中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2009年
10期
1745-1746
,共2页
李成德%李南洋%申学基%李海珠%梁莉红
李成德%李南洋%申學基%李海珠%樑莉紅
리성덕%리남양%신학기%리해주%량리홍
癌%非小细胞肺%硫酸粘多糖片段%抗原%肿瘤相关%碳水化合物%癌胚抗原
癌%非小細胞肺%硫痠粘多糖片段%抗原%腫瘤相關%碳水化閤物%癌胚抗原
암%비소세포폐%류산점다당편단%항원%종류상관%탄수화합물%암배항원
Carcinoma,non-Small-Cell Lung%Sulfate glycosaminoglycan fragments%Antigens,tumor-associated,carcinoembryomic antigen%Carcinoembryonic antigen
目的 探讨血清硫酸粘多糖片段(SGF)、恶性肿瘤相关物质(TSGF)及癌胚抗原(CEA)三种肿瘤标志物在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者血清中的表达及临床意义.方法 采用胶乳凝集法、生化显色法和化学发光法检测50例NSCLC患者血清SGF、TSGF及CEA水平,比较不同的检测组合方式在NSCLC诊断中的价值.结果 NSCLC Ⅰ~Ⅱ期与Ⅲ期间及Ⅲ期与Ⅳ期间SGF水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SGF、TS-GF及CEA单项与SGF和TSGF组合检测特异性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SGF和TSGF组合与SGF、TS-GF及CEA组合间灵敏度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其特异性差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 三种肿瘤标志物在NSCLC患者血清中均有较高表达,不同的组合检测中SGF与TSGF组合对NSCLC诊断优于其他组合.
目的 探討血清硫痠粘多糖片段(SGF)、噁性腫瘤相關物質(TSGF)及癌胚抗原(CEA)三種腫瘤標誌物在非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者血清中的錶達及臨床意義.方法 採用膠乳凝集法、生化顯色法和化學髮光法檢測50例NSCLC患者血清SGF、TSGF及CEA水平,比較不同的檢測組閤方式在NSCLC診斷中的價值.結果 NSCLC Ⅰ~Ⅱ期與Ⅲ期間及Ⅲ期與Ⅳ期間SGF水平差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);SGF、TS-GF及CEA單項與SGF和TSGF組閤檢測特異性差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);SGF和TSGF組閤與SGF、TS-GF及CEA組閤間靈敏度差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),其特異性差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 三種腫瘤標誌物在NSCLC患者血清中均有較高錶達,不同的組閤檢測中SGF與TSGF組閤對NSCLC診斷優于其他組閤.
목적 탐토혈청류산점다당편단(SGF)、악성종류상관물질(TSGF)급암배항원(CEA)삼충종류표지물재비소세포폐암(NSCLC)환자혈청중적표체급림상의의.방법 채용효유응집법、생화현색법화화학발광법검측50례NSCLC환자혈청SGF、TSGF급CEA수평,비교불동적검측조합방식재NSCLC진단중적개치.결과 NSCLC Ⅰ~Ⅱ기여Ⅲ기간급Ⅲ기여Ⅳ기간SGF수평차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);SGF、TS-GF급CEA단항여SGF화TSGF조합검측특이성차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);SGF화TSGF조합여SGF、TS-GF급CEA조합간령민도차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),기특이성차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 삼충종류표지물재NSCLC환자혈청중균유교고표체,불동적조합검측중SGF여TSGF조합대NSCLC진단우우기타조합.
Objective To establish a serological diagnostic method about NSCLC by investigating the expres-sion of 3 tumor markers of the sulfate glycosaminoglyean fragments(SGF), TSGF and CEA in NSCLC patients' serum. Methods To assay the level of SGF,TSGF and CEA in 50 NSCLC patients with latex particleagglutiation test,colori-metry of biochemistry and CLIA, respectively. Compared the clinical value of different examination combination way in NSCLC diagnosis value. Results There was high difference value between the Ⅰ - Ⅱ stage and the Ⅲ time,the Ⅲ time and the Ⅳ time about the level of SGF(P <0.05) in NSCLC patients. The specificity between SGF,TSGF and CEA each single item and the SGF and TSGF combination examination were not significant(P > 0.05). The semitivity between the SGF and TSGF combination and the SGF,TSGF and CEA combination was not significant(P >0.05), its specificity had significant difference(P <0.05). Conclusions There are higher expression about the 3 tumor mark-ers in NSCLC patients' serum. In the different combination examination, SGF and TSGF combined has great clinical value than other combinations to diagnosis NSCLC.