CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较肌肉压片法和消化法检测野生淡水鱼中华支睾吸虫囊蚴的检出率.方法从华支睾吸虫病重流行区广西横县旺天塘采集野生淡水鱼样本,分别采用肌肉压片法和消化法检测每尾鱼感染华支睾吸虫囊蚴情况.计算华支睾吸虫囊蚴的检出率,采用配对卡方检验对2种方法的检出率进行比较.结果共检测了210尾鱼,总检出率为36.67％(77/210),其中肌肉压片法检出率为34.29％(72/210),消化法检出率为32.38％(68/210),差异无统计学意义(x2=0.64,P＞0.05).结论两种方法检测野生淡水鱼中华支睾吸虫囊蚴的检出率差异无统计学意义.
목적 비교기육압편법화소화법검측야생담수어중화지고흡충낭유적검출솔.방법 종화지고흡충병중류행구엄서횡현왕천당채집야생담수어양본,분별채용기육압편법화소화법검측매미어감염화지고흡충낭유정황.계산화지고흡충낭유적검출솔,채용배대잡방검험대2충방법적검출솔진행비교.결과 공검측료210미어,총검출솔위36.67％(77/210),기중기육압편법검출솔위34.29％(72/210),소화법검출솔위32.38％(68/210),차이무통계학의의(x2=0.64,P＞0.05).결론 량충방법검측야생담수어중화지고흡충낭유적검출솔차이무통계학의의.
Objective To compare the detection rate of direct compression method and artificial digestion (pepsin-HCl) method for examining the Clonorchis sinensis metacercariae in wild freshwater fish.Methods Wild freshwater fish were collected from the Wangtian pond in Heng County,Guangxi Province,one of the epidemic areas of clonorchiasis in China.Each fish was examined by direct compression method and artificial digestion (pepsin-HC1) method respectively to detect the metacercariae under a dissection microscope.The detection rates of these two methods were compared by McNemar test.Results A total of 210 fish from 2 species was tested.The total detection rate was 36.67％ (77/210),while 34.29％ (72/210)by direct compression method and 32.38％ (68/210)by artificial digestion method respectively.There were no significantly difference between two methods (X2=0.64,P＞0.05 ).Conclusion There are no significant difference between the detection rate of these two methods.