中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2010年
8期
487-489
,共3页
杨学文%龙星%东耀峻%陈红生%孙绍山
楊學文%龍星%東耀峻%陳紅生%孫紹山
양학문%룡성%동요준%진홍생%손소산
功能恢复%肌功能疗法%张口度
功能恢複%肌功能療法%張口度
공능회복%기공능요법%장구도
Recovery function%Myofunctional therapy%Mouth opening
目的 探讨肌功能康复训练对下颌升支矢状截骨术后功能恢复的作用.方法 利用自行研制的张口训练器,借鉴国外的功能训练方法 ,对接受下颌升支矢状截骨术的27例患者进行被动张口训练和有阻力的肌肉耐力训练,在颌间牵引拆除后2~3 d,使用张口训练器插入牙列间锻炼张口度,5 min/次,3~4次/d.在张口度达到20~25 mm后进行肌肉耐力训练.患者用后牙咬合施加阻力后的张口器并维持5 s后,松弛5 s再咬合,反复进行,5 min/次,3~4次/d,持续3~4周.27例康复训练结果 与20例接受同类手术未行功能康复训练的患者对比.结果 接受肌功能训练的患者术后4周时张口度[(34.72±3.75)mm]已接近术前水平,8周时(牙合)力[(231.08±62.52)N]达到术前水平.未接受肌功能训练的患者在术后4、8周时张口度[(28.42±4.11)mm]和(牙合)力[(210.90±73.40)N]均值仍低于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 系统和规范的肌功能康复训练,并配合使用新型张口训练器,能加速下颌升支矢状截骨术患者口颌系统功能的恢复速度.
目的 探討肌功能康複訓練對下頜升支矢狀截骨術後功能恢複的作用.方法 利用自行研製的張口訓練器,藉鑒國外的功能訓練方法 ,對接受下頜升支矢狀截骨術的27例患者進行被動張口訓練和有阻力的肌肉耐力訓練,在頜間牽引拆除後2~3 d,使用張口訓練器插入牙列間鍛煉張口度,5 min/次,3~4次/d.在張口度達到20~25 mm後進行肌肉耐力訓練.患者用後牙咬閤施加阻力後的張口器併維持5 s後,鬆弛5 s再咬閤,反複進行,5 min/次,3~4次/d,持續3~4週.27例康複訓練結果 與20例接受同類手術未行功能康複訓練的患者對比.結果 接受肌功能訓練的患者術後4週時張口度[(34.72±3.75)mm]已接近術前水平,8週時(牙閤)力[(231.08±62.52)N]達到術前水平.未接受肌功能訓練的患者在術後4、8週時張口度[(28.42±4.11)mm]和(牙閤)力[(210.90±73.40)N]均值仍低于術前,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 繫統和規範的肌功能康複訓練,併配閤使用新型張口訓練器,能加速下頜升支矢狀截骨術患者口頜繫統功能的恢複速度.
목적 탐토기공능강복훈련대하합승지시상절골술후공능회복적작용.방법 이용자행연제적장구훈련기,차감국외적공능훈련방법 ,대접수하합승지시상절골술적27례환자진행피동장구훈련화유조력적기육내력훈련,재합간견인탁제후2~3 d,사용장구훈련기삽입아렬간단련장구도,5 min/차,3~4차/d.재장구도체도20~25 mm후진행기육내력훈련.환자용후아교합시가조력후적장구기병유지5 s후,송이5 s재교합,반복진행,5 min/차,3~4차/d,지속3~4주.27례강복훈련결과 여20례접수동류수술미행공능강복훈련적환자대비.결과 접수기공능훈련적환자술후4주시장구도[(34.72±3.75)mm]이접근술전수평,8주시(아합)력[(231.08±62.52)N]체도술전수평.미접수기공능훈련적환자재술후4、8주시장구도[(28.42±4.11)mm]화(아합)력[(210.90±73.40)N]균치잉저우술전,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 계통화규범적기공능강복훈련,병배합사용신형장구훈련기,능가속하합승지시상절골술환자구합계통공능적회복속도.
Objective To investigate the effect of muscular rehabilitation on recovery after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Methods Twenty-seven patients undergoing sagittal split ramus osteotomy received passive motion training and muscle endurance training after surgery using the new-developed mouth-opening trainer. The passive motion training began 2-3 days after the removal of inter-maxillary elastraction. The instrument was inserted into the inter-maxillary space for 5 min per time, 3-4 times per day. When the mouth opening reached a range of 20-25 mm, the muscle endurance training initiated. The results of the training were compared with another 20 cases who received the same surgery. Results The mouth opening of the patients who received muscular rehabilitation achieved the pre-surgical level 4 weeks after surgery [(34. 72 ±3. 75) mm], the bite force reached the pre-surgical level 8 weeks after surgery [ (231.08 ±62. 52) N], but in the 20 cases without training the mouth opening [ (28. 42 ±4. 11 ) mm] in 4 weeks and the bite force in 8 weeks [ (210. 90 4±73.40) N] were lower after surgery than before surgery. Conclusions The systematic and standard muscle function training, accompanied with the use of the new-developed mouth-opening trainer could improve the functional recovery of the patients who receive sagittal split ramus osteotomies.