法(NLA),对共聚物热分解过程中的表观活化能进行了计算.研究发现,虽然用非线性约化法计算的表观活化能相对误差值稍大于用传统计算方法Flynn-Wall-Ozawa(FWO),Tang和Kissinger-Akahira.Sunose(KAS)计算的相对误差值,但其分析合理且计算过程更为简便.此外,固态反应模型拟合方法计算结果表明,共聚物的热分解过程对应多个反应机理.整个热分解过程,表观活化能值处于70-135 kJ·mol-1之间,指前因子处于5.24×104-9.89x107min-1之间,同时,通过对表观活化能值的比较,初步解释了聚碳酸亚丙酯(PPC)与PPCMA热解温度差异的原因.
通過熱重分析研究瞭新型三元共聚物聚碳痠亞丙酯馬來痠酐(PPCMA)在不同升溫速率下的熱分解動力學.設計併引入一種新的計算方法,非線性約化法(NLA),對共聚物熱分解過程中的錶觀活化能進行瞭計算.研究髮現,雖然用非線性約化法計算的錶觀活化能相對誤差值稍大于用傳統計算方法Flynn-Wall-Ozawa(FWO),Tang和Kissinger-Akahira.Sunose(KAS)計算的相對誤差值,但其分析閤理且計算過程更為簡便.此外,固態反應模型擬閤方法計算結果錶明,共聚物的熱分解過程對應多箇反應機理.整箇熱分解過程,錶觀活化能值處于70-135 kJ·mol-1之間,指前因子處于5.24×104-9.89x107min-1之間,同時,通過對錶觀活化能值的比較,初步解釋瞭聚碳痠亞丙酯(PPC)與PPCMA熱解溫度差異的原因.
통과열중분석연구료신형삼원공취물취탄산아병지마래산항(PPCMA)재불동승온속솔하적열분해동역학.설계병인입일충신적계산방법,비선성약화법(NLA),대공취물열분해과정중적표관활화능진행료계산.연구발현,수연용비선성약화법계산적표관활화능상대오차치초대우용전통계산방법Flynn-Wall-Ozawa(FWO),Tang화Kissinger-Akahira.Sunose(KAS)계산적상대오차치,단기분석합리차계산과정경위간편.차외,고태반응모형의합방법계산결과표명,공취물적열분해과정대응다개반응궤리.정개열분해과정,표관활화능치처우70-135 kJ·mol-1지간,지전인자처우5.24×104-9.89x107min-1지간,동시,통과대표관활화능치적비교,초보해석료취탄산아병지(PPC)여PPCMA열해온도차이적원인.
The thermal decomposition kinetics of the novel terpolymer, poly(propylene carbonate maleate) (PPCMA),
was investigated using thermogravimetric (TG) analysis at different heating rates. A new computational method called
nonlinear approximation (NLA) is introduced in this work. The Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), Tang, Kissinger-Akahira-
Sunose (KAS), and NLA methods were used to calculate the apparent activation energy (Ea). The results show that the
NLA method is ideal for E, calculations because of its simpler and more appropriate analysis process. It does, however,
give slightly higher average relative errors for Ea compared to the other typical model-free methods. Calculations using
the solid-state reaction model-fitting method indicated that the thermal decomposition process was composed of
multiple mechanisms. For the whole decomposition process, the values of Ea were between 70 and 135 kJ -mol-1, and
the pre-exponential factor (A) varied from 5.24×104 to 9.89×107 min-1. The differences in Ea also explain the differences in decomposition temperature between poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC) and PPCMA.