中国优生与遗传杂志
中國優生與遺傳雜誌
중국우생여유전잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BIRTH HEALTH AND HEREDITY
2007年
2期
11-13
,共3页
江静%王伟%邱定众%陆文丽%黄晓萍%陈凤生%王德芬
江靜%王偉%邱定衆%陸文麗%黃曉萍%陳鳳生%王德芬
강정%왕위%구정음%륙문려%황효평%진봉생%왕덕분
终身高%靶身高%FPH%CMH%中国上海青年
終身高%靶身高%FPH%CMH%中國上海青年
종신고%파신고%FPH%CMH%중국상해청년
Final height%Target height%FPH%CMH%The Shanghai Chinese children
目的 比较两种预测遗传终身高的方法在中国上海青年的正确性.并作出中国上海青年预测身高的新方法.方法 中国上海青年,男>20岁(n=160),女>18岁(n=160).以中国上海青年的终身高和他们双亲的平均身高对FPH(the Final Height for Parental Height)和CMH(the Corrected Midparental Height)方法进行统计分析和线性逐步回归得出计算公式.结果 中国上海和瑞典的研究人群的身材是不同的(P<0.001).中国上海人比和他们相对应的瑞典人都矮.瑞典人的父母分别比中国上海人的父母高7cm和6cm.瑞典人的男女青年的终身高比中国上海人男女青年都高5cm.中国上海二代人身高男女分别增加3.5cm和2.2cm,而瑞典人仅增加0.7和1.0cm.FPH方法的平均剩余终身高接近于0(0.04cm,P=0.85).而CMH方法的平均剩余终身高明显的高于期望值0(2.87cm,P<0.001).FPH方法的平均绝对剩余终身高(3.0cm)明显小于CMH方法(4cm),两者差异有高度显著性(P=0.000).中国上海青年预测身高的新方法男性:Y=0.5213*X+89.225;女性:Y=1.0458*X-11.499.Y表示预测终身高,X表示父母的平均身高,单位均是cm.结论 FPH公式优于CMH方法.新方法还有待于进一步验证.
目的 比較兩種預測遺傳終身高的方法在中國上海青年的正確性.併作齣中國上海青年預測身高的新方法.方法 中國上海青年,男>20歲(n=160),女>18歲(n=160).以中國上海青年的終身高和他們雙親的平均身高對FPH(the Final Height for Parental Height)和CMH(the Corrected Midparental Height)方法進行統計分析和線性逐步迴歸得齣計算公式.結果 中國上海和瑞典的研究人群的身材是不同的(P<0.001).中國上海人比和他們相對應的瑞典人都矮.瑞典人的父母分彆比中國上海人的父母高7cm和6cm.瑞典人的男女青年的終身高比中國上海人男女青年都高5cm.中國上海二代人身高男女分彆增加3.5cm和2.2cm,而瑞典人僅增加0.7和1.0cm.FPH方法的平均剩餘終身高接近于0(0.04cm,P=0.85).而CMH方法的平均剩餘終身高明顯的高于期望值0(2.87cm,P<0.001).FPH方法的平均絕對剩餘終身高(3.0cm)明顯小于CMH方法(4cm),兩者差異有高度顯著性(P=0.000).中國上海青年預測身高的新方法男性:Y=0.5213*X+89.225;女性:Y=1.0458*X-11.499.Y錶示預測終身高,X錶示父母的平均身高,單位均是cm.結論 FPH公式優于CMH方法.新方法還有待于進一步驗證.
목적 비교량충예측유전종신고적방법재중국상해청년적정학성.병작출중국상해청년예측신고적신방법.방법 중국상해청년,남>20세(n=160),녀>18세(n=160).이중국상해청년적종신고화타문쌍친적평균신고대FPH(the Final Height for Parental Height)화CMH(the Corrected Midparental Height)방법진행통계분석화선성축보회귀득출계산공식.결과 중국상해화서전적연구인군적신재시불동적(P<0.001).중국상해인비화타문상대응적서전인도왜.서전인적부모분별비중국상해인적부모고7cm화6cm.서전인적남녀청년적종신고비중국상해인남녀청년도고5cm.중국상해이대인신고남녀분별증가3.5cm화2.2cm,이서전인부증가0.7화1.0cm.FPH방법적평균잉여종신고접근우0(0.04cm,P=0.85).이CMH방법적평균잉여종신고명현적고우기망치0(2.87cm,P<0.001).FPH방법적평균절대잉여종신고(3.0cm)명현소우CMH방법(4cm),량자차이유고도현저성(P=0.000).중국상해청년예측신고적신방법남성:Y=0.5213*X+89.225;녀성:Y=1.0458*X-11.499.Y표시예측종신고,X표시부모적평균신고,단위균시cm.결론 FPH공식우우CMH방법.신방법환유대우진일보험증.
Objective: To examine the validity of the two methods for target height estimation in Shanghai Chinese children and make a new model to predict final height in Shanghai Chinese children. Methods: Boys age > 20years (n = 160), girls age > 18 years ( n = 160) . Applied CMH method and FPH model to statistics the analysis final height of Shanghai Chinese children and their midparental height. Results: There is a considerable disparity in stature between the Shanghai Chinese and the Swedish study populations.The Shanghai Chinese were shorter than their Swedish counterparts. The Swedish fathers and mothers were 7cm and 6cm taller than the Chinese fathers and mothers , respectively. The Shanghai Chinese children were more than 5 cm shorter than the Swedes in stature. The secular increase in height over the two generations, however, was 3. 5 ~ 2.2 cm for the Shanghai Chinese, much larger than that of the Swedes (0. 7 ~ 1.0cm). The new model derived from Swedish population for estimating target height was shown to be applicable to the Shanghai Chinese children; the mean of residual final height values was close to zero (0. 04cm, P = 0. 85 ). However , the mean of residual final height values was significantly above the expected values of zero (2. 87cm, P <0. 001 ) when the CMH applied to the data.The mean absolute residual final height of FPH method (3cm) below CMH method (4cm) ( P =0. 000). A new model to predict final height (Y) in Shanghai Chinese children by a simple linear function of midparental height (X) in centimeters, boys: Y =0.5213X +89. 225; girls: Y = 1. 0458X - 11. 499. Conclusion: The FPH formula surpasses the CMH method in the Shanghai Chinese children.