CAJ | 학술논문

目的构建护理专业综合性实验考核指标内容及权重,为护理专业综合性实验考核提供客观、系统的评价标准.方法采用文献检索法和德尔斐法(Delphi)对评价指标进行探讨和论证;利用层次分析法计算指标权重并检验其逻辑一致性.结果选择来自上海、广州、重庆等5省10所医学院校,涉及临床医学、护理学、医学教育学3个领域的28名专家;三轮筛选调杏的有效回收率分别为93.9%、96.8%和100.0%;专家对指标的权威系数均在0.70以上;第三轮专家在指标覆盖面的一致率上达100.0%,各指标表述一致率达96.4%;确立了3项一级指标、14项二级指标及相应的指标内涵,各级指标权重均满足逻辑一致性要求.结论 Delphi法和层次分析法联合确定护理专业综合性实验考核指标体系,保证了考核指标体系的科学性和可靠性,可较全面衡量学生的综合素质和能力,为护理专业综合性实验考核提供参考依据.
목적 구건호리전업종합성실험고핵지표내용급권중,위호리전업종합성실험고핵제공객관、계통적평개표준.방법 채용문헌검색법화덕이비법(Delphi)대평개지표진행탐토화론증;이용층차분석법계산지표권중병검험기라집일치성.결과 선택래자상해、엄주、중경등5성10소의학원교,섭급림상의학、호이학、의학교육학3개영역적28명전가;삼륜사선조행적유효회수솔분별위93.9%、96.8%화100.0%;전가대지표적권위계수균재0.70이상;제삼륜전가재지표복개면적일치솔상체100.0%,각지표표술일치솔체96.4%;학립료3항일급지표、14항이급지표급상응적지표내함,각급지표권중균만족라집일치성요구.결론 Delphi법화층차분석법연합학정호리전업종합성실험고핵지표체계,보증료고핵지표체계적과학성화가고성,가교전면형량학생적종합소질화능력,위호리전업종합성실험고핵제공삼고의거.
Objective To construct a comprehensive nursing content and experiment evaluation index weights for the nursing profession to provide objective and comprehensive evaluation criteria for nursing comprehensive experimental evaluation. Methods Literature search method and the Delphi method(Delphi)were used to explore indicators of evaluation and appraisal the analytic hierarchy process was adopted to calculate index weights and test its logical consistency. Results 28 experts were selected from 10 hospitals of five provinces such as Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chongqing, etc. Three round screening investigations' effective return-ratio Wag 93.9%、96.8%and 100.0%respectively.The authoritative coefficient was above 0.70.3 first-level tar-gets were established,14 second-level targets and the corresponding target connotations, all levels of target weight satisfied the logical uniformity request Conclusions The Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process jointly determine the nursing comprehensive experimental evaluation index system to ensure the scien-title and reliable characteristic of the evaluation index system. It is able to comprehensively measure the overall quality and ability of students for the nursing profession and provide the basis for a comprehensive experimental evaluation.