中国地震
中國地震
중국지진
EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH IN CHINA
2009年
3期
223-233
,共11页
王伟涛%王宝善%葛洪魁%陈颙%袁松湧%杨微%李宜晋
王偉濤%王寶善%葛洪魁%陳颙%袁鬆湧%楊微%李宜晉
왕위도%왕보선%갈홍괴%진옹%원송용%양미%리의진
汶川地震%波速变化%主动震源%高精度测量%同震效应
汶川地震%波速變化%主動震源%高精度測量%同震效應
문천지진%파속변화%주동진원%고정도측량%동진효응
Wenchuan earthquake%Velocity variation%Active source%High precise measurement%Coseismic effects
为了监测汶川地震后断裂带附近的波速变化,2008年6月,我们利用快速响应探测系统,在龙门山断裂带北端进行了为期3周的连续观测实验.实验使用电动落锤作为主动震源,GPS连续同步授时的高精度数采作为接收系统.利用记录到的高时间精度观测数据,结合互相关时延检测技术,计算了P波和面波走时的相对变化,来表征地下波速的变化.我们观测到两次面波波速的异常变化,变化幅度最高达到2%,远远大于气压变化所能引起的波速变化.结合该时段内地震活动记录,我们认为面波的波速变化是由在附近发生的两次地震事件的同震效应引起的,该观测结果同理论计算结果相符.
為瞭鑑測汶川地震後斷裂帶附近的波速變化,2008年6月,我們利用快速響應探測繫統,在龍門山斷裂帶北耑進行瞭為期3週的連續觀測實驗.實驗使用電動落錘作為主動震源,GPS連續同步授時的高精度數採作為接收繫統.利用記錄到的高時間精度觀測數據,結閤互相關時延檢測技術,計算瞭P波和麵波走時的相對變化,來錶徵地下波速的變化.我們觀測到兩次麵波波速的異常變化,變化幅度最高達到2%,遠遠大于氣壓變化所能引起的波速變化.結閤該時段內地震活動記錄,我們認為麵波的波速變化是由在附近髮生的兩次地震事件的同震效應引起的,該觀測結果同理論計算結果相符.
위료감측문천지진후단렬대부근적파속변화,2008년6월,아문이용쾌속향응탐측계통,재룡문산단렬대북단진행료위기3주적련속관측실험.실험사용전동락추작위주동진원,GPS련속동보수시적고정도수채작위접수계통.이용기록도적고시간정도관측수거,결합호상관시연검측기술,계산료P파화면파주시적상대변화,래표정지하파속적변화.아문관측도량차면파파속적이상변화,변화폭도최고체도2%,원원대우기압변화소능인기적파속변화.결합해시단내지진활동기록,아문인위면파적파속변화시유재부근발생적량차지진사건적동진효응인기적,해관측결과동이론계산결과상부.
Seismic velocity near the fault zone is sensitive to the stress state within that area. After the Wenchuan earthquake, in order to monitor the velocity variation near fault zone, we conducted a field experiment in the north edge of Longmenshan fault, which lasted three weeks since July 6. In the experiment, an electric hammer was used as a repeatable seismic source and the seismic signals were recorded by eight short period seismometers composed of Guralp 40T sensor and Reftek 130B digitizer. The digitizers were timing continuously with GPS to reduce timing error. We calculate the travel time variation by the combination of absolute time and cross correlation time-delay measurement. The fractal velocity variations were obtained from travel time measurement. Two prominent drops up to~2 % were found, which were much more than the possible variation caused by barometric pressure change. We notice two moderate aftershocks with magnitude 4.9 and 4.7 occurring within 10km from the experiment field, when the two surface velocity drops showed up. We speculate the surface velocity drops may be caused by the coseismic effects of these two earthquakes. The theoretical calculation of the stress drop agrees with our measurement.