中华放射肿瘤学杂志
中華放射腫瘤學雜誌
중화방사종류학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
2012年
5期
460-463
,共4页
侯勇%尹勇%马长升%巩贯忠
侯勇%尹勇%馬長升%鞏貫忠
후용%윤용%마장승%공관충
体层摄影术,X线计算机,锥形束%体层摄影术,X线计算机%图像配准%勾画危及器官
體層攝影術,X線計算機,錐形束%體層攝影術,X線計算機%圖像配準%勾畫危及器官
체층섭영술,X선계산궤,추형속%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%도상배준%구화위급기관
Tomography,X-ray computed%Tomography,X-ray computed,cone beam%Image registration%Delineating organs at risk
目的 定量分析肺癌计划CT与千伏级锥形束CT (KVCBCT)应用形变配准软件自动勾画危及器官可行性.方法 选取5例肺癌患者1套定位CT图像和各10套摆位验证KVCBCT图像进行形变配准自动勾画和手工勾画危及器官,比较形变配准和刚性配准后的Dice相似性系数( DSC)、敏感性等差异,并行配对t检验.结果 形变配准和刚性配准在体表轮廓、左肺、右肺、心脏、脊髓的DSC值分别为0.971和0.980(t=3.89,P=0.000)、0.836和0.873(t=4.41,P=0.000)、0.873和0.888(t=3.88,P=0.000)、0.738和0.764(t=4.83,P=0.000)、0.666和0.677(t=2.04,P =0.047);敏感性分别为0.975和0.981(t=1.41,P=0.003)、0.914和0.803(t=-6.88,P=0.000)、0.926和0.800(t=-7.06,P=0.045)、0.782和0.708(t=-2.50,P=0.040)、0.625和0.796(t=-9.09,P=0.000).结论 利用形变配准进行器官轮廓自动勾画差异小于刚性配准,体表轮廓、左右肺形变配准轮廓自动勾画效果优于心脏和脊髓的轮廓自动勾画.
目的 定量分析肺癌計劃CT與韆伏級錐形束CT (KVCBCT)應用形變配準軟件自動勾畫危及器官可行性.方法 選取5例肺癌患者1套定位CT圖像和各10套襬位驗證KVCBCT圖像進行形變配準自動勾畫和手工勾畫危及器官,比較形變配準和剛性配準後的Dice相似性繫數( DSC)、敏感性等差異,併行配對t檢驗.結果 形變配準和剛性配準在體錶輪廓、左肺、右肺、心髒、脊髓的DSC值分彆為0.971和0.980(t=3.89,P=0.000)、0.836和0.873(t=4.41,P=0.000)、0.873和0.888(t=3.88,P=0.000)、0.738和0.764(t=4.83,P=0.000)、0.666和0.677(t=2.04,P =0.047);敏感性分彆為0.975和0.981(t=1.41,P=0.003)、0.914和0.803(t=-6.88,P=0.000)、0.926和0.800(t=-7.06,P=0.045)、0.782和0.708(t=-2.50,P=0.040)、0.625和0.796(t=-9.09,P=0.000).結論 利用形變配準進行器官輪廓自動勾畫差異小于剛性配準,體錶輪廓、左右肺形變配準輪廓自動勾畫效果優于心髒和脊髓的輪廓自動勾畫.
목적 정량분석폐암계화CT여천복급추형속CT (KVCBCT)응용형변배준연건자동구화위급기관가행성.방법 선취5례폐암환자1투정위CT도상화각10투파위험증KVCBCT도상진행형변배준자동구화화수공구화위급기관,비교형변배준화강성배준후적Dice상사성계수( DSC)、민감성등차이,병행배대t검험.결과 형변배준화강성배준재체표륜곽、좌폐、우폐、심장、척수적DSC치분별위0.971화0.980(t=3.89,P=0.000)、0.836화0.873(t=4.41,P=0.000)、0.873화0.888(t=3.88,P=0.000)、0.738화0.764(t=4.83,P=0.000)、0.666화0.677(t=2.04,P =0.047);민감성분별위0.975화0.981(t=1.41,P=0.003)、0.914화0.803(t=-6.88,P=0.000)、0.926화0.800(t=-7.06,P=0.045)、0.782화0.708(t=-2.50,P=0.040)、0.625화0.796(t=-9.09,P=0.000).결론 이용형변배준진행기관륜곽자동구화차이소우강성배준,체표륜곽、좌우폐형변배준륜곽자동구화효과우우심장화척수적륜곽자동구화.
Objective To quantitative analysis the difference of organ contour using planning CT and kilovolt cone beam CT (KVCBCT) deformable registration.Methods One set planning CT image and ten sets of KVCBCT image of one patient were choose and total five patients.Organ contour were automatic outlined to using deformable registration.To compare the organ contours different of deformable registration (DR) and rigid registration (RR).Statistic analysis was executed with paired t-test for dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value and sensitiveness (SENS) value.Results The DSC value of body,left,right lung,heart and spinal respectively:0.971 and 0.980 ( t =3.89,P =0.000 ),0.836 and 0.873 ( t =4.41,P =0.000),0.873 and 0.888 ( t =3.88,P =0.000 ),0.738 and 0.764 ( t =4.83,P =0.000 ),0.666 and 0.677 ( t =2.04,P =0.047 ).The SENS value:0.975 and 0.981 ( t =1.41,P =0.003 ),0.914 and 0.803(t=-6.88,P=0.000),0.926 and 0.800(t=-7.06,P=0.045),0.782 and 0.708(t=-2.50,P=0.040),0.625 and 0.796 (t =-9.09,P =0.000).Conclusions RR is at a competitive disadvantage in terms of organ contour outline.The body,left and right lung that are used DR have advantage over the heart and spinal.