中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2011年
9期
778-784
,共7页
王畅%董晓梅%代金芳%池桂波%王声湧%董杉%彭淋
王暢%董曉梅%代金芳%池桂波%王聲湧%董杉%彭淋
왕창%동효매%대금방%지계파%왕성용%동삼%팽림
暴力%学生%危险因素
暴力%學生%危險因素
폭력%학생%위험인소
Violence%Students%Risk factors
目的 了解广州市大学生校园暴力发生情况，探讨施暴和受暴的危险因素。方法 以2010年广州市高校在校本科生为调查对象，采取分层整群抽样的方法抽取3所高校，对其中的2200名大学生实施校园暴力及其影响因素问卷调查，共回收有效问卷2103份。采用卡方检验分析校园暴力的性别、年级、专业分布情况。对可能影响校园暴力中施暴和受暴的因素进行非条件logistic回归分析。结果 广州市大学生校同暴力发生率为69.9％( 1471/2103)，男、女生校园暴力发生率分别为75.6％ (830/1098)、63.8％ (641/1005)( x2= 34.82，P＜0.05)。校园暴力施暴和受暴发生率分别为63.6％ (1338/2103)、55.3％( 1163/2103)，男生施暴和受暴发生率分别为70.9％ (778/1098)、60.0％ (659/1098)，女生施暴和受暴发生率分别为55.7％( 560/1005)、50.1％ (504/1005) (x2施暴=51.93，x2受暴=20.68，P值均＜0.01)。精神暴力发生率最高，为68.0％(1430/2103)，其次为性暴力，发生率为34.2％ (719/2103)，躯体暴力最低，为16.5％( 348/2103)。Logistic回归分析显示，男生(OR= 1.60)、文科专业(OR= 1.82)、非独生子女（OR =1.31）、生活费不足(基本够用OR= 1.35,不够用OR= 1.54)、玩电脑游戏(OR= 1.70)、玩滑板等特技(0R=2.03)、喜欢暴力节目（一般OR=1.30，喜欢0R=1.44）、母亲有赌博行为(OR =4.29)、父亲放纵型教养方式(OR= 1.60)、高中之前有时遭他人欺负（OR =1.61）、对学校现行环境和制度不满(没什么特别感觉OR= 1.67，有部分不满OR=1.89)、小学老师对自己有不良行为（有1种时OR =1.35，有2种及以上时OR= 1.90）（P值均＜0.05）是校园暴力施暴的危险因素。男生(0R=1.23)、少数民族(OR=1.71)、非独生子女(OR= 1.39)、自身有不良行为习惯（OR= 1.32）、家庭经济困难（一般OR= 1.51，困难OR= 1.88）、母亲有赌博行为(OR =2.33)、父亲放纵型教养方式(0R=1.37)、偶尔被母亲体罚(OR= 1.35)、高中之前曾遭他人欺负（有时OR= 1.61,经常OR= 1.85）、上学期间压力大(有点大OR= 1.37，非常大OR= 1.40)、对学校现行环境和制度不满（有部分不满OR= 1.56，完全不满OR =2.04）、小学老师对自己有不良行为(有1种时OR= 1.70，有2种及以上时OR=2.04)（P值均＜0.05）是校园暴力受暴的危险因素。结论 广州市大学生校园暴力现象较严重，尤其是精神暴力和性暴力，校园暴力施暴和受暴的危险因素种类多。
目的 瞭解廣州市大學生校園暴力髮生情況，探討施暴和受暴的危險因素。方法 以2010年廣州市高校在校本科生為調查對象，採取分層整群抽樣的方法抽取3所高校，對其中的2200名大學生實施校園暴力及其影響因素問捲調查，共迴收有效問捲2103份。採用卡方檢驗分析校園暴力的性彆、年級、專業分佈情況。對可能影響校園暴力中施暴和受暴的因素進行非條件logistic迴歸分析。結果 廣州市大學生校同暴力髮生率為69.9％( 1471/2103)，男、女生校園暴力髮生率分彆為75.6％ (830/1098)、63.8％ (641/1005)( x2= 34.82，P＜0.05)。校園暴力施暴和受暴髮生率分彆為63.6％ (1338/2103)、55.3％( 1163/2103)，男生施暴和受暴髮生率分彆為70.9％ (778/1098)、60.0％ (659/1098)，女生施暴和受暴髮生率分彆為55.7％( 560/1005)、50.1％ (504/1005) (x2施暴=51.93，x2受暴=20.68，P值均＜0.01)。精神暴力髮生率最高，為68.0％(1430/2103)，其次為性暴力，髮生率為34.2％ (719/2103)，軀體暴力最低，為16.5％( 348/2103)。Logistic迴歸分析顯示，男生(OR= 1.60)、文科專業(OR= 1.82)、非獨生子女（OR =1.31）、生活費不足(基本夠用OR= 1.35,不夠用OR= 1.54)、玩電腦遊戲(OR= 1.70)、玩滑闆等特技(0R=2.03)、喜歡暴力節目（一般OR=1.30，喜歡0R=1.44）、母親有賭博行為(OR =4.29)、父親放縱型教養方式(OR= 1.60)、高中之前有時遭他人欺負（OR =1.61）、對學校現行環境和製度不滿(沒什麽特彆感覺OR= 1.67，有部分不滿OR=1.89)、小學老師對自己有不良行為（有1種時OR =1.35，有2種及以上時OR= 1.90）（P值均＜0.05）是校園暴力施暴的危險因素。