中华物理医学与康复杂志
中華物理醫學與康複雜誌
중화물리의학여강복잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
2009年
5期
323-326
,共4页
王修文%牛瑞%孙强三%吴东进%赵序利
王脩文%牛瑞%孫彊三%吳東進%趙序利
왕수문%우서%손강삼%오동진%조서리
肌腱损伤%支具%康复%功能恢复
肌腱損傷%支具%康複%功能恢複
기건손상%지구%강복%공능회복
Tendon injuries%Splintage%Rehabilitation exercise%Functional recovery
目的 探讨个体化、量化康复训练对屈指肌腱吻合术后功能恢复的影响.方法 将180例屈指肌腱吻合术患者随机分为量化组及对照组.量化组患者在术中测量所吻合肌腱的最大抗张强度(F max),术中安装训练支具,测量吻合术后肌腱两断端分离达到2 mm间隙时的橡皮筋长度及载荷,并加装保护装置,术后给予个体化、量化康复训练.对照组患者术中未进行肌腱最大抗张强度测定,术后康复训练时亦无特殊保护装置,由患者自行训练手指活动功能.为进一步研究康复训练频率对疗效的影响,将量化组及对照组分别细分为A,B两亚组,分别给予每天3次(A组)、每天6次(B组)康复训练.结果 经3个月训练后,发现量化组术后无肌腱断离者,对照组有6例患者发生肌腱再断离,量化组优良率达91.1%,对照组优良率为80.0%,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);进一步分析发现,量化B组患者康复疗效明显优于其它亚组,组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 个体化、量化康复训练能有效防止肌腱吻合术后患者肌腱再断离,且每天训练6次可能是较佳康复治疗频率.
目的 探討箇體化、量化康複訓練對屈指肌腱吻閤術後功能恢複的影響.方法 將180例屈指肌腱吻閤術患者隨機分為量化組及對照組.量化組患者在術中測量所吻閤肌腱的最大抗張彊度(F max),術中安裝訓練支具,測量吻閤術後肌腱兩斷耑分離達到2 mm間隙時的橡皮觔長度及載荷,併加裝保護裝置,術後給予箇體化、量化康複訓練.對照組患者術中未進行肌腱最大抗張彊度測定,術後康複訓練時亦無特殊保護裝置,由患者自行訓練手指活動功能.為進一步研究康複訓練頻率對療效的影響,將量化組及對照組分彆細分為A,B兩亞組,分彆給予每天3次(A組)、每天6次(B組)康複訓練.結果 經3箇月訓練後,髮現量化組術後無肌腱斷離者,對照組有6例患者髮生肌腱再斷離,量化組優良率達91.1%,對照組優良率為80.0%,組間差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);進一步分析髮現,量化B組患者康複療效明顯優于其它亞組,組間差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 箇體化、量化康複訓練能有效防止肌腱吻閤術後患者肌腱再斷離,且每天訓練6次可能是較佳康複治療頻率.
목적 탐토개체화、양화강복훈련대굴지기건문합술후공능회복적영향.방법 장180례굴지기건문합술환자수궤분위양화조급대조조.양화조환자재술중측량소문합기건적최대항장강도(F max),술중안장훈련지구,측량문합술후기건량단단분리체도2 mm간극시적상피근장도급재하,병가장보호장치,술후급여개체화、양화강복훈련.대조조환자술중미진행기건최대항장강도측정,술후강복훈련시역무특수보호장치,유환자자행훈련수지활동공능.위진일보연구강복훈련빈솔대료효적영향,장양화조급대조조분별세분위A,B량아조,분별급여매천3차(A조)、매천6차(B조)강복훈련.결과 경3개월훈련후,발현양화조술후무기건단리자,대조조유6례환자발생기건재단리,양화조우량솔체91.1%,대조조우량솔위80.0%,조간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);진일보분석발현,양화B조환자강복료효명현우우기타아조,조간차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 개체화、양화강복훈련능유효방지기건문합술후환자기건재단리,차매천훈련6차가능시교가강복치료빈솔.
Objective To evaluate the effect of individualized and quantified rehabilitation exercise after te-nosuture of the digital flexor tendon. Methods One hundred and eighty cases of digital flexor tendon tenosuture were randomly divided into a quantification group and a control group. For the quantification group, the maximal ten-sile strength against rupture (Fmax) was measured during the operation. After splinting, the length of an elastic bandwas measured when there was a 2 mm clearance between the 2 ends of the sutured tendon, and the protective device was then fixed with all its parameters unchanged in the whole study. For the control group, Fmax was not measured and there was no protective device during training. Both groups were subdivided into subgroups A and B according to the daily training frequency. Training frequencies of 3 or 6 times per day were applied to the two subgroups. Results After 3 months of rehabilitation treatment, there was no re-rupture in the quantification group, but 6 cases of re-rup-ture occurred in the control group. 91% of the eases in the quantification group were evaluated as excellent or good, while in the control group 80% of the cases were evaluated as excellent or good. Clinical efficacy was significantly better in the quantification subgroup receiving 6 treatments per day than in any other subgroup. Conclusions Indi-vidualized and quantified rehabilitation exercise can prevent tendon re-rupture after tenosuture. 6 sessions of training per day may be better than 3 sessions per day.