CAJ | 학술논문

目的探索综合性干预措施在神经症患者护理中的作用.方法 48例神经症住院患者随机分为对照组(药物治疗)和观察组(药物治疗加综合性干预措施)各24例,分别于治疗前、治疗后(8周后)评定焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS).结果治疗前,两组患者SAS、SDS比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后,观察组SAS、SDS减分率优于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组临床疗效优于对照组(P<0.05).结论综合性干预措施能有效改善神经症患者抑郁、焦虑情绪,提高治愈率,促进疾病的康复.
목적 탐색종합성간예조시재신경증환자호리중적작용.방법 48례신경증주원환자수궤분위대조조(약물치료)화관찰조(약물치료가종합성간예조시)각24례,분별우치료전、치료후(8주후)평정초필자평량표(SAS)、억욱자평량표(SDS).결과 치료전,량조환자SAS、SDS비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).치료후,관찰조SAS、SDS감분솔우우대조조,조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),관찰조림상료효우우대조조(P<0.05).결론 종합성간예조시능유효개선신경증환자억욱、초필정서,제고치유솔,촉진질병적강복.
Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention technique in neuroses nursing.Methods 48 inpatient neuroses were randomly divided into observation group(drug treatment and comprehensive intervention technique)and control group(drug treatment),using self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale(SDS)to evaluate clinical symptoms before and after 2 months treatment.Results Before treatment.SAS and SDS scores between two patient groups had no statistic difference(P>0.05),but after 2 months treatment.the observation group had lower SAS and SDS scores than the control group,the difference were obvious(P<0.05).Conclusions Comprehensive intervention technique was useful in neuroses nursing which can ameliorate depression and anxiety emotions,improve illness recover.