男生(0R=1.23)、少數民族(OR=1.71)、非獨生子女(OR= 1.39)、自身有不良行為習慣（OR= 1.32）、傢庭經濟睏難（一般OR= 1.51，睏難OR= 1.88）、母親有賭博行為(OR =2.33)、父親放縱型教養方式(0R=1.37)、偶爾被母親體罰(OR= 1.35)、高中之前曾遭他人欺負（有時OR= 1.61,經常OR= 1.85）、上學期間壓力大(有點大OR= 1.37，非常大OR= 1.40)、對學校現行環境和製度不滿（有部分不滿OR= 1.56，完全不滿OR =2.04）、小學老師對自己有不良行為(有1種時OR= 1.70，有2種及以上時OR=2.04)（P值均＜0.05）是校園暴力受暴的危險因素。結論 廣州市大學生校園暴力現象較嚴重，尤其是精神暴力和性暴力，校園暴力施暴和受暴的危險因素種類多。
목적 료해엄주시대학생교완폭력발생정황，탐토시폭화수폭적위험인소。방법 이2010년엄주시고교재교본과생위조사대상，채취분층정군추양적방법추취3소고교，대기중적2200명대학생실시교완폭력급기영향인소문권조사，공회수유효문권2103빈。채용잡방검험분석교완폭력적성별、년급、전업분포정황。대가능영향교완폭력중시폭화수폭적인소진행비조건logistic회귀분석。결과 엄주시대학생교동폭력발생솔위69.9％( 1471/2103)，남、녀생교완폭력발생솔분별위75.6％ (830/1098)、63.8％ (641/1005)( x2= 34.82，P＜0.05)。교완폭력시폭화수폭발생솔분별위63.6％ (1338/2103)、55.3％( 1163/2103)，남생시폭화수폭발생솔분별위70.9％ (778/1098)、60.0％ (659/1098)，녀생시폭화수폭발생솔분별위55.7％( 560/1005)、50.1％ (504/1005) (x2시폭=51.93，x2수폭=20.68，P치균＜0.01)。정신폭력발생솔최고，위68.0％(1430/2103)，기차위성폭력，발생솔위34.2％ (719/2103)，구체폭력최저，위16.5％( 348/2103)。Logistic회귀분석현시，남생(OR= 1.60)、문과전업(OR= 1.82)、비독생자녀（OR =1.31）、생활비불족(기본구용OR= 1.35,불구용OR= 1.54)、완전뇌유희(OR= 1.70)、완활판등특기(0R=2.03)、희환폭력절목（일반OR=1.30，희환0R=1.44）、모친유도박행위(OR =4.29)、부친방종형교양방식(OR= 1.60)、고중지전유시조타인기부（OR =1.61）、대학교현행배경화제도불만(몰십요특별감각OR= 1.67，유부분불만OR=1.89)、소학로사대자기유불량행위（유1충시OR =1.35，유2충급이상시OR= 1.90）（P치균＜0.05）시교완폭력시폭적위험인소。남생(0R=1.23)、소수민족(OR=1.71)、비독생자녀(OR= 1.39)、자신유불량행위습관（OR= 1.32）、가정경제곤난（일반OR= 1.51，곤난OR= 1.88）、모친유도박행위(OR =2.33)、부친방종형교양방식(0R=1.37)、우이피모친체벌(OR= 1.35)、고중지전증조타인기부（유시OR= 1.61,경상OR= 1.85）、상학기간압력대(유점대OR= 1.37，비상대OR= 1.40)、대학교현행배경화제도불만（유부분불만OR= 1.56，완전불만OR =2.04）、소학로사대자기유불량행위(유1충시OR= 1.70，유2충급이상시OR=2.04)（P치균＜0.05）시교완폭력수폭적위험인소。결론 엄주시대학생교완폭력현상교엄중，우기시정신폭력화성폭력，교완폭력시폭화수폭적위험인소충류다。
Objective To explore the incidence and risk factors of campus violence in Guangzhou. Methods 2200 college students in three universities in Guangzhou were selected by cluster sampling method and were interviewed with self-designed questionnaire about the incidence and risk factors of campus violence in 2010. The final analysis sample was 2103. Chi-square test was used to analyze the gender,grade and major distribution of campus violence. Logistic regression method was used to analyze the influencing factors of campus violence in bulby and victim. Results The incidence of campus violence in Guangzhou was 69.9％ ( 1471/2103 ). In boys and girls the incidence of campus violence was 75.6％(830/1098) and 63.8％ (641/1005)(x2 =34. 82,P ＜0.05). The incidence of bully and victim of campus violence was 63.6％ (1338/2103) and 55.3％ (1163/2103). The incidence of bully and victim in boys was 70.9％ (778/1098) and 60.0％ (659/1098) ,and in girls was 55.7％ (560/1005) and 50.1％ (504/1005)(x2bully = 51.93,x2vietim=20.68, P ＜ 0.01 ). The incidence of psychological violence was the highest (68.0％1430/2103) ,followed by sexual violence (34.2％ ,719/2103 ), the incidence of physical violence was the lowest( 16.5％ ,348/2103). Results of logistic regression showed that boys( OR = 1.60) ,arts( OR = 1.82),with siblings( OR = 1.31 ), the living expenses was not enough ( basic enough OR = 1.35, not enough OR =1.54 ), playing the computer games ( OR = 1.70 ), playing tricks such as sliding plate ( OR = 2.03 ), loving violence program ( general OR = 1.30, very like OR = 1.44 ), mother with gamble behavior ( OR = 4.29 ),father's indulgent education style ( OR = 1.60 ), been bullied by others before high school ( OR = 1.61 ),dissatisfaction to the environment and rules of campus ( nothing special feeling OR = 1.67, some dissatisfaction OR = 1.89 ), been treated badly by primary school teacher ( one kind OR = 1.35, two kinds and above OR = 1.90) were the risk factors of bully. Boys( OR = 1.23 ), minority( OR = 1.71 ) ,with siblings ( OR = 1.39) ,bad behavior and habit( OR = 1.32) ,the bad family economic conditions( general OR = 1.51,difficult OR = 1.88 ), mother with gamble behavior( OR = 2.33 ), father' s indulgent education style ( OR =1.37), occasional physical punishment by mother ( OR = 1.35 ), been bullied by others before high school ( sometimes OR = 1.61 ,often OR = 1.85 ) ,high pressure during the study( a little high OR = 1.37 ,very high OR = 1.40 ), dissatisfaction to the environment and rules of campus ( some dissatisfaction OR = 1.56,completely dissatisfaction OR =2.04), been treated badly by primary school teacher( one kind OR = 1.70,two kinds and above OR = 2.04) were the risk factors of being victim. Conclusion The campus violence in Guangzhou is serious, especially the psychological violence and sexual violence. And the risk factors of campus violence in bully and victim are multifold.
